Literature DB >> 29770589

Short-term Follow-up of Antibiotic-loaded Articulating Cement Spacers in Two-stage Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series.

Meng-Qiang Tian1, Xian-Teng Yang2,3, Xiao-Bin Tian2, Yun-Bo Sun1, Yuan-Hui Duan1, Li Sun2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Infection of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare but devastating complication. Two-stage revision is an effective treatment for late infected TKA. This study aimed to assess the short-term results of two-stage revision using articulating antibiotic-loaded spacers.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients (10 men and 15 women) were diagnosed with late infections after TKA and treated with two-stage revision from April 2006 to August 2010; 19 of these patients had TKA for osteoarthritis and 6 for rheumatoid arthritis. Median age was 64.9 (range, 56-83) years. In the first-stage surgery, the prosthesis and all bone cement was removed. After thorough debridement, bone cement with vancomycin and tobramycin was put into a die cavity and made into temporary femoral and tibial spacers, respectively. In the cases of good knee range of motion, the temporary spacers were affixed to the bone surface using the same antibiotic bone cement. In the second surgery, gentamycin Refobacin Bone Cement with vancomycin was used to fix the prosthesis. After two-stage revision, patients were followed up clinically and radiologically at 1, 3, and 6 months, and then annually. Knee Society Score (KSS), knee function score, knee pain score, and knee range of motion (ROM) were assessed.
RESULTS: Among the group, all spacers were easily removed, and bone defect degree showed no obvious change compared with pre-implant, 24 (96%) patients had been debrided once, and 1 patient had been debrided twice before reimplant prosthesis. Mean follow-up was 64.2 (range, 52-89) months. There was no infection recurrence at final follow-up. Compared with preoperative data, the KSS (66 [59, 71], 83 [80, 88] vs 46 [43, 57], P < 0.01), knee function score (43 [42, 49], 78 [73, 82] vs 32 [25, 37], P < 0.01), knee pain score (34 [33, 37], 42 [40, 45] vs 18 [16, 23], P < 0.01), and knee ROM (92° [86°, 96°], 94° [90°, 98°] vs 78° [67°, 86°], P < 0.01) were all improved during follow-up and at final visit. Three patients experienced complications in the interval period: one case had knee dislocation, one had knee instability, and one had a chip in the femoral component of the spacer.
CONCLUSION: Using articulating antibiotic-loaded spacers showed benefits for treating infected TKA in selected patients. No infection recurrence was observed during follow-up.
© 2018 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Articulating spacer; Bone cement; Delayed infection; Total knee arthroplasty; Two-stage revision

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29770589      PMCID: PMC6594512          DOI: 10.1111/os.12381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.071


  30 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of infection after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dean T Tsukayama; Victor M Goldberg; Richard Kyle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Biofilm theory can guide the treatment of device-related orthopaedic infections.

Authors:  J William Costerton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infection associated with total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Quanjun Cui; William M Mihalko; John S Shields; Michael Ries; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Technique and timing of two-stage exchange for infection in TKA.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Michael A Kelly; Arlen D Hanssen; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Comparative activity of linezolid and other new agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and teicoplanin-intermediate coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  C Betriu; M Redondo; A Boloix; M Gómez; E Culebras; J J Picazo
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Comparison of a static with a mobile spacer in total knee infection.

Authors:  Roger H Emerson; Michael Muncie; Tiffera R Tarbox; Linda L Higgins
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Effective bactericidal activity of tobramycin and vancomycin eluted from acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  A González Della Valle; M Bostrom; B Brause; C Harney; E A Salvati
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-06

9.  In vitro evaluation of antibiotic release from and bacteria growth inhibition by antibiotic-loaded acrylic bone cement spacers.

Authors:  Konstantinos Anagnostakos; Jens Kelm; Thilo Regitz; Eduard Schmitt; Werner Jung
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.368

10.  Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacer.

Authors:  R M Dominic Meek; Bassam A Masri; David Dunlop; Donald S Garbuz; Nelson V Greidanus; Robert McGraw; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  6 in total

1.  Release characteristics of enoxaparin sodium-loaded polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.

Authors:  Hui Sun; Xinzhe Ma; Zhiyong Li; Jianning Liu; Wei Wang; Xiangbei Qi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  Elution and Biomechanical Properties of Meropenem-Loaded Bone Cement.

Authors:  Li-Hong Wang; Ya-Dong Feng; Xiao-Wei Zhang; Long Jin; Fang-Lun Zhou; Guo-Hong Xu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 3.  Articular spacers in two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection of the hip and the knee.

Authors:  Andy Craig; S W King; B H van Duren; V T Veysi; S Jain; J Palan
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 4.  Are Static Spacers Superior to Articulated Spacers in the Staged Treatment of Infected Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michele Fiore; Andrea Sambri; Matteo Filippini; Lorenzo Morante; Claudio Giannini; Azzurra Paolucci; Claudia Rondinella; Renato Zunarelli; Pierluigi Viale; Massimiliano De Paolis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  A Mid-term Follow-up Study on the Reimplantation of Autoclaved Femoral and Tibial Components as Spacers for Treating Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peng Li; Zhiqi Zhu; Xiangyang Tang; Zhanjun Shi
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  The Inverse Spacer-A Novel, Safe, and Cost-Effective Approach in Routine Procedures for Revision Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kristoff Hammerich; Jens Pollack; Alexander F Hasse; André El Saman; René Huber; Markus Rupp; Volker Alt; Raimund W Kinne; Joerg Mika
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.