| Literature DB >> 29765037 |
Ping He1, Guojun Wang2, Yanning Mo1, Qingxiong Yu1, Xiong Xiao1, Wenjuan Yang1, Weifeng Zhao1, Xuan Guo3, Qiong Chen4, Jianqiao He1, Mingli Liang1, Jian Zhu1, Yangbao Ding1, Zuzhang Wei1, Kang Ouyang1, Fang Liu1, Hui Jian1, Weijian Huang1, Adolfo García-Sastre5,6,7, Ying Chen8.
Abstract
Considered a "mixing vessel" for influenza viruses, pigs can give rise to new influenza virus reassortants that can threaten humans. During our surveillance of pigs in Guangxi, China from 2013 to 2015, we isolated 11 H1N1 and three H3N2 influenza A viruses of swine origin (IAVs-S). Out of the 14, we detected ten novel triple-reassortant viruses, which contained surface genes (hemagglutinin and neuraminidase) from Eurasian avian-like (EA) H1N1 or seasonal human-like H3N2, matrix (M) genes from H1N1/2009 pandemic or EA H1N1, nonstructural (NS) genes from classical swine, and the remaining genes from H1N1/2009 pandemic. Mouse studies indicate that these IAVs-S replicate efficiently without prior adaptation, with some isolates demonstrating lethality. Notably, the reassortant EA H1N1 viruses with EA-like M gene have been reported in human infections. Further investigations will help to assess the potential risk of these novel triple-reassortant viruses to humans.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29765037 PMCID: PMC5953969 DOI: 10.1038/s41426-018-0088-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Microbes Infect ISSN: 2222-1751 Impact factor: 7.163
Details of samples collected for SIVs testing in Guangxi
| City | Farm | Strains abbreviation | Sampling site | Time | Clinical signsa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanning | 1# | NN1994 | Farm(500 sows) | 2013.09 | Difficulty breathing; PRRSV positive |
| 2# | NNLX | Farm (900 sows) | 2014.10 | Fever, coughing, sneezing, nasal discharge | |
| 3# | NNXD | Farm(600 sows) | 2013.01 | Difficulty breathing; PRRSV and PCV positive | |
| NNXD2023 | Farm(600 sows) | 2013.09 | Coughing, sneezing, nasal discharge | ||
| 4# | JGB4 | Farm(1000 sows) | 2013.09 | Coughing and sneezing | |
| JG1 | Farm(1000 sows) | 2014.03 | Coughing and sneezing | ||
| Chongzuo | 5# | CZ7 | Farm(1000 sows) | 2014.10 | Fever, coughing, sneezing |
| Qingzhou | 6# | QZ5 | Farm(3000 sows) | 2014.08 | Fever, coughing, nasal discharge |
| Laibing | 7# | LB9 | Farm(800 sows) | 2014.10 | Fever, coughing, sneezing |
| Liuzhou | 8# | LZA3 | Farm(500 sows) | 2015.06 | Coughing and sneezing |
| Bobai | 9# | BB2 | Farm(1000 sows) | 2014.09 | Coughing and sneezing |
| Guigang | 10# | GG6 | Farm(800 sows) | 2013.05 | Coughing and sneezing |
| Dongxing | N/A | DX24 | Abattoirs | 2013.12 | N/A |
| Baise | N/A | BS30 | Abattoirs | 2014.11 | N/A |
N/A not available, PCV porcine circovirus
aPRRSV represents porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
Fig. 1Phylogenetic trees of the HA H1 (a), NA N1 (b), HA H3 (c), NA N2 (d), M (e), NS (f), PB2 (g), PB1 (h), PA (i), and NP (j) genes of the H1N1 and H3N2 influenza lineages. The unrooted trees were generated with the MEGA 7.0 program by using neighbor-joining analysis and reliability of the tree was assessed by bootstrap analysis with 1000 replications. Neighbor-joining bootstrap values ≥70 are shown at the major branches of the trees. The 12 trees were rooted to A/Brevig_Mission/1/18(H1N1). Viruses shown in black were downloaded from available databases. The isolates in our study were marked in different color, consistent with Fig. 2
Fig. 2Genotypes of H1N1 and H3N2 IAVs-S from Guangxi during 2013 to 2015.
