Literature DB >> 29761089

Association of Haemodynamic Indices of Central and Peripheral Pressure with Subclinical Target Organ Damage.

Junli Zuo1,2, Shaoli Chu1, Isabella Tan3, Mark Butlin3, Jiehui Zhao4, Alberto Avolio3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central aortic pressure has often been shown to be more closely associated with markers of vascular function and incidence of cardiovascular events compared to peripheral pressure. However, the potential clinical use of central aortic or peripheral haemodynamic indices as markers of target organ damage (TOD) has not been fully established.
METHODS: We evaluated associations of TOD with central aortic and peripheral haemodynamic indices (central aortic [cPP] and peripheral pulse pressure [pPP], central aortic augmentation index, and central and peripheral waveform factor) in 770 hospital inpatients (age 60 ± 10 years, 473 males) with primary hypertension. TOD was quantified in terms of arterial stiffness as measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR). Subclinical TOD was defined as carotid IMT >0.9 mm, urine ACR >3.5 mg/mmol in females and >2.5 mg/mmol in males and/or cfPWV >12 m/s.
RESULTS: Both cPP and pPP showed significant correlation with cfPWV (r = 0.41 vs. 0.40; p < 0.01), ACR (r = 0.24 vs. 0.27; p < 0.01) and carotid IMT (r = 0.14 vs. 0.15; p < 0.01). Each SD increase in pPP and cPP was associated with increased risk of cfPWV >12 m/s (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7 and 2.9 for pPP and cPP, respectively), ACR >2.5 mg/mmol (OR = 1.2 and 1.4, respectively), and carotid IMT >0.9 mm (OR = 1.46 and 1.53, respectively). Compared to pPP, cPP had higher predictive power for TOD for age ≥60 years (OR = 3.07, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although both pPP and cPP show an association with TOD in a hypertensive population, cPP provides additional information beyond pPP associated with TOD in a hypertensive cohort. Central aortic haemodynamic indices as potential biomarkers of subclinical TOD need to be validated by further prospective studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Albumin-to-creatinine ratio; Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; Intima-media thickness; Pulse wave analysis; Target organ damage

Year:  2017        PMID: 29761089      PMCID: PMC5939803          DOI: 10.1159/000484441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pulse (Basel)        ISSN: 2235-8668


  35 in total

1.  2013 ESH/ESC Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redon; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stephane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Noninvasive determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity depends critically on assessment of travel distance: a comparison with invasive measurement.

Authors:  Thomas Weber; Marcus Ammer; Martin Rammer; Audrey Adji; Michael F O'Rourke; Siegfried Wassertheurer; Stefan Rosenkranz; Bernd Eber
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Outcome associations of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity vary with different measurement methods.

Authors:  Nicolas Girerd; Liliana Legedz; Vinciane Paget; Muriel Rabilloud; Hugues Milon; Giampiero Bricca; Pierre Lantelme
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Most advisable strategy in search of asymptomatic target organ damage in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  J Abellán-Huerta; L Prieto-Valiente; L Consuegra-Sánchez; S Montoro-García; A B Salguero-Merino; R Morales-López; J Abellán-Alemán; F Soria-Arcos
Journal:  Hipertens Riesgo Vasc       Date:  2017-05-15

5.  Which markers of subclinical organ damage to measure in individuals with high normal blood pressure?

Authors:  Thomas Sehestedt; Jørgen Jeppesen; Tine W Hansen; Susanne Rasmussen; Kristian Wachtell; Hans Ibsen; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Michael H Olsen
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Intraaortic pulse pressure amplification in subjects at high coronary risk.

Authors:  Mohamed Temmar; Piotr Jankowski; Marcel Peltier; Vincent Mouquet; Dorota Debicka-Dabrowska; Farah Hamida; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Michel E Safar
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Association between urinary albumin excretion and both central and peripheral blood pressure in subjects with insulin resistance.

Authors:  Anna Oliveras; Luis García-Ortiz; Julián Segura; José R Banegas; Nieves Martell-Claros; Luis Vigil; Carmen Suarez; Manuel Á Gomez-Marcos; María Abad-Cardiel; Susana Vazquez; Juan J de la Cruz; Stanley S Franklin; Luis M Ruilope; Alejandro de la Sierra
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 8.  Mechanical factors in arterial aging: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Michael F O'Rourke; Junichiro Hashimoto
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance.

Authors:  Carmel M McEniery; John R Cockcroft; Mary J Roman; Stanley S Franklin; Ian B Wilkinson
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 10.  Validation of non-invasive central blood pressure devices: ARTERY Society task force consensus statement on protocol standardization.

Authors:  James E Sharman; Alberto P Avolio; Johannes Baulmann; Athanase Benetos; Jacques Blacher; C Leigh Blizzard; Pierre Boutouyrie; Chen-Huan Chen; Phil Chowienczyk; John R Cockcroft; J Kennedy Cruickshank; Isabel Ferreira; Lorenzo Ghiadoni; Alun Hughes; Piotr Jankowski; Stephane Laurent; Barry J McDonnell; Carmel McEniery; Sandrine C Millasseau; Theodoros G Papaioannou; Gianfranco Parati; Jeong Bae Park; Athanase D Protogerou; Mary J Roman; Giuseppe Schillaci; Patrick Segers; George S Stergiou; Hirofumi Tomiyama; Raymond R Townsend; Luc M Van Bortel; Jiguang Wang; Siegfried Wassertheurer; Thomas Weber; Ian B Wilkinson; Charalambos Vlachopoulos
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Influence of Blood Pressure and Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity on Target Organ Damage in Hypertension.

Authors:  Huijuan Chao; Yan He; Qian Wang; Yaya Bai; Alberto Avolio; Xueqin Deng; Junli Zuo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-05

2.  Comparison of Risk of Target Organ Damage in Different Phenotypes of Arterial Stiffness and Central Aortic Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Yaya Bai; Qian Wang; Di Cheng; Yueliang Hu; Huijuan Chao; Alberto Avolio; Biwen Tang; Junli Zuo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.