Literature DB >> 29769802

WHO height charts can be safely substituted when calculating BP Z-scores in a North American clinic setting.

Celia J Rodd1, Daniel L Metzger2, Atul K Sharma1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Public Health Agency of Canada has officially adopted growth charts from the World Health Organization (WHO); nevertheless, North American blood pressure (BP) Z-scores and percentiles still depend on height Z-scores based on growth charts from the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which may differ significantly, particularly in toddlers. Since many practitioners simply replace CDC height scores with WHO equivalents for diagnosing hypertension, we explore the impact of this substitution on BP Z-scores in real-world BPs measured on more than 22,000 children aged 2 to 18 years.
METHODS: We report agreement between two different measures of the same quantity as Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA).
RESULTS: In toddlers aged 2 to 5 years, WHO height Z-scores are systematically lower with a bias (mean error) of -0.30 SD, and the 95% LOA range from -0.51 to -0.10 SD. Despite this difference, systolic BP Z-scores were nearly identical (bias = 0.06, LOA = 0.02 to 0.10). For older children and diastolic BP Z-scores, the errors were smaller still, and agreement was equally good for hypotensive, normotensive and hypertensive measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians may safely use WHO height charts when calculating BP Z-scores or percentiles against the National Institute of Health's National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute reference data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDC; Height; Hypertension; WHO growth charts

Year:  2017        PMID: 29769802      PMCID: PMC5951106          DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxx185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Child Health        ISSN: 1205-7088            Impact factor:   2.253


  5 in total

1.  The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Comparison of the WHO child growth standards and the CDC 2000 growth charts.

Authors:  Mercedes de Onis; Cutberto Garza; Adelheid W Onyango; Elaine Borghi
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Blood pressure percentiles by age and height from nonoverweight children and adolescents in Germany.

Authors:  Hannelore K Neuhauser; Michael Thamm; Ute Ellert; Hans Werner Hense; Angelika Schaffrath Rosario
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Extending World Health Organization weight-for-age reference curves to older children.

Authors:  Celia Rodd; Daniel L Metzger; Atul Sharma
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.125

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.