Literature DB >> 29763360

Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in Zirconia and Titanium Dental Implants.

Camilo Andres Villabona Lopez1,2, Marco Antônio Amorin Vasco3,4, Edwin Ruales5, Karin Apaza Bedoya5, Cesar Magalhaes Benfatti5, Osvaldo Luis Bezzon3,4, Tatiana Miranda Deliberador2,6.   

Abstract

Zirconia has been presented as an alternative biomaterial to titanium, commercially presented as a single-body implant and/or as an abutment, demonstrating clinically biocompatible favorable results in white and rose esthetics. However, the number of long-term in vivo studies and mechanical tests evaluating the response of stress distribution compared with titanium implants is still limited. The aim of the study was to compare the principal peak stresses in the peri-implant bone around titanium and zirconia implants using the finite element method. Four groups of 3-dimensional models were constructed for the tests: G1, external hexagon titanium implant with a zirconia abutment; G2, zirconia implant with a zirconia abutment; G3, single-body titanium implant; and G4, single-body zirconia implant. Axial and oblique loads of 100 N at 45° were simulated in the prosthetic crown. The bone results showed that the peak stresses decreased by 12% in zirconia implants with 2 parts for axial load and 30% for the oblique load. In single-body implants, the peak stresses decreased 12% in the axial load and 34% in the oblique load when a zirconia implant was used compared with a titanium implant. Although the stress values in megapascals are similar, it can be concluded that the zirconia implants decrease the stress peaks at the peri-implant bone area around the implant platform when compared with titanium implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29763360     DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  3 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.

Authors:  Fabricia Teixeira Barbosa; Luiz Carlos Silveira Zanatta; Edélcio de Souza Rendohl; Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Comparative finite element analysis of mandibular posterior single zirconia and titanium implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Sung-Min Choi; Hyunsuk Choi; Du-Hyeong Lee; Min-Ho Hong
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 3.  Bioengineering Tools Applied to Dentistry: Validation Methods for In Vitro and In Silico Analysis.

Authors:  Jefferson David Melo de Matos; Daher Antonio Queiroz; Leonardo Jiro Nomura Nakano; Valdir Cabral Andrade; Nathália de Carvalho Ramos Ribeiro; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Marco Antonio Bottino; Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer Lopes
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.