Literature DB >> 29768281

Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty in Patients with Glaucoma: 1-Year Results from a Multicentre Prospective Study.

Giuseppe Giannaccare1, Aldo Vagge2, Stefano Sebastiani3, Lara E Urbini4, Paolo Corazza2, Marco Pellegrini3, Luciana Carmassi4, Fulvio Bergamini4, Carlo E Traverso2, Emilio C Campos3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound cyclo-plasty (UCP) for reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with glaucoma.
METHODS: This is a multicentre prospective study conducted in 3 Italian glaucoma centres. UCP was performed by EyeOP1, which delivers ultrasound beams using 6 piezoelectric transducers activated for 4/6 s (first generation) or 8 s (second generation). Primary outcomes were the mean IOP reduction and the rates of success after 1 year. Secondary outcomes were the mean IOP reduction at each follow-up, and the reduction of the number of hypotensive medications.
RESULTS: In total, 49 eyes from 47 patients were treated. One year postoperatively, the mean IOP had decreased from 27.7 ± 9.2 to 19.8 ± 6.9 mm Hg (p < 0.001), and the mean number of hypotensive drops and tablets had decreased from 3.2 and 0.5 to 2.3 and 0.2, respectively (p < 0.05). Postoperative IOP reduction was significantly related to preoperative IOP (r2 = 0.5034; p < 0.0001). Second-generation probes determined a significantly higher IOP reduction (p < 0.05). Qualified success was achieved in 25 eyes (51.1%) and complete success in 21 (42.9%), while failure was recorded in 12 (24.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: UCP is safe and effective for reducing IOP. The procedure determines a greater IOP reduction in patients with higher preoperative IOP. Second-generation probes improve outcomes without detrimental effects on safety.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ciliary body; Glaucoma; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Intraocular pressure; Ultrasound cyclo-plasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29768281     DOI: 10.1159/000487953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Res        ISSN: 0030-3747            Impact factor:   2.892


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of Scleral and Conjunctival Thickness of the Eye after Ultrasound Ciliary Plasty.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Bolek; Adam Wylęgała; Edward Wylęgała
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Cycloplasty: Analysis of Pupil Dynamics.

Authors:  David C Sousa; Nuno P Ferreira; Carlos Marques-Neves; Alix Somers; Evelien Vandewalle; Ingeborg Stalmans; Luís Abegão Pinto
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2018 Sep-Dec

3.  Phaco-UCP; combined phacoemulsification and ultrasound ciliary plasty versus phacoemulsification alone for management of coexisting cataract and open angle glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Magda A Torky; Yousef A Alzafiri; Ameera G Abdelhameed; Eman A Awad
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Postoperative complicated peripheral cortical cataract after ultrasound cycloplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Jihan Luo; Zhen Liu; Lin Zhao; Yi Zhou; Li Kong; Yang Sun
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound cyclo-plasty in glaucoma.

Authors:  Di Chen; Xiu-Juan Guo; Shu-Ke Luo; Yan Lu; Xiu-Rong Tang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  A Comparative Study between Ultrasound Cycloplasty and Cyclocryotherapy for the Treatment of Neovascular Glaucoma.

Authors:  Wang Ruixue; Wang Tao; Li Ning
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.