Yue-Qin Song1, Hui-Zhong Sun2, Jun Du3. 1. Forestry College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471000, China. 2. Forestry College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471000, China. huizhong66@163.com. 3. Institute of Plant Nutrition and Resource Environment, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Abstract
Tropidothorax elegans Distant (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) is an insect pest that inflicts damage to vegetables and flowering plants across China. The olfactory system regulates insect behavior, such as feeding, mating, oviposition and predator avoidance. Odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) and the chemosensory proteins (CSPs) are two groups of small soluble proteins that initiate olfactory signal transduction in insects. In this study, we generated antennal transcriptomes of male and female T. elegans, and identified 19 putative OBP (14 classic OBPs and five plus-C OBPs) and seven CSP genes. Through real-time quantitative PCR analysis, we found that 14 of the 19 OBP genes were highly expressed in the antennae of both adult females and males, and 3 OBP genes were expressed higher in the antennae of males than females. Some OBP genes were also highly expressed in the legs or wings. Three CSP genes were highly expressed in the antennae of both sexes, and TeleCSP7 showed higher expression in male antennae compare to females. Interestingly, one CSP gene, TeleCSP2, was expressed in all olfactory tissues. Our results provide molecular insights into further investigating of the olfactory system of an important plant pest, T. elegans.
Tropidothorax elegans Distant (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) is an insect pest that inflicts damage to vegetables and flowering plants across China. The olfactory system regulates insect behavior, such as feeding, mating, oviposition and predator avoidance. Odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) and the chemosensory proteins (CSPs) are two groups of small soluble proteins that initiate olfactory signal transduction in insects. In this study, we generated antennal transcriptomes of male and female T. elegans, and identified 19 putative OBP (14 classic OBPs and five plus-C OBPs) and seven CSP genes. Through real-time quantitative PCR analysis, we found that 14 of the 19 OBP genes were highly expressed in the antennae of both adult females and males, and 3 OBP genes were expressed higher in the antennae of males than females. Some OBP genes were also highly expressed in the legs or wings. Three CSP genes were highly expressed in the antennae of both sexes, and TeleCSP7 showed higher expression in male antennae compare to females. Interestingly, one CSP gene, TeleCSP2, was expressed in all olfactory tissues. Our results provide molecular insights into further investigating of the olfactory system of an important plant pest, T. elegans.
The olfactory system plays an important role in regulating behaviors in insects, such as finding food, mating, oviposition and avoiding predators[1,2]. The process of olfactory perception is mediated by a series of proteins that include odorant-binding proteins (OBPs), chemosensory proteins (CSPs), olfactory receptors (ORs), sensory neuron membrane proteins (SNMPs) and olfactory degrading enzymes (ODEs). OBPs and CSPs are produced in the lymph of the chemosensilla and bind to chemical signals from the external environment, then transfer odorants through the sensillar lymph to the ORs, activating signal transduction[2,3]. Therefore OBPs and CSPs are two families of small water-soluble polypeptides in the lymph of chemosensilla and initiate the biochemical recognition of olfactory signals in insect[4-6].All insect OBPs have six highly conversed cysteine residues, paired in three interlocked disulphide bridges[7]. OBPs are classified into five groups: ‘Classic’ OBPs with six Cys residues, ‘dimer’ OBPs with two classical Cys signature motifs, ‘Minus-C’ OBPs that lacks two of the six