Literature DB >> 2976115

An examination of the association between vertebral deformities, physical disabilities and psychosocial problems.

B Ettinger1, J E Block, R Smith, S R Cummings, S T Harris, H K Genant.   

Abstract

In order to measure the clinical consequences of spinal osteoporosis, we correlated a number of physical and psychosocial dysfunctions with the degree of vertebral deformity in 204 women aged 55-75 yr. We employed 5 standardized questionnaire instruments: the physical dimension of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), an analog back pain scale, a 24-question instrument eliciting back-related disabilities, and assessments of self-esteem and mastery. Using these results as the dependent variables, we performed 5 separate stepwise regression analyses; independent variables were vertebral deformity score and 11 possible confounders. Using Pearson correlation coefficients, we found a high degree of correlation between each of the 5 primary outcome variables. Vertebral deformity score played a small but statistically significant role in the 3 models whose dependent variable was related to physical dysfunction, but it accounted for only 4-10% of the variance of these models. Mastery and self-esteem were related to overall poor health and attendant physical disabilities but not to vertebral deformity score. In this selected cohort of women, the occurrence of mild to moderate vertebral deformities caused little loss of physical function or function of psychosocial problems because of vertebral deformity. Although we were able to demonstrate a statistically significant handicap related to the total vertebral deformity score, several other clinical variables appeared to have a greater impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2976115     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5122(88)90064-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  23 in total

Review 1.  Health related quality of life outcome instruments.

Authors:  Gunnar Németh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT.

Authors:  J S Bauer; D Müller; A Ambekar; M Dobritz; M Matsuura; F Eckstein; E J Rummeny; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bisphosphonates and vertebral fracture: an epidemiological perspective.

Authors:  C Cooper; I Fogelman; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Impact of mild and moderate/severe vertebral fractures on physical activity: a prospective study of older women in the UK.

Authors:  U A Al-Sari; J H Tobias; E M Clark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  [Burden of illness in vertebral deformities. EVOS group in Germany].

Authors:  C Matthis; H Raspe
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-03-15

6.  Design of the Fracture Intervention Trial.

Authors:  D M Black; T F Reiss; M C Nevitt; J Cauley; D Karpf; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Vertebral deformity, bone mineral density, back pain and height loss in unscreened women over 50 years.

Authors:  P H Nicholson; M J Haddaway; M W Davie; S F Evans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Spinal extension exercises prevent natural progression of kyphosis.

Authors:  J M Ball; P Cagle; B E Johnson; C Lucasey; B P Lukert
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformities.

Authors:  L J Melton; A W Lane; C Cooper; R Eastell; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.