Maria Cristina Gonzalez1,2, Ali Mehrnezhad3, Nariman Razaviarab3, Thiago G Barbosa-Silva4, Steven B Heymsfield2. 1. Post-Graduate Program in Health and Behavior, Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. 2. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, LSU System, Baton Rouge, LA, USA. 3. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA. 4. Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Calf circumference (CC) is used in geriatric studies as a simple and practical skeletal muscle (SM) marker for diagnosing low SM and sarcopenia. Currently applied CC cutoff points were developed in samples including older participants; values representative of the full adult lifespan are lacking. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to develop CC cutoff points and to identify relevant confounding factors from the large and diverse NHANES 1999-2006 population sample. METHODS: Demographic, anthropometric, and imaging data (DXA, appendicular lean mass) from the adult (age ≥18 y) NHANES sample were partitioned into subgroups according to sex, age, ethnicity, and race. Adults aged 18-39 y and BMI (in kg/m2) 18.5-24.9 were set as a reference population; CC cutoff points were derived at 1 and 2 SDs below the mean. RESULTS: The sample included 17,789 participants, 51.3% males and 48.7% females, with respective ages (mean ± SD) of 43.3 ± 16.1 y and 45.5 ± 16.9 y. CC was strongly correlated with appendicular lean mass, r = 0.84 and 0.86 for males and females (both P < 0.001), respectively. Significant differences in mean CC were present across sex, ethnic, self-reported race, and BMI groups. Adjusting CC for adiposity using BMI revealed a decrease in CC beginning after the second decade in males and third decade in females. Rounded CC cutoff values for moderately and severely low CC were 34 cm and 32 cm (males), and 33 cm and 31 cm (females), respectively. Our findings support the use of BMI-adjusted CC values for participants outside the normal-weight BMI range (18-24.9). CONCLUSIONS: This study defined CC values in a diverse population sample along with a BMI-adjustment approach that helps to remove the confounding effects of adiposity and thereby improves CC as a useful clinical estimate of SM mass.
BACKGROUND: Calf circumference (CC) is used in geriatric studies as a simple and practical skeletal muscle (SM) marker for diagnosing low SM and sarcopenia. Currently applied CC cutoff points were developed in samples including older participants; values representative of the full adult lifespan are lacking. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to develop CC cutoff points and to identify relevant confounding factors from the large and diverse NHANES 1999-2006 population sample. METHODS: Demographic, anthropometric, and imaging data (DXA, appendicular lean mass) from the adult (age ≥18 y) NHANES sample were partitioned into subgroups according to sex, age, ethnicity, and race. Adults aged 18-39 y and BMI (in kg/m2) 18.5-24.9 were set as a reference population; CC cutoff points were derived at 1 and 2 SDs below the mean. RESULTS: The sample included 17,789 participants, 51.3% males and 48.7% females, with respective ages (mean ± SD) of 43.3 ± 16.1 y and 45.5 ± 16.9 y. CC was strongly correlated with appendicular lean mass, r = 0.84 and 0.86 for males and females (both P < 0.001), respectively. Significant differences in mean CC were present across sex, ethnic, self-reported race, and BMI groups. Adjusting CC for adiposity using BMI revealed a decrease in CC beginning after the second decade in males and third decade in females. Rounded CC cutoff values for moderately and severely low CC were 34 cm and 32 cm (males), and 33 cm and 31 cm (females), respectively. Our findings support the use of BMI-adjusted CC values for participants outside the normal-weight BMI range (18-24.9). CONCLUSIONS: This study defined CC values in a diverse population sample along with a BMI-adjustment approach that helps to remove the confounding effects of adiposity and thereby improves CC as a useful clinical estimate of SM mass.
Authors: Gulistan Bahat; Asli Tufan; Fatih Tufan; Cihan Kilic; Timur Selçuk Akpinar; Murat Kose; Nilgun Erten; Mehmet Akif Karan; Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Nicolaas E P Deutz; Ione Ashurst; Maria D Ballesteros; Danielle E Bear; Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Laurence Genton; Francesco Landi; Alessandro Laviano; Kristina Norman; Carla M Prado Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Lorenzo M Donini; Luca Busetto; Juergen M Bauer; Stephan Bischoff; Yves Boirie; Tommy Cederholm; Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Dror Dicker; Gema Frühbeck; Andrea Giustina; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Ho-Seong Han; Steven B Heymsfield; Takashi Higashiguchi; Alessandro Laviano; Andrea Lenzi; Edda Parrinello; Eleonora Poggiogalle; Carla M Prado; Javier Salvador Rodriguez; Yves Rolland; Ferruccio Santini; Mario Siervo; Francesco Tecilazich; Roberto Vettor; Jianchun Yu; Mauro Zamboni; Rocco Barazzoni Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Thiago Gonzalez Barbosa-Silva; Ana Maria Baptista Menezes; Renata Moraes Bielemann; Theodore K Malmstrom; Maria Cristina Gonzalez Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-09-17 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Zhao Chen; ZiMian Wang; Timothy Lohman; Steven B Heymsfield; Eric Outwater; Jennifer S Nicholas; Tamsen Bassford; Andrea LaCroix; Duane Sherrill; Mark Punyanitya; Guanglin Wu; Scott Going Journal: J Nutr Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Marco Alessandro Minetto; Angelo Pietrobelli; Chiara Busso; Jonathan P Bennett; Andrea Ferraris; John A Shepherd; Steven B Heymsfield Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-05-30
Authors: Lorenzo M Donini; Luca Busetto; Stephan C Bischoff; Tommy Cederholm; Maria D Ballesteros-Pomar; John A Batsis; Juergen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Dror Dicker; Stefano Frara; Gema Frühbeck; Laurence Genton; Yftach Gepner; Andrea Giustina; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Ho-Seong Han; Steven B Heymsfield; Takashi Higashiguchi; Alessandro Laviano; Andrea Lenzi; Ibolya Nyulasi; Edda Parrinello; Eleonora Poggiogalle; Carla M Prado; Javier Salvador; Yves Rolland; Ferruccio Santini; Mireille J Serlie; Hanping Shi; Cornel C Sieber; Mario Siervo; Roberto Vettor; Dennis T Villareal; Dorothee Volkert; Jianchun Yu; Mauro Zamboni; Rocco Barazzoni Journal: Obes Facts Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 4.807
Authors: I A Osuna-Padilla; N C Rodríguez-Moguel; S Rodríguez-Llamazares; C E Orsso; C M Prado; M A Ríos-Ayala; O Villanueva-Camacho; A Aguilar-Vargas; L E Pensado-Piedra; F Juárez-Hernández; C M Hernández-Cárdenas Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Carla M Prado; Alessandro Laviano; Chelsia Gillis; Anthony D Sung; Maureen Gardner; Suayib Yalcin; Suzanne Dixon; Shila M Newman; Michael D Bastasch; Abby C Sauer; Refaat Hegazi; Martin R Chasen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Alberto Zucchelli; F Manzoni; A Marengoni; G Bellelli; A Morandi; S Di Santo; E Rossi; M G Valsecchi; M Inzitari; A Cherubini; M Bo; E Mossello Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Jenelle Loeliger; Lara Edbrooke; Robin M Daly; Jane Stewart; Lucy Bucci; Carmen Puskas; Marnie Fitzgerald; Brenton J Baguley; Nicole Kiss Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.390