conserved Cys, ‘Plus-C’ OBPs that has a Pro residue and two additional Cys residues and ‘Atypical’ OBPs with 9–10 Cys residues[5]. OBPs are highly expressed in the antennae, and the primary function of OBPs are to transport odorant molecules to ORs in the antenna[8,9]. However, recent studies have found expression of OBPs in nonsensory organs, such as pheromone glands and reproductive organs. This suggests that OBPs serve an additional function as chemical compound carrier, which may be analogous to the vertebrates urinary and salivary proteins as well as some insect chemosensory proteins[10,11].In contrast to OBPs, CSPs have four conserved Cys residues[5,12]. Initially, these proteins were named as olfactory specific protein D (OS-D)[13] or A10[14], but were then named chemosensory proteins (CSPs). CSPs are expressed in chemosensory tissues, such as antennae[15], maxillary palps[16], proboscis[17], labial palps[16,18], wings[19], legs[20], and non-chemosensory tissues, including pheromone gland[21,22] and ejaculatory bulb[23]. CSPs may play important role as carriers for odorant molecules through the sensillar lymph to transmembrane chemoreceptors but can also be involved in other physiological and behavioral functions.The number of OBPs and CSPs is highly variable even between closely related species. For example, 38 OBPs were identified in Apolygus lucorum Meyer-Dür[9], 33 OBPs in Lygus lineolaris Palisot de Beauvois[8], 28 OBPs and 16 CSPs in Nysius ericae Schilling[24], 16 OBPs and 8 CSPs in Adelphocoris suturalis Jakovlev[25], 14 OBPs and 3 CSPs in Adelphocoris lineolatus Goeze[26,27], 10 OBPs and 5 CSPs in Cyrtorhinus lividipennis Reuter[28], 40 OBPs and 11 CSPs in Empoasca onukii Matsuda[29], 8 OBPs and 13 CSPs in Bemisia tabaci Gennadius[30], 30 OBPs in Halyomorpha halys Stål[31], 9 OBPs and 3 CSPs in Pachypeltis micranthus Mu et Liu[32].Tropidothorax elegans Distant (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) is a polyphagous insect pest that can severely damage commercially important plants, such as locust, pepper, cucurbit, red sage, oilseed rape, Chinese cabbage, and wheat[33]. Insects detect the chemical information of a plant to determine whether it is a suitable host. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the detection of host plants remain elusive. In this study, we identified OBP and CSP genes from T. elegans by screening the antennal transcriptome and subsequently examined their expression in different tissues by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Our results provided resources for further functional characterization of T. elegans OBPs/CSPs.
Results
Identification of CSP and OBP genes in T. elegans
After removing adaptors and low quality reads, a total of 36,445,539 clean reads were obtained with a Q30 percentage of 91.90%. The assembly of all clean reads together led to the generation of 118,998 (mean length 852.84 bp) transcripts and 93,940 (mean length 667.34 bp) unigenes with N50 length of 1,545 and 1,046 bp. We obtained 33,079 unigenes that were longer than 500 bp, which accounted for 35.21% of all unigenes (Table S1).The tBLASTn results showed 19 unigenes encoding putative OBP genes (GenBank Accession Nos. MF593898–MF593916). Of the 19 TeleOBPs that were identified, 17 TeleOBPs had intact ORFs that were 140–383 aa in length, and 15 TeleOBPs had a signal peptide at the N-terminus. Two TeleOBPs (TeleOBP2 and TeleOBP6) were partial sequences with the N-terminus missing. The full-length protein sequences of TeleOBP1–19 had molecular weights of 15.64–23.38 kDa and isoelectric points of 4.27–8.86. BLAST analyses revealed that the TeleOBP sequences were similar to putative OBP sequences identified from other hemipteran species. The highest degree of sequence identity (75%) was found in the putative OBP from the alfalfa plant bug species, A. lineolatus, followed by A. suturalis (53%), L. lineolaris (53%) and Telenomus podisi (53%) (Table 1).
Table 1
Sequence information of TeleOBPs and TeleCSPs.
Gene name
Acc. no.
