| Literature DB >> 29772675 |
Pin-Hui Li1, Li-Heng Liu2, Cheng-Chung Chang3, Rong Gao4, Chung-Hang Leung5, Dik-Lung Ma6, Hui-Min David Wang7,8,9.
Abstract
Melanogenesis is a complex physiological mechanism involving various paracrine factors. Skin cells such as keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and melanocytes communicate with one another through secreted regulators, thereby regulating the melanocytes' bio-functions. The stem cell factor (SCF) is a paracrine factor produced by fibroblasts, and its receptor, c-kit, is expressed on melanocytes. Binding of SCF to c-kit activates autophosphorylation and tyrosine kinase to switch on its signal transmission. SCF inhibition does not suppress fibroblast proliferation in MTT assay, and SCF silencing induced mRNA expressions of paracrine factor genes, HGF, NRG-1, and CRH in qPCR results. Following UVB stimulation, gene expressions of HGF, NRG, and CRH were higher than homeostasis; in particular, HGF exhibited the highest correlation with SCF variations. We detected fibroblasts regulated SCF in an autocrine-dependent manner, and the conditioned medium obtained from fibroblast culture was applied to treat melanocytes. Melanogenesis-related genes, tyrosinase and pmel17, were upregulated under conditioned mediums with SCF silencing and exposed to UVB treatments. Melanin quantities in the melanocytes had clearly increased in the pigment content assay. In conclusion, SCF silencing causes variations in both fibroblast paracrine factors and melanocyte melanogenesis, and the differences in gene expressions were observed following UVB exposure.Entities:
Keywords: fibroblasts; melanin; melanocytes; paracrine factors; stem cell factor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29772675 PMCID: PMC5983634 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19051475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Validation of fibroblasts after SCF targeted siRNA 25 nM transfection for 48 h. (a) The 75% gene knockdown efficiency of SCF in fibroblasts; (b) Fibroblasts were treated with 25 nM SCF-targeted siRNA for 48 h, and the proliferation was assessed by MTT assay; (c) Phase-contrast images compared between control and SCF gene knockdown fibroblasts (100×). The data are presented as means ± SD; n = 3, * p < 0.05.
Figure 2The influences on paracrine factors secreted by fibroblasts were compared between the vehicle control, UVB only, SCF knockdown, and SCF knockdown with UVB exposure groups. The data are presented as means ± SD; n = 3, * p < 0.05.
Figure 3The effects of different conditioned media on the mRNA expression levels were compared with regular fibroblasts, fibroblasts simulated UVB, fibroblasts with SCF knockdown, and fibroblasts exposed UVB with SCF gene silenced. The data are presented as means ± SD; n = 3, * p < 0.05.
Figure 4(a) The melanin content in melanocytes after being treated with conditioned medium from fibroblast cells for 24 h; (b) The morphology of melanocytes was altered (bar = 125 μm). Red arrows showed the melanocytes with dendricity shape morphology. The data are presented as means ± SD; n = 3, * p < 0.05.
Figure 5Autocrine of SCF on fibroblasts. (a) The expression of c-kit on fibroblast; (b) Fibroblasts treated with SCF 30 ng, mastinib 3 μM, and both of mastinib and SCF. The data are presented as means ± SD; n = 3. * p < 0.015.
Figure 6The mRNA pathway of SCF in fibroblasts affects the melanogenesis in melanocytes.
SCF-targeted siRNA sequences used in this study.
| Target sequence 1: GGAAUCGUGUGACUAUAA |
| Target sequence 2: AUAAGUAUGUUGCAAGAGA |
| Target sequence 3: UAAGCGAGAUGGUAGUACA |
| Target sequence 4: GCUUUAUAGUUGCCGAUUA |
The primer sequences used in this study.
| SCF |
| Forward: 5′-CTGCCAACGATCCTATCTTCCT-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-GGTTATGTCCAATGGGTGCATT-3′ |
| HGF |
| Forward: 5′-TCCCTACCTCTCTCGCTGTCT-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-GGGTAAGGGCCAGCATGTA-3′ |
| DKK-1 |
| Forward: 5′-GCGGGAATAAGTACCAGACCAT-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-TGCAGGCGAGACAGATTTG-3′ |
| NRG |
| Forward: 5′-AGGCCAGGACCCTATTATTTC-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-TTCAGATTGAGCCCTAGAGACA-3′ |
| CRH |
| Forward: 5′-AGGCACCGGAGAGAGAAAG-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-GTTTCCTGTTGCTGTGAGCTT-3′ |
| ET-1 |
| Forward: 5′-TGGTTCCTGACTGGCAAAG-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-GGAAGCCAGTGAAGATGGTT-3′ |
| Tyrosinase |
| Forward: 5′-CTGCCAACGATCCTATCTTCCT-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-GGTTATGTCCAATGGGTGCATT-3′ |
| MITF |
| Forward: 5′-TTGGTGCCACCTAAAACATTGT-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-CCGTTGGGCTTGCTGTATG-3′ |
| ERK-1 |
| Forward: 5′-CAACACCACCTGCGACCTT-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-GCCACATACTCCGTCAGGAA-3′ |
| ERK-2 |
| Forward: 5′-CGGTGTTCTTCTTCCCAGTTC-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-AAAGCCACAACTACCAGAAACC-3′ |
| Pmel17 |
| Forward: 5′-GGATGGTACAGCCACCTTAAGG-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-CAGGATCTCGGCACTTTCAATAC-3′ |
| Myo5a |
| Forward: 5′-GCCCAGATTGTGAAAGTGTTGA-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-CCTGTCTCGTAAACGCATCTGT-3′ |