Literature DB >> 29760608

Calf Circumference as a Simple Screening Marker for Diagnosing Sarcopenia in Older Korean Adults: the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS).

Sunyoung Kim1, Miji Kim2, Yunhwan Lee3, ByungSung Kim4, Tai Young Yoon5, Chang Won Won6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore the optimal cut-off point of calf circumference (CC) as a simple proxy marker of appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) and sarcopenia in the Korean elderly and to test the criterion-related validity of CC by analyzing its relationships with the physical function.
METHODS: The participants were 657 adults aged 70 to 84 years who had completed both dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and physical function test in the first baseline year of the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study.
RESULTS: ASM and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) were correlated positively with CC (male, ASM, r = 0.55 and SMI, r = 0.54; female, ASM, r = 0.55 and SMI, r = 0.42; all P < 0.001). Testing the validity of CC as a proxy marker for low muscle mass, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 for males and 0.72 for females were found and their optimal cut-off values of CC were 35 cm for males and 33 cm for females. In addition, CC-based low muscle groups were correlated with physical functions even after adjusting for age and body mass index. Also, the cut-off value of CC for sarcopenia was 32 cm (AUC; male, 0.82 and female, 0.72).
CONCLUSION: The optimal cut-off values of CC for low MM are 35 cm for males and 33 cm for females. Lower CC based on these cut-off values is related with poor physical function. CC may be also a good indicator of sarcopenia in Korean elderly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aged; Anthropometry; Korea; Muscle Mass; Sarcopenia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29760608      PMCID: PMC5944215          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


INTRODUCTION

Sarcopenia, resulting from reduced skeletal muscle mass, is associated with aging. The concept of sarcopenia was first introduced in 1989 by Irwin Rosenberg.1 Sarcopenia is directly responsible for reduced strength, which elevates the risk of negative outcomes such as decreased physical function, fall, disability, and death.2345 Sarcopenia was recently officially classified as a disease and assigned an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10CM) code in the USA.6 In 1998, following the recommendation by Baumgartner et al.,2 sarcopenia was defined as a lean mass index (ASM/Ht2) measured with DXA that fell 2SD below the mean for young and healthy adults. Subsequently, several regions (Europe, USA, and Asia) and organizations incorporated decreased physical performance in the diagnostic criteria.789 Along with reduced muscle strength and performance, low muscle mass is an essential element for diagnosing sarcopenia. Although diagnostic imaging methods such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) have been recommended to assess muscle mass, the risk of radiation exposure, need for skilled technicians, and time and budgetary restrictions prohibit their wider adoption across communities or large-scale research projects.101112 Based on the need for a simpler method of assessing muscle mass than diagnostic imaging, ongoing studies demonstrating associations between markers and muscle mass have been conducted in community-based, primary care, and large-scale epidemiological contexts. Calf circumference (CC) measurements, which are simple to obtain and noninvasive, have been used as a basic tool for assessing nutritional status. A number of studies have evaluated its adequacy as a proxy for appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM).131415 However, anthropometric indices including CC tend to vary by age, gender, ethnicity, and environment, making it difficult to determine standard values. Therefore, the predictive accuracy of CC has been debated.1116 The purpose of this study was to explore optimal cut-off values of CC for using as a proxy of ASM in Korean elderly, and to verify the criterion-related validity of CC by analyzing its relationships with sarcopenia and physical function using the first-year baseline data from the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS) (an ongoing nationwide cohort study since 2016).

METHODS

Study sample and protocol

The study subjects consisted of older Koreans aged 70 to 84 years who participated in the KFACS, a nationwide cohort study initiated in 2016 to identify and prevent risk factors for frailty among community dwelling elders. KFACS is a multi-center longitudinal study, with 3,000 samples recruited from 10 participating centers across Korean urban, agricultural, and urban countryside communities between 2016 and 2017. In each community, residents who did not plan to relocate outside of the current community within the next 2 years were eligible. Among these, community dwelling elders between 70 and 84 years stratified by age and gender were included for the study.17 Of the total 1,559 individuals recruited in the first year, 657 individuals whose muscle mass was evaluated using Lunar DXA and who completed the physical performance assessment were included in the present analysis.

