Literature DB >> 29771547

Individual differences in loss aversion and preferences for skewed risks across adulthood.

Kendra L Seaman1, Mikella A Green1, Stephen Shu2, Gregory R Samanez-Larkin3.   

Abstract

In a previous study, we found adult age differences in the tendency to accept more positively skewed gambles (with a small chance of a large win) than other equivalent risks, or an age-related positive-skew bias. In the present study, we examined whether loss aversion explained this bias. A total of 508 healthy participants (ages 21-82) completed measures of loss aversion and skew preference. Age was not related to loss aversion. Although loss aversion was a significant predictor of gamble acceptance, it did not influence the age-related positive-skew bias. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29771547      PMCID: PMC6002928          DOI: 10.1037/pag0000261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  19 in total

1.  Decisions, decisions: analysis of age, cohort, and time of testing on framing of risky decision options.

Authors:  Christopher B Mayhorn; Arthur D Fisk; Justin D Whittle
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Framing effects in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Sunghan Kim; David Goldstein; Lynn Hasher; Rose T Zacks
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Neural antecedents of the endowment effect.

Authors:  Brian Knutson; G Elliott Wimmer; Scott Rick; Nick G Hollon; Drazen Prelec; George Loewenstein
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Utility functions predict variance and skewness risk preferences in monkeys.

Authors:  Wilfried Genest; William R Stauffer; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Age differences in the effect of framing on risky choice: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Best; Neil Charness
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-06-22

6.  Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rui Mata; Anika K Josef; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Forewarning reduces fraud susceptibility in vulnerable consumers.

Authors:  Susanne Scheibe; Nanna Notthoff; Josephine Menkin; Lee Ross; Doug Shadel; Martha Deevy; Laura L Carstensen
Journal:  Basic Appl Soc Psych       Date:  2014

8.  The affective impact of financial skewness on neural activity and choice.

Authors:  Charlene C Wu; Peter Bossaerts; Brian Knutson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Deconstructing risk: separable encoding of variance and skewness in the brain.

Authors:  Mkael Symmonds; Nicholas D Wright; Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Individual differences in skewed financial risk-taking across the adult life span.

Authors:  Kendra L Seaman; Josiah K Leong; Charlene C Wu; Brian Knutson; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.282

View more
  3 in total

1.  Predicting the behavioural tendency of loss aversion.

Authors:  Jianmin Zeng; Yujiao Wang; Jing Zeng; Zhipeng Cao; Hong Chen; Yijun Liu; Qinglin Zhang; Li Su
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Age differences in option choice: Is the option framing effect observed among older adults?

Authors:  Kouhei Masumoto; Min Tian; Kenta Yamamoto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-29

3.  Age Influences Loss Aversion Through Effects on Posterior Cingulate Cortical Thickness.

Authors:  Zoe R Guttman; Dara G Ghahremani; Jean-Baptiste Pochon; Andy C Dean; Edythe D London
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.