Susan Jongstra1, Willem A van Gool2, Eric P Moll van Charante3, Jan-Willem van Dalen2, Lisa S M Eurelings2, Edo Richard2,4, Suzanne A Ligthart3. 1. Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands s.jongstra@amc.uva.nl. 2. Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is one of the most widely used instruments to screen for cognitive deficits; however, this instrument alone is not sensitive enough to detect early symptoms of dementia. We aimed to investigate whether additionally using the Visual Association Test (VAT) improves the predictive value of the MMSE score for development of dementia. METHODS: Analyses were based on data from 2,690 primary care patients aged 70 to 78 years who participated in the Prevention of Dementia by Intensive Vascular Care (preDIVA) trial. We assessed change in the 30-point MMSE score over 2 years and the VAT score at 2 years-dichotomized as perfect (6 points) or imperfect (≤5 points)-and evaluated the predictive values of these tests for a diagnosis of dementia in the subsequent 4 to 6 years. Data were analyzed with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients having a decline of 2 points or more in total MMSE score over 2 years had an odds ratio of 3.55 (95% CI, 2.51-5.00) for developing dementia. Patients having the same decline in MMSE score plus an imperfect VAT score had an odds ratio of 9.55 (95% CI, 5.89-15.41) for developing dementia. A 1-point decline in MMSE score increased odds of dementia only when the VAT score was imperfect. Dementia risk for patients with a 2- or 3-point decrease in MMSE score and a perfect VAT score did not differ significantly from the average risk of the cohort as a whole. CONCLUSIONS: Administering the VAT in patients with a small decline on the MMSE over a 2-year period has substantial incremental value for identifying those at elevated risk for developing dementia. This simple test may help distinguish older adults who need further cognitive examination from those in whom a watchful waiting policy is justified.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is one of the most widely used instruments to screen for cognitive deficits; however, this instrument alone is not sensitive enough to detect early symptoms of dementia. We aimed to investigate whether additionally using the Visual Association Test (VAT) improves the predictive value of the MMSE score for development of dementia. METHODS: Analyses were based on data from 2,690 primary care patients aged 70 to 78 years who participated in the Prevention of Dementia by Intensive Vascular Care (preDIVA) trial. We assessed change in the 30-point MMSE score over 2 years and the VAT score at 2 years-dichotomized as perfect (6 points) or imperfect (≤5 points)-and evaluated the predictive values of these tests for a diagnosis of dementia in the subsequent 4 to 6 years. Data were analyzed with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS:Patients having a decline of 2 points or more in total MMSE score over 2 years had an odds ratio of 3.55 (95% CI, 2.51-5.00) for developing dementia. Patients having the same decline in MMSE score plus an imperfect VAT score had an odds ratio of 9.55 (95% CI, 5.89-15.41) for developing dementia. A 1-point decline in MMSE score increased odds of dementia only when the VAT score was imperfect. Dementia risk for patients with a 2- or 3-point decrease in MMSE score and a perfect VAT score did not differ significantly from the average risk of the cohort as a whole. CONCLUSIONS: Administering the VAT in patients with a small decline on the MMSE over a 2-year period has substantial incremental value for identifying those at elevated risk for developing dementia. This simple test may help distinguish older adults who need further cognitive examination from those in whom a watchful waiting policy is justified.
Authors: Edo Richard; Esther Van den Heuvel; Eric P Moll van Charante; Lenny Achthoven; Marinus Vermeulen; Patrick J Bindels; Willem A Van Gool Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2009 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: J Stein; M Luppa; W Maier; M Wagner; S Wolfsgruber; M Scherer; M Köhler; M Eisele; S Weyerer; J Werle; H Bickel; E Mösch; B Wiese; J Prokein; M Pentzek; A Fuchs; H Leicht; H-H König; S G Riedel-Heller Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Eric P Moll van Charante; Edo Richard; Lisa S Eurelings; Jan-Willem van Dalen; Suzanne A Ligthart; Emma F van Bussel; Marieke P Hoevenaar-Blom; Marinus Vermeulen; Willem A van Gool Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Cyndy B Cordell; Soo Borson; Malaz Boustani; Joshua Chodosh; David Reuben; Joe Verghese; William Thies; Leslie B Fried Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Lennard L van Wanrooij; Edo Richard; Susan Jongstra; Eric P Moll van Charante; Willem A van Gool Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Herrer Abdulrahman; Edo Richard; Willem A van Gool; Eric P Moll van Charante; Jan Willem van Dalen Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2022 Impact factor: 4.472