Anthropometric measurement methods

Anthropometries were measured using an inelastic tape by investigators trained in standardized measurement methods. To measure the upper arm circumference (UAC), the subject raised the arm at shoulder level with the elbow bent at 90° angle. In this position, the subject flexes the bicep, which can be measured at its greatest girth. To measure CC, the subject stood upright with feet apart shoulder width and body weight evenly distributed between both legs. In this position, CC can be measured at the calf's greatest girth using an inelastic tape measure. To measure waist circumference (WC), the inspector measured participants' the midpoint of lower end of the last rib and the upper ridge of the iliac crest. Body composition was measured using DXA (GE Medical Systems Lunar, Madison, WI, USA). DXA was used to obtain ASM and the fat masses of the four limbs, and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was calculated as ASM divided by height squared.

Physical performance and strength measurement

A digital hand grip gauge (Takei TKK 5401, Takei Scientific Instruments, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure hand grip strength (HGS). The grip strength of each hand was measured once, one at a time. Following a 3-minute wait, a second round of measurement was performed. The highest value for each hand was included in the analysis. To assess balance, gait speed (GS), and sit-to-stand (short physical performance battery, SPPB), and 3-meter time up and go (TUG), existing test guidelines for each procedure were followed.18 Each item of the SPPB is scored based on a 0 to 4-point scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 12 points. For GS assessment, the subject walked a total of 7 m at a usual pace, and the time taken to a total of 4 m in the middle (from the 1.5 m point to 5.5 m point) was measured. The test was repeated twice, and the mean of the two trials was used for analysis. For the sit-to-stand test, the subject was timed while performing five cycles of “stand up from and sit down on a chair” as quickly as possible. For the 3-m TUG test, the participant stands up from a chair without armrests and walks 3 m at usual pace, turns at a marker, returns to the chair, and sit down. The TUG time was defined as the time from the start to sit down. To obtain the physical functioning (PF) scale, each subject was personally examined based on a questionnaire consisting of five items: walk the perimeter of a playground (approximately 400 m), climb a flight of stairs (10 steps), bend over forward or squat or kneel, extend the arm to touch an object overhead, and lift an object as heavy as 1.8 L of rice. Each item was scored on a 0 to 3-point scale, and the total score was converted to a 100-point scale. The closer the total score approached 100 points, the greater the subject's physical function.19

Definitions of sarcopenia

According to the criteria established by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS), sarcopenia was defined as low muscle function (HGS of < 26 kg for males and < 18 kg for females and/or GS of < 0.8 m/s for both sex) plus low muscle mass (SMI of < 7.0 kg/m2 for males and for females < 5.4 kg/m2). Additionally, Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL) was determined.9

Statistical methods

The study subjects' characteristics are presented by sex, as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance for continuous variables was verified using a t-test. A Pearson correlation analysis was performed to verify the relationships between anthropometric variables, ASM, and SMI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to explore the cut-off values of CC for males and females and to verify the predictive validity of low SMI measured using DXA.20 We performed analysis of covariance to verify the relationships between reduced muscle mass and related changes in physical function. SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis, and statistical significance was determined at a P value of < 0.05.

Ethics statement

Our research plan was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Kyung Hee University, and written consent was obtained from each subject prior to commencement of the study (approved No. KMC IRB 2017-09-022).

