Literature DB >> 29774149

The Rome IV versus Rome III criteria for heartburn diagnosis: A comparative study.

Mengyu Zhang1, Minhu Chen1, Sui Peng1, Yinglian Xiao1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The phenotypes of heartburn patients are heterogeneous.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the proportion of heartburn phenotypes in a Chinese population and to compare the Rome IV and III criteria for heartburn diagnosis.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed among heartburn patients referred for upper endoscopy and esophageal function tests in a tertiary hospital. Their symptoms fulfilled Rome IV and III criteria.
RESULTS: A total of 233 patients were included. Fifty-nine patients (25%) were diagnosed with esophagitis, 96 (41%) with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and 78 (34%) with functional heartburn (FH) based on Rome III criteria. Approximately 70% of the Rome III NERD patients were changed based on Rome IV criteria, with 36 patients (15%) diagnosed with reflux hypersensitivity (RH) and 32 patients (14%) who didn't fulfill the criteria considered unclassified. The FH and RH patients showed higher esophagogastric junction-contractile integral (EGJ-CI) and less hiatal hernia than did Rome IV NERD patients. The unclassified had more hiatal hernias than the FH and RH (p < 0.05). The EGJ-CI was similar between Rome III NERD and FH cases.
CONCLUSION: The Rome IV criteria were stricter for heartburn diagnosis and superior in distinguishing NERD from functional disorders on motility patterns than Rome III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heartburn; Rome III criteria; Rome IV criteria; function esophageal disorders; gastroesophageal reflux disease; screening and diagnosis

Year:  2017        PMID: 29774149      PMCID: PMC5949975          DOI: 10.1177/2050640617735084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  31 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of patients with reflux symptoms refractory to proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Daniel Sifrim; Frank Zerbib
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Basic and clinical aspects of gastrointestinal pain.

Authors:  Charles H Knowles; Qasim Aziz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Oesophageal motility and bolus transit abnormalities increase in parallel with the severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  E Savarino; L Gemignani; D Pohl; P Zentilin; P Dulbecco; L Assandri; E Marabotto; D Bonfanti; S Inferrera; V Fazio; A Malesci; R Tutuian; V Savarino
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)--acid reflux and symptom patterns.

Authors:  S D Martinez; I B Malagon; H S Garewal; H Cui; R Fass
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Characteristics of reflux episodes and symptom association in patients with erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease: study using combined impedance-pH off therapy.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Radu Tutuian; Patrizia Zentilin; Pietro Dulbecco; Daniel Pohl; Elisa Marabotto; Andrea Parodi; Giorgio Sammito; Lorenzo Gemignani; Giorgia Bodini; Vincenzo Savarino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  Functional esophageal disorders.

Authors:  Jean Paul Galmiche; Ray E Clouse; András Bálint; Ian J Cook; Peter J Kahrilas; William G Paterson; Andre J P M Smout
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Clinical, but not oesophageal pH-impedance, profiles predict response to proton pump inhibitors in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Kafia Belhocine; Mireille Simon; Maylis Capdepont; François Mion; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Jean-Paul Galmiche
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Sabine Roman; Alain Ropert; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Philippe Pouderoux; Ulriikka Chaput; François Mion; Eric Vérin; Jean-Paul Galmiche; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  NERD: an umbrella term including heterogeneous subpopulations.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Patrizia Zentilin; Vincenzo Savarino
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  The value of early wireless esophageal pH monitoring in diagnosing functional heartburn in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Eun-Young Park; Myung-Gyu Choi; Meonggi Baeg; Chul-Hyun Lim; Jinsu Kim; Yukyung Cho; Jaemyung Park; Inseok Lee; Sangwoo Kim; Kyuyong Choi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring of reflux patterns in non-erosive reflux disease, reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn].

Authors:  Ajing Zhang; Wenzhu Yao; Jia Di; Manli Cui; Mingxin Zhang; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2020-10-30

2.  Rome III, Rome IV, and Potential Asia Symptom Criteria for Functional Dyspepsia Do Not Reliably Distinguish Functional From Organic Disease.

Authors:  Zhongcao Wei; Qian Yang; Qi Yang; Juan Yang; Xinxing Tantai; Xin Xing; Cailan Xiao; Yanglin Pan; Na Liu; Jinhai Wang
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Upright Integrated Relaxation Pressure Predicts Symptom Outcome for Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction.

Authors:  Songfeng Chen; Mengya Liang; Niandi Tan; Mengyu Zhang; Yuqing Lin; Peixian Cao; Qianjun Zhuang; Yinglian Xiao
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.