Literature DB >> 29763970

Technical Note: Experimental verification of magnetic field-induced beam deflection and Bragg peak displacement for MR-integrated proton therapy.

Sonja M Schellhammer1,2, Sebastian Gantz1,2, Armin Lühr1,2,3, Bradley M Oborn4,5, Michael Bussmann6, Aswin L Hoffmann1,2,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Given its sensitivity to anatomical variations, proton therapy is expected to benefit greatly from integration with magnetic resonance imaging for online anatomy monitoring during irradiation. Such an integration raises several challenges, as both systems mutually interact. The proton beam will experience quasi-continuous energy loss and energy-dependent electromagnetic deflection at the same time, giving rise to a deflected beam trajectory and an altered dose distribution with a displaced Bragg peak. So far, these effects have only been predicted using Monte Carlo and analytical models, but no clear consensus has been reached and experimental benchmark data are lacking. We measured proton beam trajectories and Bragg peak displacement in a homogeneous phantom placed inside a magnetic field and compared them to simulations.
METHODS: Planar dose distributions of proton pencil beams (80-180 MeV) traversing the field of a 0.95 T NdFeB permanent magnet while depositing energy in a PMMA slab phantom were measured using EBT3 radiochromic films and simulated using the Geant4 toolkit. Deflected beam trajectories and the Bragg peak displacement were extracted from the measured planar dose distributions and compared against the simulations.
RESULTS: The lateral beam deflection was clearly visible on the EBT3 films and ranged from 1 to 10 mm for 80 to 180 MeV, respectively. Simulated and measured beam trajectories and Bragg peak displacement agreed within 0.8 mm for all studied proton energies.
CONCLUSIONS: These results prove that the magnetic field-induced Bragg peak displacement is both measurable and accurately predictable in a homogeneous phantom at 0.95 T, and allows Monte Carlo simulations to be used as gold standard for proton beam trajectory prediction in similar frameworks for MR-integrated proton therapy.
© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR guidance; Monte Carlo simulation; magnetic field induced Bragg peak displacement; proton dosimetry; proton therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29763970     DOI: 10.1002/mp.12961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Carbon ion and proton beam irradiation of a normal human TK6 lymphoblastoid cell line within a magnetic field of 1.0 tesla.

Authors:  B Yudhistiara; K J Weber; P E Huber; A Ruehle; S Brons; P Haering; J Debus; H Hauswald
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 3.  MR-guided proton therapy: a review and a preview.

Authors:  Aswin Hoffmann; Bradley Oborn; Maryam Moteabbed; Susu Yan; Thomas Bortfeld; Antje Knopf; Herman Fuchs; Dietmar Georg; Joao Seco; Maria Francesca Spadea; Oliver Jäkel; Christopher Kurz; Katia Parodi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Converging Proton Minibeams with Magnetic Fields for Optimized Radiation Therapy: A Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Marco Cavallone; Yolanda Prezado; Ludovic De Marzi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.

Authors:  Fatima Padilla-Cabal; Jose Alejandro Fragoso; Andreas Franz Resch; Dietmar Georg; Hermann Fuchs
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Characterization of EBT3 radiochromic films for dosimetry of proton beams in the presence of magnetic fields.

Authors:  Fatima Padilla-Cabal; Peter Kuess; Dietmar Georg; Hugo Palmans; Lukas Fetty; Hermann Fuchs
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.