Brian Custer1,2, Nicolas Sheon3, Bob Siedle-Khan3, Lance Pollack3, Bryan Spencer4, Walter Bialkowski5, Pam D'Andrea6, Marian Sullivan7, Simone Glynn8, Alan Williams9. 1. Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, California. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California. 3. UCSF Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, San Francisco, California. 4. American Red Cross, New England Region, Dedham, Massachusetts. 5. BloodCenter of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 6. Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 7. RTI International, Rockville, Maryland. 8. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Bethesda, Maryland. 9. US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the United States, any man who discloses having had sex with another man (MSM) even once since 1977 is currently deferred from donating blood. A study was conducted to assess noncompliance with the policy at four geographically dispersed blood centers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Male donors 18+ years of age with e-mail addresses were randomly selected and invited to complete a confidential online survey between August and October 2013. No additional recruitment e-mails were sent. Survey content included demographics, sexual history, donation history, compliance with the policy, and opinions about current and modified policies. RESULTS: Response rate was 11.5% but varied by center (6.3% to 21.7%). Of 3183 completed surveys, 2.6% of respondents (95% confidence interval, 2.1%-3.2%) reported donation after male-male sex. Noncompliance was not statistically different among the centers (p = 0.1), but was related to age with 5.7, 4.6, 2.5, and 1.0% of donors 18 to 24, 25 to 34, 35 to 54, and 50+ years of age, respectively, reporting noncompliance (p < 0.001). Of all respondents, 6.8% reported at least six female and 0.3% reported at least six male sex partners in the past 5 years. Opinions about the current MSM policy were mixed with noncomplying donors more supportive of change than complying donors. Approximatey half of noncompliers indicated they would adhere to a 1-year deferral. CONCLUSION: Noncompliance with the MSM policy is evident and may be increasing compared to earlier data. Any change from the current policy will require close monitoring to determine whether it affects residual risk of HIV in the US blood supply.
BACKGROUND: In the United States, any man who discloses having had sex with another man (MSM) even once since 1977 is currently deferred from donating blood. A study was conducted to assess noncompliance with the policy at four geographically dispersed blood centers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Male donors 18+ years of age with e-mail addresses were randomly selected and invited to complete a confidential online survey between August and October 2013. No additional recruitment e-mails were sent. Survey content included demographics, sexual history, donation history, compliance with the policy, and opinions about current and modified policies. RESULTS: Response rate was 11.5% but varied by center (6.3% to 21.7%). Of 3183 completed surveys, 2.6% of respondents (95% confidence interval, 2.1%-3.2%) reported donation after male-male sex. Noncompliance was not statistically different among the centers (p = 0.1), but was related to age with 5.7, 4.6, 2.5, and 1.0% of donors 18 to 24, 25 to 34, 35 to 54, and 50+ years of age, respectively, reporting noncompliance (p < 0.001). Of all respondents, 6.8% reported at least six female and 0.3% reported at least six male sex partners in the past 5 years. Opinions about the current MSM policy were mixed with noncomplying donors more supportive of change than complying donors. Approximatey half of noncompliers indicated they would adhere to a 1-year deferral. CONCLUSION: Noncompliance with the MSM policy is evident and may be increasing compared to earlier data. Any change from the current policy will require close monitoring to determine whether it affects residual risk of HIV in the US blood supply.
Authors: C R Seed; T T Lucky; D Waller; H Wand; J F Lee; S Wroth; A McDonald; J Pink; D P Wilson; A J Keller Journal: Vox Sang Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 2.144
Authors: Tarana T A Lucky; Clive R Seed; Daniel Waller; June F Lee; Ann McDonald; Handan Wand; Stephen Wroth; Glen Shuttleworth; Anthony J Keller; Joanne Pink; David P Wilson Journal: Transfusion Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Brian Custer; Debra Kessler; Farnaz Vahidnia; German Leparc; David E Krysztof; Beth Shaz; Hany Kamel; Simone Glynn; Roger Y Dodd; Susan L Stramer Journal: Transfusion Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Ana M Sanchez; George B Schreiber; Catharie C Nass; Simone Glynn; Debra Kessler; Nora Hirschler; Joy Fridey; James Bethel; Edward Murphy; Michael P Busch Journal: Transfusion Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Anna Satcher Johnson; Linda Beer; Catlainn Sionean; Xiaohong Hu; Carolyn Furlow-Parmley; Binh Le; Jacek Skarbinski; H Irene Hall; Hazel D Dean Journal: MMWR Suppl Date: 2013-11-22
Authors: Patrick S Sullivan; Eli S Rosenberg; Travis H Sanchez; Colleen F Kelley; Nicole Luisi; Hannah L Cooper; Ralph J Diclemente; Gina M Wingood; Paula M Frew; Laura F Salazar; Carlos Del Rio; Mark J Mulligan; John L Peterson Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Anna E Wentz; Roland C Merchant; Melissa A Clark; Tao Liu; Joshua G Rosenberger; José A Bauermeister; Kenneth H Mayer Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Julia C Cutts; Brendan Quinn; Clive R Seed; George Kotsiou; Ruth Pearson; Nick Scott; David P Wilson; Mary Ellen Harrod; Lisa Maher; Sharon Caris; Alex J Thompson; Michael Farrell; Joanne Pink; Margaret E Hellard Journal: Transfus Med Hemother Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 3.747
Authors: Katherine L Imborek; Nicole L Nisly; Michael J Hesseltine; Jana Grienke; Todd A Zikmund; Nicholas R Dreyer; John L Blau; Maia Hightower; Robert M Humble; Matthew D Krasowski Journal: J Pathol Inform Date: 2017-10-03