Literature DB >> 29766325

Anthropometric outcomes of a motivational interviewing school-based randomized trial involving adolescents with overweight.

Silvia Freira1, Marina Serra Lemos2, Helena Fonseca3, Geoffrey Williams4, Marta Ribeiro3, Fernanda Pena5, Maria do Céu Machado3.   

Abstract

Motivational interviewing (MI) is an effective method to promote weight loss that can be delivered by non-mental health providers. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether MI was superior to conventional counseling to improve the anthropometric outcomes of adolescents with obesity/overweight. It was a controlled cluster randomized trial with parallel design in a school setting. The study included two groups: Motivational Interviewing Group (MIG) and control group (Conventional Intervention Group, CIG). Students participated in three face-to-face 30-min interviews, 3 months apart. Outcomes were BMI z-score, abdominal circumference, percentages of fat mass and muscle mass, and blood pressure. Sessions were coded with the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) manual. Mixed repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to assess the group versus time interaction. Effect sizes were calculated for each ANOVA with eta-squared measures (η2). Eighty-three adolescents finished the protocol. While MIG participants showed a significant improvement in all anthropometric scores at 6 months, CIG participants showed an unfavorable change in those variables.
Conclusion: Our results provide additional evidence of the short-term usefulness of a school-based MI intervention on anthropometric outcomes of adolescents with obesity/overweight, demonstrating that pediatricians can play an important role in the prevention and management of pediatric obesity.Trial registration: The study is called IMAGINE and is registered in Clinicaltrials.gov with the number NCT02745795. What is Known: • Although MI has been recognized as an effective counseling style for behavioral change in weight loss, there are few reports about the anthropometric outcomes of interventions with adolescents being treated for obesity/overweight. • Our study showed significant positive changes in anthropometric variables (BMI z-score, abdominal circumference, percentage of fat mass, percentage of muscular mass, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) after only three face-to-face sessions over 6 months. What is New: • MI delivered by non-mental health providers in a school setting seems to have short-term usefulness in a program aiming the treatment of obese/overweight adolescents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure; Body composition; Body mass index; Motivational interviewing; Pediatric obesity; School health services

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29766325     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-018-3158-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  38 in total

Review 1.  Motivational interviewing in adolescent treatment.

Authors:  Sylvie Naar-King
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Promoting physical activity in children and youth: a leadership role for schools: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Physical Activity Committee) in collaboration with the Councils on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Cardiovascular Nursing.

Authors:  Russell R Pate; Michael G Davis; Thomas N Robinson; Elaine J Stone; Thomas L McKenzie; Judith C Young
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Motivational interviewing.

Authors:  Jennifer Hettema; Julie Steele; William R Miller
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 18.561

4.  Motivational interviewing as a way to promote physical activity in obese adolescents: a randomised-controlled trial using self-determination theory as an explanatory framework.

Authors:  Mathieu Gourlan; Philippe Sarrazin; David Trouilloud
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2013-06-11

5.  Adiposity in adolescents: change in actual BMI works better than change in BMI z score for longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Catherine S Berkey; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Challenge! Health promotion/obesity prevention mentorship model among urban, black adolescents.

Authors:  Maureen M Black; Erin R Hager; Katherine Le; Jean Anliker; S Sonia Arteaga; Carlo Diclemente; Joel Gittelsohn; Laurence Magder; Mia Papas; Soren Snitker; Margarita S Treuth; Yan Wang
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Office-based motivational interviewing to prevent childhood obesity: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Robert P Schwartz; Robin Hamre; William H Dietz; Richard C Wasserman; Eric J Slora; Esther F Myers; Susan Sullivan; Helaine Rockett; Kathleen A Thoma; Gema Dumitru; Kenneth A Resnicow
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2007-05

8.  Management of child and adolescent obesity: attitudes, barriers, skills, and training needs among health care professionals.

Authors:  Mary T Story; Dianne R Neumark-Stzainer; Nancy E Sherwood; Katrina Holt; Denise Sofka; Frederick L Trowbridge; Sarah E Barlow
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  What is the best measure of adiposity change in growing children: BMI, BMI %, BMI z-score or BMI centile?

Authors:  T J Cole; M S Faith; A Pietrobelli; M Heo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  School-based health center intervention improves body mass index in overweight and obese adolescents.

Authors:  Alberta S Kong; Andrew L Sussman; Carolina Yahne; Betty J Skipper; Mark R Burge; Sally M Davis
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2013-03-26
View more
  3 in total

1.  Demographics and anthropometrics impact benefits of health intervention: data from the Reduce Obesity and Diabetes Project.

Authors:  L Ostrowski; P W Speiser; S Accacha; L Altshuler; I Fennoy; B Lowell; R Rapaport; W Rosenfeld; S P Shelov; S Ten; M Rosenbaum
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2019-01-16

Review 2.  Does Motivational Interviewing Improve the Weight Management Process in Adolescents? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Parisa Amiri; Mohammad Masih Mansouri-Tehrani; Ahmad Khalili-Chelik; Mehrdad Karimi; Sara Jalali-Farahani; Atieh Amouzegar; Elham Kazemian
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2021-07-15

Review 3.  The Use of Effective Language and Communication in the Management of Obesity: the Challenge for Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Sameera Auckburally; Elena Davies; Jennifer Logue
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2021-05-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.