AIMS: Myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) is defined as the maximal possible increase in myocardial blood flow (MBF) above baseline conditions. Global MBF can be measured non-invasively by means of coronary sinus flow velocity encoded cine (VENC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We aimed to explore the relationship between global MBF/MPR and the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients referred for CAD work-up by adenosine-stress CMR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with suspected obstructive CAD underwent both adenosine-stress CMR and invasive coronary angiography. In addition to standard cine- and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-imaging, first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary sinus flow measurements (VENC) were performed at rest and during peak stress (after 140 µg/kg/min adenosine), respectively. Nineteen young patients with a very low CAD pre-test probability and normal adenosine-stress CMR formed the control group. Fifty-nine percent (n = 34) of the study group showed segmental, adenosine-induced myocardial perfusion defects compared to none of the control group (P < 0.001). Global MPR was lower in the study group compared to the control group: 2.3 (1.5-3.1) vs. 3.1 (2.0-4.3), P = 0.016. The SYNTAX score was higher in the study group patients with an impaired MPR (<2) compared to those with a preserved MPR (3.0 vs. 16.0, P = 0.01)-mainly due to higher prevalence of proximal epicardial stenoses (60% vs. 27%, P = 0.02) and multi-vessel disease (56% vs. 24%, P = 0.017). The diagnostic yield of stress CMR for the diagnosis of CAD (>50% stenosis) increased from 65to 88% when global MPR assessment was considered in addition to MPI (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Global MBF and MPR values correlate with the anatomical extent and complexity of CAD and increase the diagnostic yield of non-invasive stress CMR in the work-up of CAD. CMR-based MBF and MPR measurements may play a future role in the evaluation of the total ischaemic burden-particularly in patients with multi-vessel disease. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) is defined as the maximal possible increase in myocardial blood flow (MBF) above baseline conditions. Global MBF can be measured non-invasively by means of coronary sinus flow velocity encoded cine (VENC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We aimed to explore the relationship between global MBF/MPR and the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients referred for CAD work-up by adenosine-stress CMR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with suspected obstructive CAD underwent both adenosine-stress CMR and invasive coronary angiography. In addition to standard cine- and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-imaging, first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary sinus flow measurements (VENC) were performed at rest and during peak stress (after 140 µg/kg/min adenosine), respectively. Nineteen young patients with a very low CAD pre-test probability and normal adenosine-stress CMR formed the control group. Fifty-nine percent (n = 34) of the study group showed segmental, adenosine-induced myocardial perfusion defects compared to none of the control group (P < 0.001). Global MPR was lower in the study group compared to the control group: 2.3 (1.5-3.1) vs. 3.1 (2.0-4.3), P = 0.016. The SYNTAX score was higher in the study group patients with an impaired MPR (<2) compared to those with a preserved MPR (3.0 vs. 16.0, P = 0.01)-mainly due to higher prevalence of proximal epicardial stenoses (60% vs. 27%, P = 0.02) and multi-vessel disease (56% vs. 24%, P = 0.017). The diagnostic yield of stress CMR for the diagnosis of CAD (>50% stenosis) increased from 65to 88% when global MPR assessment was considered in addition to MPI (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Global MBF and MPR values correlate with the anatomical extent and complexity of CAD and increase the diagnostic yield of non-invasive stress CMR in the work-up of CAD. CMR-based MBF and MPR measurements may play a future role in the evaluation of the total ischaemic burden-particularly in patients with multi-vessel disease. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Michael Bietenbeck; Anca Florian; Zornitsa Shomanova; Claudia Meier; Ali Yilmaz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Stefanos Drakos; Grigorios Chatzantonis; Michael Bietenbeck; Georg Evers; Arik Bernard Schulze; Michael Mohr; Helena Fonfara; Claudia Meier; Ali Yilmaz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 4.379