Da Tao1, Tieyan Wang2, Tieshan Wang2, Shuang Liu3, Xingda Qu1. 1. Institute of Human Factors and Ergonomics, College of Mechatronics and Control Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. 2. School of Management, Xi'an Polytechnic University, Xi'an, China. 3. Marine Human Factors Engineering Lab, China Institute of Marine Technology and Economy, Beijing, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To reveal the effects of consumer-oriented health information technologies (CHITs) on patient outcomes in diabetes management over time through systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched 5 electronic databases (from database inception to July 2016) for studies that reported on randomized controlled trials examining the effects of CHITs on glycemic control and other patient outcomes in diabetes management. Data were analyzed using either meta-analysis or a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: Eighty randomized controlled trial studies, representing 87 individual trials, were identified and included for analysis. Overall, the meta-analysis showed that the use of CHITs resulted in significant improvement in glycemic control compared to usual care (standardized mean difference = -0.31%, 95% confidence interval -0.38 to -0.23, P < .001) in patients with diabetes. Specifically, improvement in glycemic control was significant at intervention durations of 3, 6, 8, 9, 12, 15, 30, and 60 months, while no significant differences were found at other time points reported. The narrative synthesis provided mixed effects of CHITs on other clinical, psychosocial, behavioral, and knowledge outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CHITs appears to be more effective than usual care in improving glycemic control for patients with diabetes. However, their effectiveness did not remain consistent over time and in other patient outcomes. Further efforts are required to examine long-term effects of CHITs and to explore factors that can moderate the effects over time.
OBJECTIVE: To reveal the effects of consumer-oriented health information technologies (CHITs) on patient outcomes in diabetes management over time through systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched 5 electronic databases (from database inception to July 2016) for studies that reported on randomized controlled trials examining the effects of CHITs on glycemic control and other patient outcomes in diabetes management. Data were analyzed using either meta-analysis or a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: Eighty randomized controlled trial studies, representing 87 individual trials, were identified and included for analysis. Overall, the meta-analysis showed that the use of CHITs resulted in significant improvement in glycemic control compared to usual care (standardized mean difference = -0.31%, 95% confidence interval -0.38 to -0.23, P < .001) in patients with diabetes. Specifically, improvement in glycemic control was significant at intervention durations of 3, 6, 8, 9, 12, 15, 30, and 60 months, while no significant differences were found at other time points reported. The narrative synthesis provided mixed effects of CHITs on other clinical, psychosocial, behavioral, and knowledge outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CHITs appears to be more effective than usual care in improving glycemic control for patients with diabetes. However, their effectiveness did not remain consistent over time and in other patient outcomes. Further efforts are required to examine long-term effects of CHITs and to explore factors that can moderate the effects over time.
Authors: Charlene C Quinn; Michelle D Shardell; Michael L Terrin; Erik A Barr; Shoshana H Ballew; Ann L Gruber-Baldini Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Maria C E Rossi; Antonio Nicolucci; Paolo Di Bartolo; Daniela Bruttomesso; Angela Girelli; Francisco J Ampudia; David Kerr; Antonio Ceriello; Carmen De La Questa Mayor; Fabio Pellegrini; David Horwitz; Giacomo Vespasiani Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Deborah A Greenwood; Michelle L Litchman; Diana Isaacs; Julia E Blanchette; Jane K Dickinson; Allyson Hughes; Vanessa D Colicchio; Jiancheng Ye; Kirsten Yehl; Andrew Todd; Malinda M Peeples Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2021-08-11
Authors: Joseph Featherall; Brittany Lapin; Alexander Chaitoff; Sonia A Havele; Nicolas Thompson; Irene Katzan Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Anish Menon; Farhad Fatehi; Dominique Bird; Darsy Darssan; Mohan Karunanithi; Anthony Russell; Leonard Gray Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Yilin Yoshida; Suzanne A Boren; Jesus Soares; Mihail Popescu; Stephen D Nielson; Eduardo J Simoes Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 4.810