RESULTS

General characteristics of the participants

The mean age of the 657 participants was 76.2 years (76.5 for males and 75.8 for females), and the mean body weight was 60.3 kg (65.2 kg for males and 57.1 kg for females.) The mean CC of the subjects was 33.2 cm, with males having a higher mean CC than females (34.1 cm for males 32.5 cm for females.) The mean ASM measured using DXA was 19.6 kg for males and 13.7 kg for females, HGS, 32.1 kg for males and 20.5 kg for females, GS 1.3 m/s for males and 1.1 m/s for females indicating a sex difference (Table 1). Of the anthropometric indices, ASM and SMI were negatively correlated with age and positively correlated with bodyweight, body mass index (BMI), WC, UAC, and CC (males, ASM r = 0.55, SMI, r = 0.54; females, ASM, r = 0.55, SMI, r = 0.42, all P < 0.001) (Table 2).
Table 1

General characteristics of study population

VariablesTotal (n = 657)Male (n = 312)Female (n = 345)P value
Age, yr76.2 ± 476.5 ± 3.875.8 ± 4.10.027
Height, cm157.6 ± 8.7164.9 ± 5.7151.1 ± 5< 0.001
Weight, kg60.3 ± 9.264.7 ± 8.756.4 ± 7.8< 0.001
BMI, kg/m224.3 ± 323.8 ± 2.924.7 ± 3< 0.001
ASM, kg16.5 ± 3.619.6 ± 2.413.7 ± 1.6< 0.001
ASM/Ht2, kg/m26.6 ± 0.97.2 ± 0.86 ± 0.6< 0.001
ASM/BMI0.7 ± 0.20.8 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.1< 0.001
Leg LM, kg12.2 ± 2.614.5 ± 1.810.2 ± 1.3< 0.001
Leg FM, kg5 ± 1.84.2 ± 1.45.7 ± 1.8< 0.001
Arm LM, kg4.3 ± 1.15.1 ± 0.83.5 ± 0.5< 0.001
Arm FM, kg1.9 ± 0.81.5 ± 0.62.3 ± 0.8< 0.001
WC, cm87.5 ± 8.488.2 ± 8.586.9 ± 8.20.045
UAC, cm27.9 ± 328.3 ± 2.827.5 ± 3.20.002
CC, cm33.2 ± 334.2 ± 332.4 ± 2.8< 0.001
HGS, kg26 ± 7.632.1 ± 5.720.5 ± 4.1< 0.001
GS, m/s1.2 ± 0.31.3 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.3< 0.001
SPPB10.5 ± 1.610.8 ± 1.410.2 ± 1.8< 0.001
TUG, sec10.7 ± 2.810.2 ± 2.311.2 ± 3.1< 0.001
IADL11.9 ± 3.213.1 ± 3.610.8 ± 2.2< 0.001
PF scale79.9 ± 22.990.5 ± 15.170.2 ± 24.4< 0.001

Variables presented as means or values with standard deviation. P value of t-test for continuous variables.

BMI = body mass index, ASM = appendicular skeletal muscle mass, LM = lean mass, FM = fat mass, WC = waist circumference, UAC = upper arm circumference, CC = calf circumference, HGS = hand grip strength, GS = gait speed, SPPB = short physical performance battery, TUG = time up and go, IADL = instrumental activities of daily living, PF = physical functioning.

Table 2

Correlations between anthropometric variables, ASM, and SMI (ASM/Ht2)

VariablesTotalMaleFemale
ASMASM/Ht2ASMASM/Ht2ASMASM/Ht2
raPrPrPrPrPrP
Age−0.070.095−0.050.217−0.25< 0.001−0.180.002−0.24< 0.001−0.100.060
Height0.82< 0.0010.49< 0.0010.50< 0.001−0.060.2650.49< 0.001−0.060.262
Weight0.73< 0.0010.65< 0.0010.78< 0.0010.64< 0.0010.63< 0.0010.40< 0.001
BMI0.17< 0.0010.37< 0.0010.58< 0.0010.73< 0.0010.46< 0.0010.50< 0.001
WC0.32< 0.0010.36< 0.0010.51< 0.0010.51< 0.0010.38< 0.0010.29< 0.001
UAC0.37< 0.0010.38< 0.0010.56< 0.0010.52< 0.0010.41< 0.0010.31< 0.001
CC0.54< 0.0010.54< 0.0010.55< 0.0010.54< 0.0010.55< 0.0010.42< 0.001