Origin of each gene segment is colored for representing the different lineages
Genome similarity of H1N1 novel reassortant viruses compared with the human isolated A/Hunan/42443/2015(H1N1)
| Genotype | Name of virus | Gene segment (%)a | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HA | NA | PB2 | PB1 | PA | NP | M | NS | ||
| C | A/swine/Guangxi/NN1994/2013 | 98.7 | 97.8 | 98.0 | 99.1 | 98.4 | 98.9 | 95.0 | 97.9 |
| C | A/swine/Guangxi/CZ7/2014 | 98.0 | 98.0 | 97.9 | 99.0 | 97.8 | 98.7 | 92.8 | 97.7 |
| C | A/swine/Guangxi/LB9/2014 | 98.0 | 97.9 | 97.9 | 99.0 | 97.8 | 98.7 | 94.8 | 97.6 |
| C | A/swine/Guangxi/BS30/2014 | 98.0 | 98.0 | 97.9 | 98.9 | 97.8 | 98.6 | 94.8 | 97.7 |
| C | A/swine/Guangxi /NNLX/2014 | 98.6 | 97.7 | 98.0 | 98.6 | 98.5 | 98.6 | 94.8 | 97.9 |
| D | A/swine/Guangxi NNXD2023/2013 | 99.0 | 98.9 | 98.8 | 99.3 | 98.7 | 99.1 | 99.6 | 98.6 |
| D | A/swine/Guangxi /QZ5/2014 | 98.6 | 98.1 | 97.9 | 99.0 | 98.5 | 98.6 | 97.3 | 98.0 |
| D | A/swine/Guangxi /LZA3/2015 | 98.8 | 97.9 | 98.0 | 98.5 | 98.3 | 98.7 | 99.4 | 97.6 |
aThe genome similarity was generated based on the open reading frame (ORF) sequences
Amino acid substitutions in the novel H1N1 and H3N2 reassortant isolates compared with human isolates
| Lineage/subtype | Host | Virus | No. of glycosylation sites in HA | HAa | PB2 | M2 | NAc | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 138 | 190 | 225 | 226 | 228 | 271 | 590 | 591 | 627 | 701 | 31 | 274 | ||||
| EA H1N1 | Human | A/Hunan/42443/2015 | 7 | A | D | E | Q | G | A | G | R | E | D | N | Y |
| EA H1N1 | Swineb | Sw/GX/NNXD2023/2013 | 6 | * | * | * | * | * | * | S | * | * | * | * | * |
| EA H1N1 | Swineb | Sw/GX/QZ5/2014 | 6 | * | * | * | * | * | * | S | * | * | * | * | * |
| EA H1N1 | Swineb | Sw/GX/LZA3/2015 | 6 | * | * | * | * | * | * | N | * | * | * | * | * |
| EA H1N1 | Swineb | Sw/GX/NN1994/2013 | 7 | * | * | * | * | * | * | S | * | * | * | * | * |
| EA H1N1 | Swineb | Sw/GX/CZ7/2014 | 6 | * | * | * | * | * | * | S | * | * | * | * | * |
| EA H1N1 | Swineb | Sw/GX/LB9/2014 | 6 | * | * | * | * | * | * | S | * | * | * | * | * |
| EA H1N1 | Swineb | Sw/GX/BS30/2014 | 6 | * | * | * | * | * | * | S | * | * | * | * | * |
| EA H1N1 | Swineb | Sw/GX/NNLX/2014 | 6 | * | * | * | * | * | * | S | * | * | * | * | * |
| EA H1N1 | Swineb | Sw/GX/BB2/2013 | 6 | * | * | * | * | * | T | * | Q | * | N | * | * |
| EA H1N1 | Swineb | Sw/GX/GG6/2013 | 6 | * | * | * | * | * | T | * | Q | * | N | * | * |
| Early H1N1 | Avian | A/duck/Schleswig/21/1979 | 6 | * | E | G | * | * | T | * | Q | * | * | S | * |
| Pandemic H1N1 | Swineb | Sw/GX/DX24/2013 | 6 | * | * | D | * | * | * | S | * | * | * | * | * |
| Pandemic H1N1 | Human | A/California/04/2009 | 6 | * | * | D | * | * | * | S | * | * | * | * | * |
| HL H3N2 | Swineb | Sw/GX/NNXD/2013 | 6 | S | * | D | I | S | * | S | * | * | * | * | H |
| HL H3N2 | Swineb | Sw/GX/JGB4/2013 | 6 | S | * | D | I | S | * | S | * | * | * | * | H |
| HL H3N2 | Swineb | Sw/GX/JG1/2014 | 6 | S | * | D | I | S | * | S | * | * | * | * | H |
*indicated the identical amino acids with A/Hunan/42443/2015; Sw represents swine, GX represents Guangxi
aH3 numbering
bisolates in this study
cN2 numbering
Seroprevalence of antibodies against different swine influenza virus in pigs in Guangxi from 2009 to 2013
| Location | Serum samplesa | No. (%) of sera positive | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EA H1N1 | HL H3N2 | EA H1N1 + HL H3N2 | ||
| Nanning | 283 | 86 (30.4) | 166 (58.7) | 45(15.9) |
| Beihai | 60 | 24 (40.0) | 29 (48.3) | 8(13.3) |
| Fangchenggang | 40 | 3 (7.5) | 5 (12.5) | 1(2.5) |
| Liuzhou | 101 | 28 (27.7) | 17 (16.6) | 8(7.9) |
| Laibin | 130 | 31 (23.8) | 4 (3.1) | 2(1.5) |
| Guilin | 135 | 33 (24.4) | 33 (24.4) | 16(11.9) |
| Hezhou | 67 | 18 (26.9) | 17 (25.4) | 9(13.4) |
| Hechi | 80 | 9 (11.2) | 3 (1.3) | 1(1.3) |
| Baise | 60 | 6 (10.0) | 1 (1.7) | 0(0) |
| Yulin | 134 | 44 (32.8) | 51 (38.1) | 25(18.7) |
| Guigang | 80 | 14 (17.5) | 19 (23.8) | 11(13.8) |
| Total | 1170 | 296 (25.3) | 345 (29.5) | 126(10.8) |
aEurasian avian-like (EA) H1N1, A/swine/Guangxi/BB2/2013(H1N1); Human-like swine (HL) H3N2, A/swine/Guangxi/JGB4/2013 (H3N2)
Fig. 3Weight variation (a), survival rates (b), and replication (c) of novel reassortant IAVs-S in mice. Mice in each group were infected intranasally with 5 × 104 TCID50 of virus in a volume of 50 µL. The body weight and survival rates of mice were measured over 14 days. Virus titers of lung on 3 and 5 days post infection (d.p.i.) were shown as the mean titers of three mice