Literature DB >> 29760168

Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants.

Pieter Coenen1,2, Maaike A Huysmans1, Andreas Holtermann3,4, Niklas Krause5, Willem van Mechelen1,6,7,8, Leon M Straker2, Allard J van der Beek1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent evidence suggests the existence of a physical activity paradox, with beneficial health outcomes associated with leisure time physical activity, but detrimental health outcomes for those engaging in high level occupational physical activity. This is the first quantitative systematic review of evidence regarding the association between occupational physical activity and all-cause mortality.
DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCE: A literature search was performed in electronic databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We screened for peer reviewed articles from prospective studies assessing the association of occupational physical activity with all-cause mortality. A meta-analysis assessed the association of high (compared with low) level occupational physical activity with all-cause mortality, estimating pooled hazard ratios (HR) (with 95% CI).
RESULTS: 2490 unique articles were screened and 33 (from 26 studies) were included. Data from 17 studies (with 193 696 participants) were used in a meta-analysis, showing that men with high level occupational physical activity had an 18% increased risk of early mortality compared with those engaging in low level occupational physical activity (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.34). No such association was observed among women, for whom instead a tendency for an inverse association was found (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review indicate detrimental health consequences associated with high level occupational physical activity in men, even when adjusting for relevant factors (such as leisure time physical activity). These findings suggest that research and physical activity guidelines may differentiate between occupational and leisure time physical activity. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  meta-analysis; physical activity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29760168     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  69 in total

1.  Adolescent and Young Adult Recreational, Occupational, and Transportation Activity: Activity Recommendation and Weight Status Relationships.

Authors:  Connor A Moseley; Asheley C Skinner; Eliana M Perrin; Sarah C Armstrong; Eric D Peterson; Charlene A Wong
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  Sedentary Time and Physical Activity Across Occupational Classifications.

Authors:  Tyler D Quinn; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Juned Siddique; David Aaby; Kara M Whitaker; Abbi Lane-Cordova; Stephen Sidney; Barbara Sternfield; Bethany Barone Gibbs
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2019-11-14

3.  The physical activity health paradox and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional compositional data analysis in the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

Authors:  Melker S Johansson; Andreas Holtermann; Jacob L Marott; Eva Prescott; Peter Schnohr; Mette Korshøj; Karen Søgaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Occupational Physical Activity and Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Benny Rana; Liang Hu; Andrew Harper; Chao Cao; Cheryl Peters; Darren Brenner; Lin Yang
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Behavioural interventions for CVD risk reduction for blue-collar workers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Melissa M Crane; Shannon Halloway; Zoe L Walts; Kara L Gavin; Angela Moss; Jennifer C Westrick; Bradley M Appelhans
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Cardiorespiratory Fitness Is Associated with a Reduced Cardiovascular Risk in Occupational Groups with Different Working Conditions: A Cross-Sectional Study among Police Officers and Office Workers.

Authors:  Markus Strauss; Peter Foshag; Anna Brzęk; Richard Vollenberg; Ulrich Jehn; Henning Littwitz; Roman Leischik
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Health Risk Behavior Profile of Construction Workers, 32 States, 2013 to 2016.

Authors:  Winifred L Boal; Jia Li; Xiuwen Sue Dong; Aaron Sussell
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.162

8.  Heart rate during work and heart rate variability during the following night: a day-by-day investigation on the physical activity paradox among blue-collar workers.

Authors:  Mette Korshøj; Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Tatiana de Oliveira Sato; Andreas Holtermann; David Hallman
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 9.  The effect of leisure time physical activity and sedentary behaviour on the health of workers with different occupational physical activity demands: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie A Prince; Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Aviroop Biswas; Andreas Holtermann; Tarnbir Aulakh; Katherine Merucci; Pieter Coenen
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Associations of recreational and non-recreational physical activity with coronary artery calcium density vs. volume and cardiovascular disease events: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Isac C Thomas; Michelle L Takemoto; Nketi I Forbang; Britta A Larsen; Erin D Michos; Robyn L McClelland; Matthew A Allison; Matthew J Budoff; Michael H Criqui
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 9.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.