ASM = appendicular skeletal muscle mass, SMI = skeletal muscle mass index, BMI = body mass index, WC = waist circumference, UAC = upper arm circumference, CC = calf circumference.

ar = Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Variables presented as means or values with standard deviation. P value of t-test for continuous variables. BMI = body mass index, ASM = appendicular skeletal muscle mass, LM = lean mass, FM = fat mass, WC = waist circumference, UAC = upper arm circumference, CC = calf circumference, HGS = hand grip strength, GS = gait speed, SPPB = short physical performance battery, TUG = time up and go, IADL = instrumental activities of daily living, PF = physical functioning. ASM = appendicular skeletal muscle mass, SMI = skeletal muscle mass index, BMI = body mass index, WC = waist circumference, UAC = upper arm circumference, CC = calf circumference. ar = Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Cut-off value of CC for low muscle mass and sarcopenia

ROC analysis was performed to confirm the criterion-related validity of CC for low muscle mass according to the AWGS guideline, and the result identified an area under the curve of 0.81 for males and 0.72 for females (Fig. 1).9 From ROC analysis, the optimal cut off value, statistically defined as the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity, was 35 cm for males (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 59%) and 33 cm for females (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 50%)
Fig. 1

The receiver operating characteristic curve of CC for low muscle mass and sarcopenia based on the AWGS definition. (A) Male, (B) Female.

CC = calf circumference, AWGS = Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia, SMI = skeletal muscle mass index, AUC = area under the curve, CI = confidence interval.

The receiver operating characteristic curve of CC for low muscle mass and sarcopenia based on the AWGS definition. (A) Male, (B) Female.

CC = calf circumference, AWGS = Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia, SMI = skeletal muscle mass index, AUC = area under the curve, CI = confidence interval. ROC analysis was performed to confirm the validity of CC against sarcopenia according to the AWGS, and the result identified an area under the curve of 0.824 for males and 0.722 for females (Fig. 1). The optimal CC value from the ROC analysis, statistically defined as the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity, was 32 cm (males, sensitivity 75%, specificity 83%; females, sensitivity 85%, specificity 57%) (Tables 3 and 4).
Table 3

Sensitivity and specificity of CC measures for low SMI according to AWGS criteria

CCFor low SMI according to AWGS criteria
MaleFemale
SensitivitySpecificityYouden indexSensitivitySpecificityYouden index
31---52%78%0.30
32---73%60%0.33
3349%87%0.3683%50%0.34
3467%77%0.4593%36%0.29
3592%59%0.51---
3697%40%0.37---

Low SMI based on of AWGS guideline (< 7.0 kg/m2 in [m], < 5.4 kg/m2 in [f]).

CC = calf circumference, SMI = skeletal muscle mass index, AWGS = Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia.

Table 4

Sensitivity and specificity of CC measures for sarcopenia according to AWGS criteria

CCFor sarcopenia according to AWGS criteria
MaleFemale
SensitivitySpecificityYouden indexSensitivitySpecificityYouden index
31---54%75%0.29
3275%83%0.5885%57%0.42
3379%78%0.5788%47%0.36
3486%64%0.5092%33%0.26
3593%42%0.35---

Sarcopenia was defined as low muscle function (HGS of < 26 kg for males and < 18 kg for females and/or GS of < 0.8 m/s for both sex) plus low muscle mass (SMI of < 7.0 kg/m2 for males and for females < 5.4 kg/m2).

CC = calf circumference, AWGS = Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia, HGS = hand grip strength, GS = gait speed, SMI = skeletal muscle mass index.

