| Literature DB >> 29768530 |
Caio César de Melo Freire1, Giuseppe Palmisano2, Carla T Braconi3, Fernanda R Cugola4, Fabiele B Russo4, Patricia Cb Beltrão-Braga4,5, Atila Iamarino3, Daniel Ferreira de Lima Neto3, Amadou Alpha Sall6, Livia Rosa-Fernandes7, Martin R Larsen7, Paolo Marinho de Andrade Zanotto3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Zika virus (ZIKV) was recognised as a zoonotic pathogen in Africa and southeastern Asia. Human infections were infrequently reported until 2007, when the first known epidemic occurred in Micronesia. After 2013, the Asian lineage of ZIKV spread along the Pacific Islands and Americas, causing severe outbreaks with millions of human infections. The recent human infections of ZIKV were also associated with severe complications, such as an increase in cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome and the emergence of congenital Zika syndrome.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29768530 PMCID: PMC5942634 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760170385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Fig. 1: relative synonymous codon usage analysis (RSCU) for the polyprotein coding region shows that the principal component analysis (PCA) based on RSCU agrees with the phylogenetic distinctions between the two Zika virus (ZIKV) lineages. The African (red) and Asian (blue) lineages were colour-coded accordingly. The biplot arrows indicate the preferred codons from each lineage. The ellipses delimit the groups with 95% of confidence on the biplots for PCA based on the preferential usage of codons that is lineage-specific.
Codon adaptation index (CAI) for each gene of Zika virus lineages
| Gene | Median CAI for human | p-value* | Median CAI for | p-value* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| African | Asian | African | Asian | |||
| C | 0.801 | 0.8 | 0.953 | 0.733 | 0.729 | 0.141 |
| PrM | 0.791 | 0.802 | 5.377E-5 | 0.751 | 0.738 | 5.499E-4 |
| E | 0.82 | 0.809 | 9.819E-6 | 0.738 | 0.724 | 9.423E-6 |
| NS1 | 0.817 | 0.833 | 1.389E-6 | 0.733 | 0.745 | 8.059E-7 |
| NS2A | 0.786 | 0.794 | 0.0502 | 0.71 | 0.732 | 1.021E-6 |
| NS2B | 0.79 | 0.769 | 1.281E-6 | 0.703 | 0.716 | 1.734E-5 |
| NS3 | 0.807 | 0.799 | 7.573E-4 | 0.727 | 0.715 | 1.892E-6 |
| NS4A | 0.776 | 0.775 | 0.8345 | 0.688 | 0.712 | 2.072E-6 |
| NS4B | 0.803 | 0.793 | 2.999E-3 | 0.708 | 0.705 | 0.4896 |
| NS5 | 0.821 | 0.801 | 6.727E-7 | 0.753 | 0.738 | 7.563E-7 |
*: calculated with Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Fig. 2: codon adaptation index (CAI) for Zika virus (ZIKV) genes. (A) Distribution of CAI values calculated with codon usage table based on human housekeeping genes for each ZIKV gene. (B) CAI values based on Aedes aegypti genes. The African (red) and Asian (blue) lineages are colour-coded accordingly. The curves show sliding-window of the CAI analyses results for both, (i) the complete ZIKV polyprotein open reading frame and (ii) for each individual gene shown in colour-coded boxplots. Median, 1st and 3rd quartiles are shown in boxes and the whiskers represent the interquartile range times 1.5.
Fig. 3: NS1 gene codon usage and demographic dynamics of Zika virus (ZIKV). (A) NS1 gene codon adaptation index (CAI) to the human housekeeping genes for the African (red dots) and Asian (blue dots) lineages. (B) Malthusian fitness (WM) estimated for ZIKV since 1947, representing decrease (wM <1), constant population size (wM = 1), and net growth (wM > 1). The red arrow indicates the end of African lineage sampling.
Fig. 4: stoichiometric ratio between proteins produced during infection experiments with the African (ZAF) and Brazilian ZIKV (ZBR) lineage analysed by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Tryptic peptides were quantified using TMT10plex isobaric labeling and assembled into proteins. The relative expression of each viral protein from ZBR and ZAF lineages were reported as ZBR/ZAF ratio. The relative expression of 4842 human proteins identified in neurospheres infected with ZAF and ZBR was reported (data available from: https://github.com/CaioFreire/CUB). The average ratio (ZBR vs ZAF) of the human proteins is equal to 1.