| Literature DB >> 29760471 |
Ganesh Ingavle1, Les Baillie2, Nathan Davies3, Nigel Beaton3, Yishan Zheng1, Sergey Mikhalovsky1, Susan Sandeman4.
Abstract
Whilst various remedialEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29760471 PMCID: PMC5951949 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25678-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The process of cryogel formation and macro-meso pore size distribution. (A) The different stages that occur during cryogelation. (B) Macropore size distribution as determined by mercury porosimetry and inset SEM images showing internal porous architecture, Scale bar = 20 μm. (C) N2 adsorption isotherm with inset image representing mesopore size distribution.
Figure 2Schematic representation illustrating the glutaraldehyde activation approach utilized for protein-A conjugation and covalent immobilisation of monoclonal antibodies via protein-A on epoxy containing cryogel and subsequent crosslinking using dimethyl pimelimidate (DMP). Ethylenediamine was used as a donor of a spacer arm to improve binding between affinity ligand (protein-A) and antibody by overcoming any effect of steric hindrance.
Figure 3(A) Lab scale in vitro experimental setup for the circulation of PA-spiked whole blood (from healthy donors). (B) A schematic representation of the in vitro circuit utilized for blood perfusion studies. (C) Vertical cross section of cryogel adsorbent column sitting in a plastic casing and cartoon illustration displaying antibody-antigen interactions inside interconnected porous cryogel structure. The adsorbent device is disposable, consisting of antibodies covalently coupled to the cryogel surface through protein-A which is located throughout the interconnected pores. Anthrax protective antigen in the blood is transported via convection and diffusion through the 10–100 μm pores in the cryogel matrix where they are bound.
Figure 4(A) Plasma and (B) whole blood PA concentration at indicated time points as determined by sandwich ELISA. Bar graphs shown are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Significant differences between cryogel groups were determined using a two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test to compare concentration of PA removed by cryogels. ‘*’Indicates significant different values within the same group (p < 0.05), while ‘#’values indicate statistically significant differences between the cryogel groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 5(A) An ex vivo extracorporeal circuit incorporating cryogel columns. (B) The principle of the anti-PA sandwich ELISA used to measure plasma PA concentrations of PA left in a rat blood. (C) Measurable rat plasma PA concentrations immediately after administration by IV infusion (time = −60 minutes) or IP bolus. Time 0 was set at 60 minutes post IP bolus or at the end of the infusion period, with the remaining samples taken at hourly intervals. (D) Plasma PA concentration in circulating rat blood at 0 (at the end of a 60-minute IV infusion; administered initially at 100 μg/kg, followed by a maintenance infusion at 40 μg/kg for the final 2 hours), 1 and 2-hour time points. Graphs shown are mean ± standard deviation (n = 6, p < 0.01).
Figure 6Biochemical analysis results of (A) albumin, (B) ALT, (C) AST, (D) total protein, (E) glucose, (F) creatinine, and (G) urea concentrations in rat blood measured before PA IV infusion and at the end of the circuit. No statistically significant differences were noted.