| Literature DB >> 29769615 |
Xiaofang Wang1,2, Wenying Cai1, A H G Gerrits van den Ende3, Junmin Zhang1, Ting Xie4, Liyan Xi1,5, Xiqing Li6, Jiufeng Sun7, Sybren de Hoog3,8,9,10.
Abstract
Indoor wet cells serve as an environmental reservoir for a wide diversity of melanized fungi. A total of 313 melanized fungi were isolated at five locations in Guangzhou, China. Internal transcribed spacer (rDNA ITS) sequencing showed a preponderance of 27 species belonging to 10 genera; 64.22% (n = 201) were known as human opportunists in the orders Chaetothyriales and Venturiales, potentially causing cutaneous and sometimes deep infections. Knufia epidermidis was the most frequently encountered species in bathrooms (n = 26), while in kitchens Ochroconis musae (n = 14), Phialophora oxyspora (n = 12) and P. europaea (n = 10) were prevalent. Since the majority of species isolated are common agents of cutaneous infections and are rarely encountered in the natural environment, it is hypothesized that indoor facilities explain the previously enigmatic sources of infection by these organisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29769615 PMCID: PMC5955924 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26071-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The workflow of sampling and isolation. The black biofilms samples from particular areas of bathroom, kitchen, refrigerator rubber seal, and washing machine were taken by using sterile cotton swabs; the black biofilm materials were cultured on PDA medium (200 mg/L chloramphenicol and 200 mg/L cycloheximide) for 2 weeks. Susceptive black yeast like single colony strains were taken for further culture under same condition as above.
Summary of samples and strains in different regions of Guangzhou, China.
| Yue Xiu | Li Wan | Bai Yun | Tian He | Hai Zhu | In total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total samples (%)a | 45 (8.84%) | 93 (18.28%) | 33 (6.49%) | 32 (6.29%) | 306 (60.12%) | 509 |
| Positive samples (%)b | 43 (10.78%) | 86 (21.56%) | 28 (7.02%) | 26 (6.52%) | 216 (54.14%) | 399 |
| Strains (%)c | 32 (10.23%) | 56 (17.90%) | 20 (6.39%) | 23 (7.35%) | 182 (58.15%) | 313 |
| Positive isolation percentage (%)d | 61.50% |
apercentage of samples in each regions versus total samples.
bpercentage of melanized fungi culturing positive samples in each regions versus total positive samples.
cpercentage of identified strains in each regions versus total strians.
dpercentage of total strains versus total samples in each regions.
Strains isolated in different regions of Guangzhou, China in this study (n = 313).
| Families in each region | Haizhu | Liwan | Baiyun | Yuexiu | Tianhe | In total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 11 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| 12 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 14 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 15 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 38 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 39 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 41 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 42 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| 47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| 51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Strains (%)a | 182 (58.15%) | 56 (17.90%) | 20 (6.39%) | 32 (10.23%) | 23 (7.35%) | 313 |
aPercentage of identified strains in each region versus total number of strains.
Species identification of the black yeast-like fungi (n = 313).
| Order | Genus | Species | Isolates (n) | Positive (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18 | 5.94% | ||
|
| 13 | 4.15% | ||
|
| 10 | 3.19% | ||
|
| 9 | 2.88% | ||
|
| 9 | 2.88% | ||
| 1 | 0.32% | |||
|
| 5 | 1.60% | ||
|
| 3 | 0.96% | ||
| 3 | 0.93% | |||
| 2 | 0.64% | |||
|
| 2 | 0.64% | ||
| 1 | 0.32% | |||
| 1 | 0.32% | |||
|
| 37 | 11.82% | ||
|
| 25 | 7.99% | ||
|
| 18 | 5.75% | ||
|
| 1 | 0.32% | ||
| 5 | 1.60% | |||
| 2 | 0.64% | |||
|
| 7 | 2.24% | ||
| 2 | 0.64% | |||
| 1 | 0.32% | |||
|
| 1 | 0.32% | ||
| 1 | 0.32% | |||
|
| 32 | 10.22% | ||
| 6 | 1.92% | |||
|
| 21 | 6.93% | ||
| 13 | 4.15% | |||
|
| 3 | 0.96% | ||
|
| 5 | 1.60% | ||
| 2 | 0.64% | |||
| unclassified (n = 54) | unclassified (n = 54) | unknown | 54 | 17.25% |
| Total | 10 | 27 | 313 | 100% |
Strains distribution in each isolation location in this study (n = 313).
| Families | Bathroom | Kitchen | Refrigerator | Washing machine | Water dispenser |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 12 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 14 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 30 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 40 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 41 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 42 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 43 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 44 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 46 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 47 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 48 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 49 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 50 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 51 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 52 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 53 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 147 (46.96%) | 116 (37.06%) | 32 (10.22%) | 17 (5.43%) | 1 (0.32%) |
Quantity and percentage of species in different sampled locations (n = 313).
| Name | Total strain number | Kitchen | Bathroom | Refrigerator/rubber seal | Water dispenser | Washing machine/rubber seal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 13 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 9 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 37 | 8 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
|
| 25 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 18 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 32 | 14 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 13 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | |
|
| 21 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 2 |
|
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Unknown species | 54 | 20 | 29 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 313 | 116 | 147 | 32 | 1 | 17 |
| Percentage | 100% | 37.06% | 46.96% | 10.22% | 0.32% | 5.43% |