ORF(aa)
Molecular weight (kDa)
Isoelectric point
Signal peptide
Full length
Best Blastx hit
Gene annotation
Species
Protein ID
Score(bits)
E-volue
identify
TeleOBP1
MF593898
205
22.66
5.18
1–21
yes
OBP7
Adelphocoris suturalis
ANA10233.1
191
3e-58
53%
TeleOBP2
MF593899
102
11.41
5.16
no
No
OBP5
Adelphocoris lineolatus
ACZ58031.1
164
4e-50
75%
TeleOBP3
MF593900
152
17.04
4.27
1–29
yes
OBP3
Euschistus heros
AIU64820.1
85.8
3e-18
36%
TeleOBP4
MF593901
140
15.85
5.43
1–17
yes
OBP4
Chinavia ubica
AIU64827.1
100
3e-24
39%
TeleOBP5
MF593902
383
45.43
7.96
1–23
yes
OBP5
Halyomorpha halys
AOV87022.1
209
2e-61
40%
TeleOBP6
MF593903
156
17.09
8.86
1–13
no
OBP25
Chilo suppressalis
ANC68513.1
56.6
7e-07
29%
TeleOBP7
MF593904
200
22.96
5.4
1–20
yes
OBP3
Sogatella furcifera
AGZ04903.1
64.3
3e-09
32%
TeleOBP8
MF593905
203
22.83
6.34
1–20
yes
OBP31
Apolygus lucorum
AMQ76484.1
104
2e-24
34%
TeleOBP9
MF593906
172
19.11
7.56
no
yes
OBP1
Pachypeltis micranthus
ARO46430.1
82
9e-17
33%
TeleOBP10
MF593907
143
15.64
5.33
1–18
yes
OBP2
Chinavia ubica
AIU64825.1
110
2e-28
42%
TeleOBP11
MF593908
155
17.69
5.26
1–19
yes
OBP4
Chinavia ubica
AIU64827.1
63.2
1e-09
32%
TeleOBP12
MF593909
111
12.56
9.18
no
yes
OBP33
Apolygus lucorum
AMQ76486.1
93.6
4e-22
45%
TeleOBP13
MF593910
175
19.69
4.84
1–17
yes
OBP13
Halyomorpha halys
AOV87030.1
63.5
2e-09
33%
TeleOBP14
MF593911
152
17.07
5.57
1–20
yes
OBP2
Telenomus podisi
AIU64830.1
166
4e-50
53%
TeleOBP15
MF593912
145
16.04
6.31
1–18
yes
OBP15
Halyomorpha halys
AOV87032.1
98.2
2e-23
31%
TeleOBP16
MF593913
152
17.04
5.16
1–19
yes
OBP27
Halyomorpha halys
AOV87044.1
103
2e-25
35%
TeleOBP17
MF593914
140
15.78
4.97
1–22
yes
OBP4
Lygus lineolaris
AHF71031.1
162
4e-49
53%
TeleOBP18
MF593915
262
30.92
7.05
1–20
yes
OBP24
Anopheles funestus
ADQ01710.1
53.1
4e-05
31%
TeleOBP19
MF593916
210
23.38
6.32
1–25
yes
OBP25
Apolygus lucorum
AMQ76478.1
122
2e-31
34%
TeleCSP1
MF598723
134
15.29
8.93
1–21
yes
CSP8
Nilaparvata lugens
ACJ64054.1
149
9e-44
57%
TeleCSP2
MF598724
115
12.88
9.27
1–26
no
CSP13
Lygus hesperus
APB88051.1
96.3
1e-23
42%
TeleCSP3
MF598725
125
14.06
5.59
1–19
yes
CSP3
Apolygus lucorum
AEP95757.1
152
3e-45
58%
TeleCSP4
MF598726
141
16.56
6.41
1–23
yes
CSP4
Adelphocoris suturalis
ANA10246.1
124
3e-34
47%
TeleCSP5
MF598727
127
14.47
4.70
1–17
yes
CSP8
Lygus hesperus
APB88044.1
130
1e-36
48%
TeleCSP6
MF598728
123
13.98
9.18
1–17
yes
CSP3
Apolygus lucorum
AGD80083.1
209
8e-68
86%
TeleCSP7
MF598729
135
15.66
5.74
1–18
yes
CSP8
Lygus hesperus
APB88044.1
119
2e-32
46%
Sequence information of TeleOBPs and TeleCSPs.Except for TeleOBP2 where the 5′ information was missing, the other 18 TeleOBPs contained OBP cysteine patterns that were ‘classic’ OBP or ‘Plus-C’ OBP. Based on the Hemiptera ‘classic’ OBP Cys motif (C1-X15–39-C2-X3-C3-X21–44-C4-X7–12-C5-X8-C6), we classified 13 TeleOBPs (TeleOBP3–6, TeleOBP9–12 and TeleOBP14–18) as ‘classic’ OBPs (Fig. 1). The remaining five TeleOBPs (TeleOBP1, TeleOBP7–8, TeleOBP13 and TeleOBP19) were categorized as ‘Plus-C’ OBPs, because they contained two additional conserved cysteins and a conserved proline immediately after the sixth cysteine (Fig. 2).