Low SMI based on of AWGS guideline (< 7.0 kg/m2 in [m], < 5.4 kg/m2 in [f]). CC = calf circumference, SMI = skeletal muscle mass index, AWGS = Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was defined as low muscle function (HGS of < 26 kg for males and < 18 kg for females and/or GS of < 0.8 m/s for both sex) plus low muscle mass (SMI of < 7.0 kg/m2 for males and for females < 5.4 kg/m2). CC = calf circumference, AWGS = Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia, HGS = hand grip strength, GS = gait speed, SMI = skeletal muscle mass index.

CC and physical function

In the sarcopenia group based on DXA, both males and females were significantly correlated with reduced HGS, GS, SPPB, TUG, and PF. In the sarcopenia group based on CC males, even after adjusting age and BMI, were significantly correlated with muscle function (HGS, GS), physical performance (SPPB, TUG), whereas females in sarcopenia group based on CC were significantly correlated with reduced muscle function (only HGS) and PF (Table 5).
Table 5

Unadjusted and adjusted means (±standard errors) of muscle function, performance, and frailty index according to sarcopenia using AWGS criteria and CC

SexVariablesSarcopenia defined using AWGSSarcopenia defined using CCSarcopenia defined using CC Age, BMI (after adjusted)
No sarcopeniaSarcopeniaPCC > 32CC ≤ 32PCC > 32CC ≤ 32P
MaleTotal, No.287332437724377
HGS32.8 ± 5.324.6 ± 3.5< 0.00132.8 ± 5.429.3 ± 5.6< 0.00132.6 ± 0.329.9 ± 0.70.001
GS1.3 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.3< 0.0011.3 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.3< 0.0011.3 ± 01.1 ± 0< 0.001
SPPB10.9 ± 1.39.9 ± 2.1< 0.00110.9 ± 1.310.3 ± 1.70.00110.9 ± 0.110.4 ± 0.20.008
TUG10.1 ± 2.211.7 ± 2.5< 0.00110.0 ± 2.310.8 ± 2.20.01010 ± 0.110.8 ± 0.30.024
IADL13.0 ± 3.513.8 ± 4.00.24013.1 ± 3.513.1 ± 3.80.95713 ± 0.213.3 ± 0.50.659
PF91.5 ± 14.082.6 ± 19.00.00190.7 ± 14.390.1 ± 16.40.74590.9 ± 189.8 ± 1.90.624
FemaleTotal, No.29427169152169152
HGS20.8 ± 3.915.5 ± 3.1< 0.00121.0 ± 4.019.6 ± 4.10.00121.1 ± 0.319.6 ± 0.40.007
GS1.1 ± 0.30.9 ± 0.3< 0.0011.1 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.30.0191.1 ± 01.1 ± 00.166
SPPB10.3 ± 1.79.1 ± 2.10.00210.3 ± 1.710.0 ± 1.90.07410.3 ± 0.110.1 ± 0.20.396
TUG11.0 ± 3.013.3 ± 3.7< 0.00110.9 ± 3.011.5 ± 3.30.07311 ± 0.311.4 ± 0.30.384
IADL10.7 ± 2.011.1 ± 2.40.38910.6 ± 1.810.9 ± 2.30.20410.7 ± 0.210.8 ± 0.20.823
PF71.0 ± 24.153.0 ± 27.6< 0.00173.9 ± 22.664.7 ± 26.40.00174.5 ± 264 ± 2.10.001

Unadjusted and adjusted by age and BMI means ± standard error of variables between sarcopenia and normal group. Analysis of covariance general lineal model with multivariate analysis. Sarcopenia was defined as low muscle function (HGS of < 26 kg for males and < 18 kg for females and/or GS of < 0.8 m/s for both sex) plus low muscle mass (SMI of < 7.0 kg/m2 for males and for females < 5.4 kg/m2).

