Literature DB >> 29766458

Cerebellar-Stimulation Evoked Prefrontal Electrical Synchrony Is Modulated by GABA.

Xiaoming Du1, Laura M Rowland2, Ann Summerfelt2, Fow-Sen Choa3, George F Wittenberg4,5, Krista Wisner2, Andrea Wijtenburg2, Joshua Chiappelli2, Peter Kochunov2, L Elliot Hong2.   

Abstract

Cerebellar-prefrontal connectivity has been recognized as important for behaviors ranging from motor coordination to cognition. Many of these behaviors are known to involve excitatory or inhibitory modulations from the prefrontal cortex. We used cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) to probe cerebellar-evoked electrical activity in prefrontal cortical areas and used magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) measures of prefrontal GABA and glutamate levels to determine if they are correlated with those potentials. Cerebellar-evoked bilateral prefrontal synchrony in the theta to gamma frequency range showed patterns that reflect strong GABAergic inhibitory function (r = - 0.66, p = 0.002). Stimulation of prefrontal areas evoked bilateral prefrontal synchrony in the theta to low beta frequency range that reflected, conversely, glutamatergic excitatory function (r = 0.66, p = 0.002) and GABAergic inhibitory function (r = - 0.65, p = 0.002). Cerebellar-evoked prefrontal synchronization had opposite associations with cognition and motor coordination: it was positively associated with working memory performance (r = 0.57, p = 0.008) but negatively associated with coordinated motor function as measured by rapid finger tapping (r = - 0.59, p = 0.006). The results suggest a relationship between regional GABA levels and interregional effects on synchrony. Stronger cerebellar-evoked prefrontal synchrony was associated with better working memory but surprisingly worse motor coordination, which suggests competing effects for motor activity and cognition. The data supports the use of a TMS-EEG-MRS approach to study the neurochemical basis of large-scale oscillations modulated by the cerebellar-prefrontal connectivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebellar-frontal; Cerebellum; EEG; MRS; Oscillation; TMS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29766458      PMCID: PMC6237666          DOI: 10.1007/s12311-018-0945-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  111 in total

1.  Cerebellar projections to the prefrontal cortex of the primate.

Authors:  F A Middleton; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A mechanism for generation of long-range synchronous fast oscillations in the cortex.

Authors:  R D Traub; M A Whittington; I M Stanford; J G Jefferys
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Abbreviating the Finger Tapping Test.

Authors:  Lee Ashendorf; Julie E Horwitz; Brandon E Gavett
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.813

4.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP.

Authors:  H V Semlitsch; P Anderer; P Schuster; O Presslich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation impairs verbal working memory.

Authors:  John E Desmond; S H Annabel Chen; Perry B Shieh
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Network-targeted cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation improves attentional control.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Michelle Thai; Hidefusa Okabe; Joseph DeGutis; Elyana Saad; Simon E Laganiere; Mark A Halko
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Reproducibility of prefrontal γ-aminobutyric acid measurements with J-edited spectroscopy.

Authors:  Matthew Geramita; Jan Willem van der Veen; Alan S Barnett; Antonina A Savostyanova; Jun Shen; Daniel R Weinberger; Stefano Marenco
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  GABAA responses in hippocampal neurons are potentiated by glutamate.

Authors:  A Stelzer; R K Wong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-01-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  The cerebellum and cognitive function: 25 years of insight from anatomy and neuroimaging.

Authors:  Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Characterizing the Cortical Oscillatory Response to TMS Pulse.

Authors:  Maria Concetta Pellicciari; Domenica Veniero; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.505

View more
  7 in total

1.  Non-invasive Brain Stimulation of the Cerebellum in Emotion.

Authors:  Jana Klaus; Dennis J L G Schutter
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 2.  New Horizons on Non-invasive Brain Stimulation of the Social and Affective Cerebellum.

Authors:  Z Cattaneo; C Ferrari; A Ciricugno; E Heleven; D J L G Schutter; M Manto; F Van Overwalle
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  How the Post-Fracture Rehabilitation Choice Affects Brain Function in Older People?

Authors:  Noriko Mitsuboshi; Minoru Kouzuki; Shigeru Mochida; Kanehito Morimoto; Katsuya Urakami
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2019-02-07

4.  Risk Variants in Three Alzheimer's Disease Genes Show Association with EEG Endophenotypes.

Authors:  Ana Macedo; Carlos Gómez; Miguel Ângelo Rebelo; Jesús Poza; Iva Gomes; Sandra Martins; Aarón Maturana-Candelas; Víctor Gutiérrez-de Pablo; Luis Durães; Patrícia Sousa; Manuel Figueruelo; María Rodríguez; Carmen Pita; Miguel Arenas; Luis Álvarez; Roberto Hornero; Alexandra M Lopes; Nádia Pinto
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  Cerebellar Coordination of Neuronal Communication in Cerebral Cortex.

Authors:  Samuel S McAfee; Yu Liu; Roy V Sillitoe; Detlef H Heck
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-11

6.  The correlations between kinematic profiles and cerebral hemodynamics suggest changes of motor coordination in single and bilateral finger movement.

Authors:  Guangquan Zhou; Yuzhao Chen; Xiaohan Wang; Hao Wei; Qinghua Huang; Le Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 7.  The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation in understanding attention-related networks in single subjects.

Authors:  B E Yeager; C C Dougher; R H Cook; J D Medaglia
Journal:  Curr Res Neurobiol       Date:  2021-07-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.