Figure 1
Alignment of Tropidothorax elegans ‘classic’ odorant-binding proteins (OBPs). The six conserved cysteine residues are indicated with the letter “c” under the sequence.
Figure 2
Alignment of Tropidothorax elegans ‘Plus-C’ odorant-binding proteins (OBPs). The conserved residues in the ‘Plus-C’ OBPs motif are indicated with the letter “c” under the sequence.
Alignment of Tropidothorax elegans ‘classic’ odorant-binding proteins (OBPs). The six conserved cysteine residues are indicated with the letter “c” under the sequence.Alignment of Tropidothorax elegans ‘Plus-C’ odorant-binding proteins (OBPs). The conserved residues in the ‘Plus-C’ OBPs motif are indicated with the letter “c” under the sequence.We next searched for CSP genes and identified seven putative TeleCSP genes from the T. elegans antennal transcriptome. Aside from TeleCSP2, six TeleCSPs contained complete ORF ranging 115–141 aa. The sequences were named TeleCSP1 to TeleCSP7 (GenBank accession numbers MF585723–MF585729). The full-length protein sequences of TeleCSP1 to TeleCSP7 had molecular weights of 13.96–16.56 kDa and isoelectric points of 4.70–9.18. All TeleCSPs shared high sequence similarities to known hemipteran CSPs, and in particular, TeleCSP6 showed highest identity (86%) with a CSP from A. lucorum (Table 1).All TeleCSP genes contained a 17–26 aa N-terminal signal peptide sequence and a highly conserved four cysteine residues with the spacing pattern C1-X6-C2-X18-C3-X2-C4 (Fig. 3).
Figure 3
Alignment of Tropidothorax elegans chemosensory proteins (CSPs). Four conserved cysteine residues are indicated with the letter “c” under the sequence.
Alignment of Tropidothorax elegans chemosensory proteins (CSPs). Four conserved cysteine residues are indicated with the letter “c” under the sequence.
Phylogenetic analysis
To conduct a phylogenetic analysis of OBPs, we used a total of 160 OBP protein sequences from seven different Hemiptera insects, including the 19 predicted OBPs we identified from T. elegans, 30 OBPs from H. halys, 39 OBPs from A. lucorum, 14 OBPs from A. lineolatus, 39 OBPs from L. lineolaris, 15 OBPs from A. suturalis, and four OBPs from Chinavia ubica. The resulting phylogenetic tree showed that OBPs were segregated into two clades: ‘classic’ OBP and ‘Plus-C’ OBPs. OBPs from the same species but in different OBP family (classic vs Plus-C) were equally divergent from each other. Most T. elegans OBPs were located in the same branch along with the orthologous sequences. However TeleOBP9 and TeleOBP18 had no orthologous sequences and segregated into unique clades (Fig. 4).
Figure 4
Phylogenetic relationships of 160 odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) from seven Hemiptera species: Halyomorpha halys, Apolygus lucorum, Adelphocoris lineolatus, Lygus lineolaris, Adelphocoris suturalis, Chinavia ubica, and Tropidothorax elegans. The branch leading to ‘Plus-C’ odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) is marked in blue.
Phylogenetic relationships of 160 odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) from seven Hemiptera species: Halyomorpha halys, Apolygus lucorum, Adelphocoris lineolatus, Lygus lineolaris, Adelphocoris suturalis, Chinavia ubica, and Tropidothorax elegans. The branch leading to ‘Plus-C’ odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) is marked in blue.We next constructed a phylogenetic tree of CSP protein sequences using 47 CSP sequences from five hemipteran species, including seven CSPs from T. elegans, eight CSPs from A. suturalis, eight CSPs from A. lucorum, 13 CSPs from Lygus hesperus, and 11 CSPs from A. lineolatus. CSPs from the same species were also equally divergent from each other (Fig. 5).
Figure 5
Phylogenetic relationships of 47 chemosensory proteins (CSPs) from five hemipteran species: Adelphocoris suturalis, Apolygus lucorum, Lygus Hesperus, Adelphocoris lineolatus, Tropidothorax elegans.
Phylogenetic relationships of 47 chemosensory proteins (CSPs) from five hemipteran species: Adelphocoris suturalis, Apolygus lucorum, Lygus Hesperus, Adelphocoris lineolatus, Tropidothorax elegans.
