Da Tao1, Juan Yuan1, Xingda Qu1. 1. Institute of Human Factors and Ergonomics, College of Mechatronics and Control Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the effects of graphical formats and age on consumers' comprehension and perceptions of the use of self-monitoring test results. Methods: Participants (36 older and 36 young adults) were required to perform verbatim comprehension and value interpretation tasks with hypothetical self-monitoring test results. The test results were randomly presented by four reference range number lines: basic, color enhanced, color/text enhanced, and personalized information enhanced formats. We measured participants' task performance and eye movement data during task completion, and their perceptions and preference of the graphical formats. Results: The 4 graphical formats yielded comparable task performance, while text/color and personalized information enhanced formats were believed to be easier and more useful in information comprehension, and led to increased confidence in correct comprehension of test results, compared with other formats (all p's < .05). Perceived health risk increased as the formats applied more information cues (p = .008). There were age differences in task performance and visual attention (all p's < .01), while young and older adults had similar perceptions for the 4 formats. Personalized information enhanced format was preferred by both groups. Conclusions: Text/color and personalized information cues appear to be useful for comprehending test results. Future work can be directed to improve the design of graphical formats especially for older adults, and to assess the formats in clinical settings.
Objective: To examine the effects of graphical formats and age on consumers' comprehension and perceptions of the use of self-monitoring test results. Methods:Participants (36 older and 36 young adults) were required to perform verbatim comprehension and value interpretation tasks with hypothetical self-monitoring test results. The test results were randomly presented by four reference range number lines: basic, color enhanced, color/text enhanced, and personalized information enhanced formats. We measured participants' task performance and eye movement data during task completion, and their perceptions and preference of the graphical formats. Results: The 4 graphical formats yielded comparable task performance, while text/color and personalized information enhanced formats were believed to be easier and more useful in information comprehension, and led to increased confidence in correct comprehension of test results, compared with other formats (all p's < .05). Perceived health risk increased as the formats applied more information cues (p = .008). There were age differences in task performance and visual attention (all p's < .01), while young and older adults had similar perceptions for the 4 formats. Personalized information enhanced format was preferred by both groups. Conclusions: Text/color and personalized information cues appear to be useful for comprehending test results. Future work can be directed to improve the design of graphical formats especially for older adults, and to assess the formats in clinical settings.
Authors: Noel T Brewer; Melissa B Gilkey; Sarah E Lillie; Bradford W Hesse; Stacey L Sheridan Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Aaron M Scherer; Holly O Witteman; Jacob B Solomon; Nicole L Exe; Beth A Tarini; Angela Fagerlin Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Lisa V Grossman; Ruth M Masterson Creber; Natalie C Benda; Drew Wright; David K Vawdrey; Jessica S Ancker Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Meghan Reading Turchioe; Lisa V Grossman; Annie C Myers; Dawon Baik; Parag Goyal; Ruth M Masterson Creber Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Meghan Reading Turchioe; Lisa V Grossman; Dawon Baik; Christopher S Lee; Mathew S Maurer; Parag Goyal; Monika M Safford; Ruth M Masterson Creber Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Raheleh Salari; Sharareh R Niakan Kalhori; Marjan GhaziSaeedi; Marjan Jeddi; Mahin Nazari; Farhad Fatehi Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 5.428