AWGS = Asian working Group for Sarcopenia, CC = calf circumference, SMI = skeletal muscle mass index, HGS = hand grip strength, GS = gait speed, SPPB = short physical performance battery, TUG = time up and go, IADL = instrumental activities of daily living, PF = physical functioning.

Unadjusted and adjusted by age and BMI means ± standard error of variables between sarcopenia and normal group. Analysis of covariance general lineal model with multivariate analysis. Sarcopenia was defined as low muscle function (HGS of < 26 kg for males and < 18 kg for females and/or GS of < 0.8 m/s for both sex) plus low muscle mass (SMI of < 7.0 kg/m2 for males and for females < 5.4 kg/m2). AWGS = Asian working Group for Sarcopenia, CC = calf circumference, SMI = skeletal muscle mass index, HGS = hand grip strength, GS = gait speed, SPPB = short physical performance battery, TUG = time up and go, IADL = instrumental activities of daily living, PF = physical functioning.

DISCUSSION

Measuring CC is a simple and noninvasive assessment method that is easily accessible in communities and primary care settings. World Health Organization (WHO) has suggested the use of CC as a marker of muscle mass in elderly people, and research conducted in 55 European countries has shown that the use of CC as a muscle mass index was more frequent than that of diagnostic imaging, such as DXA or CT in primary care setting.2122 However, the cut-off values of CC that are useful for indicating reduced muscle mass can vary by ethnicity and geographical region. A Japanese study involving community members aged 40–89 years and a Brazilian study of subjects aged 60–69 years both suggested cut-off values of 34 cm for males and 33 cm for females, whereas a French study involving female community members aged ≥ 70 years suggested 31 cm as a cut-off value for diagnosing sarcopenia.141523 Results of the present study suggest that among elderly community members in Korea, CC and ASM were positively correlated (males, r = 0.55, P < 0.001; females, r = 0.55, P < 0.001) and that the appropriate cut-off values of CC denoting reduced muscle mass were 35 cm for males and 33 cm for females. Considering coefficients between CC and ASM coefficients were slightly lower than those reported in previous Western and Japanese studies, which may be attributed to differences in bone, skin fold, and fat distribution reflected in CC in addition to lower limb muscle mass. Such differences are attributed to sex, ethnicity, genetics, environment, and lifestyle.14232425 Among Asians, fat percentage, particularly subcutaneous fat, is higher in males and females with low BMI.26 Furthermore, a traditional Korean diet based on carbohydrates (rice and grains) which lacks protein, as well as elderly Korean lifestyles lack sufficient physical activity, tend to promote fat infiltration.2728 CC, as an indicator of leg muscle mass and subcutaneous fat, better represents muscle mass when subcutaneous fat is minimal (i.e., individuals with malnutrition, chronic conditions, or cadavers).1529 On the other hand, in ambulatory individuals like our participants, the correlation between CC and ASM tends to be weaker.3031 Although the correlation between CC and ASM was relatively weak in the present study, CC was well correlated with physical function. In a previous study by Landi et al.,32 GS was correlated with CC, but, when adjusted for age and BMI, the correlation disappeared. In the present study, physical functions were correlated with CC. Notably, although the correlation between CC and ASM, SMI among the female participants were weaker in the present study (ASM, r = 0.55; SMI, r = 0.42), correlations between low CC and physical functions were similar to those observed in the male subjects, or were even stronger in some physical functions. Moreover, the fact that such correlations were stronger in females, who tend to have greater fat mass in the lower limbs than males, is congruent with outcomes reported by previous studies in which lower limb fat, in addition to lower limb muscle mass, is correlated with muscle function.3334 Bouchard et al.,33 showed that fat mass and leg strength, but not muscle mass were independently predicting physical function in older men and women. Kuyumcu et al.,34 demonstrated that HGS was more strongly correlated with subcutaneous fat in calf, compared with gastrocnemius thickness using ultrasonography. The existing European sarcopenia diagnostic criteria do not recommend CC as an indicator of muscle mass because CC measurements are prone to errors.8 However, based on our results, CC may be treated as an indicator of reduced muscle mass and physical function in Korean elders (Fig. 1). Therefore, CC may be a good indicator of sarcopenia in Korean elders. A prospective longitudinal study would be needed to confirm the correlation between CC and physical function. Although we used ASM measurements using DXA, the gold standard methods of body composition measurement are not DXA but MRI and CT. Therefore, a reference method bias may be present.835 Although we only included the data from the 4 centers using Lunar DXA, there is still the limitation of not having used the same model in all 4 centers. However, each center carried out their own quality control in order to minimize the differences between the centers. Furthermore, because this is a cross-sectional study, a follow-up longitudinal study investigating the predictive validity of CC for physical functions should be conducted. Since calf size was measured only once in this study, we cannot show the correlation for duplicated measurements. Nevertheless, we trained the examiners and tried to increase reliability by allowing them to participate in the study only after passing through a performance test. Nevertheless, this study is the first to suggest a cut-off value of CC for Korean elders, indicated CC is a good proxy marker of reduced muscle mass and may be related with physical function of individuals who represent the 70 to 85-year-olds residing in communities in Korea. Furthermore, CC may be a good indicator of sarcopenia in Korean community-dwelling older adults. The cut-off values of CC for use as indicators of reduced muscle mass are 35 cm for males and 33 cm for females in community-dwelling Korean elders. Reduced muscle mass, based on these cut-off values, is correlated with physical function. Therefore, CC appears to be a proxy marker for muscle mass measured using DXA and may serve as a potential screening tool for sarcopenia.
  32 in total