Tissue-specific expression of T. elegans OBP and CSP genes
To understand the function of TeleOBPs, we measured relative expression levels of OBP genes in different tissues of T. elegans by RT-qPCR. The antennal transcript levels of 14 TeleOBP genes (TeleOBP1, TeleOBP2, TeleOBP3, TeleOBP4, TeleOBP5, TeleOBP6, TeleOBP9, TeleOBP10, TeleOBP11, TeleOBP12, TeleOBP13, TeleOBP14, TeleOBP15 and TeleOBP19) were significantly higher in both female and male antennae compared to other tissues. Furthermore, the expression levels of TeleOBP2, TeleOBP5 and TeleOBP6 were significantly higher in the antennae of males than the antennae of females. The expression levels of TeleOBP1, TeleOBP4, TeleOBP9, TeleOBP13, TeleOBP14, TeleOBP15 and TeleOBP17 were significantly higher in the female antennae than the male antennae. Interestingly, TeleOBP7, TeleOBP16 and TeleOBP18 were highly expressed in the legs. In addition, the Plus-C OBP TeleOBP8 had highest expression levels in the wings of female and male compared to other tissues (Fig. 6).
Figure 6
Relative expression of TeleOBP genes in female and male adult tissues of Tropidothorax elegans determined by RT-qPCR. TeleActin gene was used as an internal control. Data was normalized to actin expression levels and shown relative to the expression of female thoraxes each gene. Error bars represent standard errors of the means for three biological replicates and different lower cases letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Relative expression of TeleOBP genes in female and male adult tissues of Tropidothorax elegans determined by RT-qPCR. TeleActin gene was used as an internal control. Data was normalized to actin expression levels and shown relative to the expression of female thoraxes each gene. Error bars represent standard errors of the means for three biological replicates and different lower cases letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).Of the seven TeleCSP genes, we found that TeleCSP1, TeleCSP4 and TeleCSP6 expression was highest in the antennae of females and males. TeleCSP3, TeleCSP4 and TeleCSP5 expression levels were significantly higher in the female antennae than the male antennae, while TeleCSP1 and TeleCSP6 expression levels were similar in females and in males. Interestingly, TeleCSP2 was expressed in all olfactory tissues that were analyzed, which were antennae, head, legs and wings (Fig. 7).
Figure 7
Relative expression of TeleCSP genes in female and male adult tissues of Tropidothorax elegans determined by RT-qPCR. TeleActin gene was used as an intermal control. Data was normalized to actin expression levels and shown relative to the expression of female thoraxes each gene. Error bars represent standard errors of the means for three biological replicates and different lower cases letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Relative expression of TeleCSP genes in female and male adult tissues of Tropidothorax elegans determined by RT-qPCR. TeleActin gene was used as an intermal control. Data was normalized to actin expression levels and shown relative to the expression of female thoraxes each gene. Error bars represent standard errors of the means for three biological replicates and different lower cases letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Discussion
Here, we identified 19 candidate OBP genes and seven CSP genes by searching the T. elegans antennal transcriptome. Although the number of OBP genes we identified in T. elegans is lower than other spcies, such as 38 OBPs in A. lucorum[9], 33 OBPs in L. lineolaris[8] and 28 OBPs in N. ericae[24], but was similar to some Hemiptera species, such as 16 OBPs in A. suturalis[25] and 14 OBPs in A. lineolatus[26]. The host range of T. elegans is broad, and there may be more OBP and CSP genes to detect odor molecules. Our analysis would not detect OBPs and CSPs primarily expressed in other tissues, or expressed at very low levels in the antennae, therefore the repertoire of TeleOBPs and TeleCSPs we identified may be incomplete.The number of ‘Plus-C’ OBPs is variable even within the same order. For example, in five Hemiptera insectsL. lineolaris, N. ericae, A. lucorum, A. suturalis and A. lineolatus, the number of ‘Plus-C’ OBPs is 10, 7, 6, 4 and 2, respectively[8,9,24-26]. Here, we identified five ‘Plus-C’ OBPs in T. elegans. The phylogenetic tree of Hemiptera OBPs revealed that except for TeleOBP9, all OBPs of T. elegans were assigned