Literature DB >> 16848801

Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy.

Frank Zerbib1, Sabine Roman, Alain Ropert, Stanislas Bruley des Varannes, Philippe Pouderoux, Ulriikka Chaput, François Mion, Eric Vérin, Jean-Paul Galmiche, Daniel Sifrim.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Combined esophageal pH-impedance monitoring allows detection of nearly all gastroesophageal reflux episodes, acid as well as nonacid. However, the role of nonacid reflux in the pathogenesis of symptoms is poorly known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of this technique in patients with suspected reflux symptoms while on or off PPI therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The recordings of 150 patients recruited at seven academic centers with symptoms possibly related to gastroesophageal reflux were analyzed. Reflux events were detected visually using impedance (Sandhill, CO) and then characterized by pHmetry as acid or nonacid reflux. The temporal relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes was analyzed: a symptom association probability (SAP) > or =95% was considered indicative of a positive association.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were included, 102 women (mean age 52 +/- 14 yr, range 16-84). Among the 79 patients off PPI, five did not report any symptom during the recording period. A positive SAP was found in 41 of the 74 symptomatic patients (55.4%), including acid reflux in 23 (31.1%), nonacid reflux in three (4.1%), and acid and nonacid in 15 (20.3%). In the group of patients on PPI (N = 71, 46 women, mean age 51 +/- 15 yr), 11 were asymptomatic during the study, SAP was positive in 22 of the 60 symptomatic patients (36.7%), including acid reflux in three (5.0%), nonacid reflux in 10 (16.7%), and acid and nonacid in nine (15.0%). The symptoms most frequently associated with nonacid reflux were regurgitation and cough.
CONCLUSION: Adding impedance to pH monitoring improves the diagnostic yield and allows better symptom analysis than pHmetry alone, mainly in patients on PPI therapy. The impact of this improved diagnostic value on gastroesophageal reflux disease management remains to be investigated by outcome studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16848801     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00711.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  108 in total

1.  [Gastroesophageal reflux diseases in childhood. Diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  P Ahrens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Functional heartburn: definition and management strategies.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Mireille Simon; Jean Paul Galmiche
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-06

3.  Different in vitro and in vivo profiles of substituted 3-aminopropylphosphinate and 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinate GABA(B) receptor agonists as inhibitors of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation.

Authors:  A Lehmann; M Antonsson; A Aurell-Holmberg; L A Blackshaw; L Brändén; T Elebring; J Jensen; L Kärrberg; J P Mattsson; K Nilsson; S S Oja; P Saransaari; S von Unge
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Parameters on esophageal pH-impedance monitoring that predict outcomes of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Impedance-pH monitoring in proton pump inhibitor resistant patients: ready for clinical application?

Authors:  J P Galmiche
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  New esophageal function testing (impedance, Bravo pH monitoring, and high-resolution manometry): clinical relevance.

Authors:  Jason A Wilson; Marcelo F Vela
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2008-06

Review 7.  Mucosal Impedance: a New Approach to Diagnosing Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Caroline Barrett; Yash Choksi; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-06-09

Review 8.  Esophageal testing: What we have so far.

Authors:  Nicola de Bortoli; Irene Martinucci; Lorenzo Bertani; Salvatore Russo; Riccardo Franchi; Manuele Furnari; Salvatore Tolone; Giorgia Bodini; Valeria Bolognesi; Massimo Bellini; Vincenzo Savarino; Santino Marchi; Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

9.  Effect of proton pump inhibition on acid, weakly acid and weakly alkaline gastro-esophageal reflux in children.

Authors:  Helena Turk; Bruno Hauser; Jernej Brecelj; Yvan Vandenplas; Rok Orel
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 10.  NERD: an umbrella term including heterogeneous subpopulations.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Patrizia Zentilin; Vincenzo Savarino
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.