Literature DB >> 29758405

Accelerometer-based atrioventricular synchronous pacing with a ventricular leadless pacemaker: Results from the Micra atrioventricular feasibility studies.

Larry Chinitz1, Philippe Ritter2, Surinder Kaur Khelae3, Saverio Iacopino4, Christophe Garweg5, Maria Grazia-Bongiorni6, Petr Neuzil7, Jens Brock Johansen8, Lluis Mont9, Efrain Gonzalez10, Venkata Sagi11, Gabor Z Duray12, Nicolas Clementy13, Todd Sheldon14, Vincent Splett14, Kurt Stromberg14, Nicole Wood14, Clemens Steinwender15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Micra is a leadless pacemaker that is implanted in the right ventricle and provides rate response via a 3-axis accelerometer (ACC). Custom software was developed to detect atrial contraction using the ACC enabling atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to sense atrial contractions from the Micra ACC signal and provide AV synchronous pacing.
METHODS: The Micra Accelerometer Sensor Sub-Study (MASS) and MASS2 early feasibility studies showed intracardiac accelerations related to atrial contraction can be measured via ACC in the Micra leadless pacemaker. The Micra Atrial TRacking Using A Ventricular AccELerometer (MARVEL) study was a prospective multicenter study designed to characterize the closed-loop performance of an AV synchronous algorithm downloaded into previously implanted Micra devices. Atrioventricular synchrony (AVS) was measured during 30 minutes of rest and during VVI pacing. AVS was defined as a P wave visible on surface ECG followed by a ventricular event <300 ms.
RESULTS: A total of 64 patients completed the MARVEL study procedure at 12 centers in 9 countries. Patients were implanted with a Micra for a median of 6.0 months (range 0-41.4). High-degree AV block was present in 33 patients, whereas 31 had predominantly intrinsic conduction during the study. Average AVS during AV algorithm pacing was 87.0% (95% confidence interval 81.8%-90.9%), 80.0% in high-degree block patients and 94.4% in patients with intrinsic conduction. AVS was significantly greater (P <.001) during AV algorithm pacing compared to VVI in high-degree block patients, whereas AVS was maintained in patients with intrinsic conduction.
CONCLUSION: Accelerometer-based atrial sensing is feasible and significantly improves AVS in patients with AV block and a single-chamber leadless pacemaker implanted in the right ventricle.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometer; Atrial contraction; Atrioventricular block; Atrioventricular synchronous pacing; Leadless pacemaker

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29758405     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Micra™ leadless pacemaker : Clinical experience and perspectives].

Authors:  Clemens Steinwender; Hermann Blessberger; Daniel Kiblböck; Karim Saleh; Jürgen Kammler
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-11-19

Review 2.  [Leadless pacemakers and subcutaneously implantable cardioverter defibrillators].

Authors:  C Stellbrink; B Hansky; D Meyer Zu Vilsendorf
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 3.  Leadless Pacemakers: Recent and Future Developments.

Authors:  Anne Kroman; Basil Saour; Jordan M Prutkin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-09-05

4.  Intraoperative sensing increase predicts long-term pacing threshold in leadless pacemakers.

Authors:  Gianfranco Mitacchione; Gianmarco Arabia; Marco Schiavone; Manuel Cerini; Alessio Gasperetti; Francesca Salghetti; Luca Bontempi; Maurizio Viecca; Antonio Curnis; Giovanni B Forleo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  [New developments in leadless pacing systems].

Authors:  Florian Doldi; Benedikt Biller; Florian Reinke; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  TTE guided synchronization to optimize AV synchronous leadless pacemaker programming.

Authors:  George Mawardi; Patricia Rodriguez; Sula Mazimba; Nishaki Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Images Med Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-07

7.  VVI pacing with normal QRS duration and ventricular function: MOST trial findings relevant to leadless pacemakers.

Authors:  Zak Loring; Rebecca North; Anne S Hellkamp; Brett D Atwater; Camille G Frazier-Mills; Kevin P Jackson; Sean D Pokorney; Gervasio A Lamas; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 8.  Electrical Stimulation for Low-Energy Termination of Cardiac Arrhythmias: a Review.

Authors:  Skylar Buchan; Ronit Kar; Mathews John; Allison Post; Mehdi Razavi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 9.  Innovations in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Authors:  Khurrum Khan; Jitae A Kim; Andra Gurgu; Muzamil Khawaja; Dragos Cozma; Mihail G Chelu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.947

10.  Successful implantation of a leadless pacemaker in a patient with complete atrioventricular block and congenital absence of superior vena cava: a case report.

Authors:  Taiyo Kawaguchi; Shoichiro Yatsu; Tomoyuki Shiozawa; Satoru Suwa
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.