1.  Development of a simple screening test for sarcopenia in older adults.

Authors:  Shinya Ishii; Tomoki Tanaka; Koji Shibasaki; Yasuyoshi Ouchi; Takeshi Kikutani; Takashi Higashiguchi; Shuichi P Obuchi; Kazuko Ishikawa-Takata; Hirohiko Hirano; Hisashi Kawai; Tetsuo Tsuji; Katsuya Iijima
Journal:  Geriatr Gerontol Int       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.730

Review 2.  The impact of recent technological advances on the trueness and precision of DXA to assess body composition.

Authors:  Rebecca J Toombs; Gaele Ducher; John A Shepherd; Mary Jane De Souza
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  Sarcopenia assessment project in the nursing homes in Turkey.

Authors:  M Halil; Z Ulger; M Varlı; A Döventaş; G B Oztürk; M E Kuyumcu; B B Yavuz; Y Yesil; F Tufan; M Cankurtaran; B Saka; S Sahin; A Curgunlu; N Tekin; F Akçiçek; M A Karan; T Atlı; T Beger; D S Erdinçler; S Arıoğul
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  Skeletal muscle mass and quality: evolution of modern measurement concepts in the context of sarcopenia.

Authors:  Steven B Heymsfield; M Cristina Gonzalez; Jianhua Lu; Guang Jia; Jolene Zheng
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 6.297

Review 5.  Techniques of assessing muscle mass and function (sarcopenia) for epidemiological studies of the elderly.

Authors:  W C Chumlea; S S Guo; B Vellas; Y Guigoz
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Low relative skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) in older persons is associated with functional impairment and physical disability.

Authors:  Ian Janssen; Steven B Heymsfield; Robert Ross
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People.

Authors:  Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Jean Pierre Baeyens; Jürgen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Tommy Cederholm; Francesco Landi; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Yves Rolland; Stéphane M Schneider; Eva Topinková; Maurits Vandewoude; Mauro Zamboni
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 10.668

8.  Calf circumference, frailty and physical performance among older adults living in the community.

Authors:  Francesco Landi; Graziano Onder; Andrea Russo; Rosa Liperoti; Matteo Tosato; Anna Maria Martone; Ettore Capoluongo; Roberto Bernabei
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 9.  Tools in the assessment of sarcopenia.