to orthologous Hemiptera OBPs clades. The ‘classic’ and ‘Plus-C’ OBP genes were clearly clustered in two clades, which may be due to the functional divergence of ‘classic’ OBP and ‘Plus-C’ OBP genes during evolution.Expression patterns of OBPs can better help us to understand the function of these proteins. In Hemipterans, OBP genes are primarily expressed in the antenna. For example, 13 of 16 OBPs in A. suturalis[25], 12 of 14 OBPs in A. lineolatus[26], at least 6 of 10 OBPs in Nilaparvata lugens[34], and 21 of 33 OBPs in L. lineolaris[8] are expressed in the antennae. We found that 15 of 19 OBPs in T. elegans showed highest expression levels in the antennae, indicating a vital olfactory role of OBPs. Furthermore, eight TeleOBPs showed female-biased expression and three TeleOBPs showed male-biased expression. The occurrence of sex-biased expression suggests that these OBP genes may be involved in recognition of plant volatiles for oviposition behavior or pheromones[35-37]. OBPs expressed in taste sensilla on legs regulate behavioral adaptation to the host plant in Drosophila sechellia[38,39]. TeleOBP7, TeleOBP16 and TeleOBP18 were highly expressed in the legs, which may be related to host plant adaptation of T. elegans. Interestingly, the Plus-C OBP TeleOBP8 was expressed higher in the wings of females and male than other tissues. OBP expression in non-olfactory tissues, which have been observed in a variety of species, suggests that they also may function as carriers of chemicals during developmental and physiological processes[9].In general, there are fewer CSP genes in Hemiptera insects than OBP genes. For example, there are 28 OBPs and 16 CSPs in N. ericae[24], 16 OBPs and 8 CSPs in A. suturalis[25], 14 OBPs and 3 CSPs in A. lineolatus[26], 10 OBPs and 5 CSPs in C. lividipennis[28], 40 OBPs and 11 CSPs in E. onukii[29], and 9 OBPs and 3 CSPs in P. micranthus[32]. We identified seven CSPs in the antennal transcriptome of T. elegans. In our phylogenetic analysis, we found that there is low amino acid sequence conservation of CSPs among true bugs. Only one of seven TeleCSPs, TeleCSP6, clustered with AlucCSP3 with over 80% amino acid sequence identity. The distribution of CSP orthologs in other hemipterans suggests that CSP genes originating from a common ancestor may have similar functions or that they acquired novel functions via subfunctionalization[9]. These results suggest that CSP proteins in hemipteran insects undergo extensive gene duplication and divergence by natural selection, strongly indicating that they may have diverse functions[40].CSPs play an important role in a variety of biological process, including chemosensation[41], leg regeneration[42,43], and embryonic development[44]. TeleCSP1, TeleCSP4 and TeleCSP6 were expressed highly in the antennae, and maybe involved in recognizing sex pheromones and plant volatiles[27,45,46]. TeleCSP2 was widely expressed in chemosensory and non-chemosensory tissues (antennae, head, legs and wings) and may have different physiological functions in adult tissues.Overall, we generated the transcriptome of the female and male antenna of T. elegans by next-generatioan high throughput sequencing, and identified 19 OBP and seven CSP genes. Furthermore, we identified the gene expression patterns of CSPs and OBPs in different adult tissues. These findings provide important insights into the function of OBP and CSPs, and their role in odorant reception.
Materials and Methods
Insects samples and RNA extraction
A laboratory strain of T. elegans was generated from a population collected on a vegetable field in Luoyang, Henan, China (112-26′E, 34–43′N) in 2014. The population was reared on Metaplexis japonica (Thunb.) in a greenhouse maintained at 25 ± 2 °C, 14 h: 10 h light/dark cycle with 60~80% relative humidity. For the transcriptome, about 500 pairs of 3–4 days old female and male adult antennae were dissected, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until RNA isolation.Total RNA was extracted using the RNAiso Plus kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and treated with RNase-free DNase I (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) to remove residual DNA. The quantity and integrity of RNA was tested using 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis and NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA), Qubit 2.0 (Life Technologies, USA) and Agilent 2100 (Agilent, USA).