Authors:  C Cooper; R Fielding; M Visser; L J van Loon; Y Rolland; E Orwoll; K Reid; S Boonen; W Dere; S Epstein; B Mitlak; Y Tsouderos; A A Sayer; R Rizzoli; J Y Reginster; J A Kanis
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Prevalence of sarcopenia among community-dwelling elderly of a medium-sized South American city: results of the COMO VAI? study.

Authors:  Thiago G Barbosa-Silva; Renata M Bielemann; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Ana Maria B Menezes
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 12.910

View more
  26 in total

1.  Acute Effects of Sedentary Behavior on Ankle Torque Assessed with a Custom-Made Electronic Dynamometer.

Authors:  Iulia Iovanca Dragoi; Florina Georgeta Popescu; Teodor Petrita; Florin Alexa; Sorin Barac; Cosmina Ioana Bondor; Elena-Ana Pauncu; Frank L Bowling; Neil D Reeves; Mihai Ionac
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Singapore multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on muscle health in older adults: assessment and multimodal targeted intervention across the continuum of care.

Authors:  Samuel T H Chew; Geetha Kayambu; Charles Chin Han Lew; Tze Pin Ng; Fangyi Ong; Jonathan Tan; Ngiap Chuan Tan; Shuen-Loong Tham
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Nutritional features-based clustering analysis as a feasible approach for early identification of malnutrition in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Liangyu Yin; Jie Liu; Xin Lin; Na Li; Jing Guo; Yang Fan; Ling Zhang; Muli Shi; Hongmei Zhang; Xiao Chen; Chang Wang; Li Deng; Wei Li; Zhenming Fu; Chunhua Song; Zengqing Guo; Jiuwei Cui; Hanping Shi; Hongxia Xu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.884

4.  Calf circumference: cutoff values from the NHANES 1999-2006.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Ali Mehrnezhad; Nariman Razaviarab; Thiago G Barbosa-Silva; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.472

5.  Factors associated with muscle mass in community-dwelling older people in Singapore: Findings from the SHIELD study.

Authors:  Siew Ling Tey; Samuel Teong Huang Chew; Choon How How; Menaka Yalawar; Geraldine Baggs; Wai Leng Chow; Magdalin Cheong; Rebecca Hui San Ong; Farah Safdar Husain; Shuyi Charmaine Kwan; Cynthia Yan Ling Tan; Yen Ling Low; Ngiap Chuan Tan; Dieu Thi Thu Huynh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Gait speed as a mediator of the effect of sarcopenia on dependency in activities of daily living.

Authors:  Miguel A Perez-Sousa; Luis Carlos Venegas-Sanabria; Diego Andrés Chavarro-Carvajal; Carlos Alberto Cano-Gutierrez; Mikel Izquierdo; Jorge Enrique Correa-Bautista; Robinson Ramírez-Vélez
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 12.910

7.  Prognostic value of a rapid sarcopenia measure in acutely ill older adults.

Authors:  Márlon J R Aliberti; Claudia Szlejf; Kenneth E Covinsky; Sei J Lee; Wilson Jacob-Filho; Claudia K Suemoto
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 7.324

8.  Geriatrics Fact Sheet in Korea 2021.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Baek; Eunju Lee; Hee-Won Jung; Il-Young Jang
Journal:  Ann Geriatr Med Res       Date:  2021-06-29

9.  Calf Circumference as a Screening Tool for Cognitive Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS).

Authors:  Miji Kim; Min Jeong Jeong; Jinho Yoo; Da Young Song; Chang Won Won
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Mid-Upper Arm Circumference as an Alternative Screening Instrument to Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass Index for Diagnosing Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Feng-Juan Hu; Hu Liu; Xiao-Lei Liu; Shu-Li Jia; Li-Sha Hou; Xin Xia; Bi-Rong Dong
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.