Antennal cDNA library construction, sequencing and analysis
Following the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Guide v2 (Illumina), mRNA was enriched using magnetic beads crosslinked to Oligo (dT), and fragmented into small pieces using the fragmentation buffer. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using small mRNA fragments with random primers and reverse transcriptase, and second-strand cDNA synthesis was conducted by adding dNTPs, DNA polymerase I and RNase H. Next, double stranded cDNA was purified with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, USA), and treated for end-repairing, Poly-A tailing and sequencing adapters linking. The size of the fragment was chosen using AMPure XP beads and the cDNA library was constructed by PCR amplification (Veriti® 96-Well Thermal Cycle, Applied Biosystems, USA). The concentration and insert size of the cDNA library were detected using Qubit 2.0 and Agilent 2100, and quantified with q-PCR (CFX-96, Bio-Rad, USA).Sequencing was performed by Genomics Services Lab of the Beijing Novogene Technologies Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) using the Illumina HiSeqTM 4000 platform to generate 150 bp pair-end reads. The raw data processing and base calling were performed using the Illumina instrument software.Homologous sequences were searched using BLASTx and BLASTn against the Nr (non-redundant protein database) and Nt (non-redundant nucleotide sequence database) in NCBI with an E-value cut-off of 1.0 e-5.
Identification OBP of and CSP genes
Putative TeleOBP and TeleCSP genes were identified by searching odorant binding protein and chemosensory protein keywords in the annotated unigenes, and by using BLAST. Annotated OBP and CSP genes from other Hemipteran species, such as A. suturalis Jakovlev, A. lineolatus Goeze, A. lucorum Meyer-Dür, N. ericae Schilling, Halyomorpha halys Stål, and L. lineolaris Palisot de Beauvois were used as references. The putative T. elegans OBP and CSP genes were confirmed by searching against the NCBI non-redundant (nr) protein database using BlastX with cut-off E-value of 10–5.
Bioinformatic analysis
Signal peptides were predicted using SignalP 4.1 server[47] (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/). The similarity searches were performed using NCBI BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Multiple sequence alignment was conducted using DNAMAN 6.0. Amino acid sequence alignments of the matured OBPs and CSPs from T. elegans and other Hemipteran species were performed using MAFFT (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/clustering.html), and phylogenetic trees were constructed using PhyML[48] in Seaview v.4 using the Jones-Taylor-Thomton (JTT) model with 1000-fold bootstrap replication in neighbor-joining method (NJ).
Tissue specific expression of OBPs and CSPs
Antennae (300 pairs), heads (without antennae) (180), thoraxes (120), abdomens (50), legs (300 pairs) and wings (200 pairs) of male and female adults at 3-day after eclosion were excised and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. All total RNA samples were extracted using the RNAiso Plus kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and the isolated RNA was transcribed to first-strand cDNA by PrimeScriptTM RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The nucleotide sequences of all 19 TeleOBPs and 7 TeleCSPs were confirmed by cloning and sequencing (Figure S1). Real-time quantitative PCRs (RT-qPCRs) were performed with SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM II (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The T. elegans actin gene (Genbank accession no. MG322127) was used as control. Each reaction was performed with 200 ng/μl cDNA sample. Primers for RT-qPCR were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software and are listed in Table S2. The RT-qPCR reactions were conducted in 20 μL reaction mixtures containing 10 μL SYBR Premix Ex Taq II, 20 ng cDNA templates, 0.2 μM of each primer, and nuclease-free water. The cycling conditions were: one cycle of 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 55 °C for 30 s. Melt curve conditions were 95 °C for 10 s, 65 °C for 30 s. A no-template control (NTC) was also included to detect possible contamination. Three biological replicates were analysed and relative expression levels of OBP and CSP genes across the samples were measured using the 2−∆∆ method[49]. The differences in the expression of TeleOBP and TeleCSP genes between female and male tissues were compared by a one-way nested analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s honestly significance difference (HSD) test using SPSS (SPSS Institute 17.0, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).
Authors: P Nagnan-Le Meillour; A H Cain; E Jacquin-Joly; M C François; S Ramachandran; R Maida; R A Steinbrecht Journal: Chem Senses Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 3.160
Authors: Brenda Torres-Huerta; Obdulia L Segura-León; Marco A Aragón-Magadan; Héctor González-Hernández Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 4.379