Literature DB >> 29758081

Correction: Sex, pregnancy and aortic disease in Marfan syndrome.

Marjolijn Renard, Laura Muiño-Mosquera, Elise C Manalo, Sara Tufa, Eric J Carlson, Douglas R Keene, Julie De Backer, Lynn Y Sakai.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181166.].

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29758081      PMCID: PMC5951569          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


In Table 1, the z-scores for aortic root diameter at baseline were calculated based on an older version of the formula (Roman et al. 1989) instead of the more recent and generally accepted updated formula (Devereux et al. 2012). Please see the corrected Table 1 here.
Table 1

Characteristics of the aortic root of MFS patients at baseline and after several years of follow-up.

menwomen
non-pregnantpregnantp-value
n101010
age (year)26 (±10)27 (±6)27 (±3)0.899
aortic root at baseline (mm)40.8 (±3.52)36.9 (±2.97)35 (±3.40)0.002a
Z-scores at baseline2.67 (±1.23)2.87 (±1.24)1.76 (±1.40)0.142
aortic root at follow-up (mm)42.5 (±2.80)37.9 (±3.10)38.7 (±3.52)0.007b
follow-up time (year)5.00 (±2.75)5.09 (±2.66)6.63 (±3.74)0.341
aortic root growth rate (mm/year)0.36 (±0.35)0,.2 (±0.39)0.64 (±0.42)0.022c

Results are given as means with the standard deviation between brackets. Significant p-values (<0.05) are indicated in bold.

a Values are significantly different between men and non-pregnant and pregnant women (p = 0.040 and p = 0.002, respectively), but not between the non-pregnant and pregnant women (p = 0.623).

b Values are also significantly different when pairwise comparing men and non-pregnant and pregnant women (p = 0.010 and p = 0.038, respectively).

c Significant difference only between non-pregnant and pregnant women (p = 0.018). No significant difference was observed between men and non-pregnant (p = 0.559) or pregnant women (p = 0.352).

Results are given as means with the standard deviation between brackets. Significant p-values (<0.05) are indicated in bold. a Values are significantly different between men and non-pregnant and pregnant women (p = 0.040 and p = 0.002, respectively), but not between the non-pregnant and pregnant women (p = 0.623). b Values are also significantly different when pairwise comparing men and non-pregnant and pregnant women (p = 0.010 and p = 0.038, respectively). c Significant difference only between non-pregnant and pregnant women (p = 0.018). No significant difference was observed between men and non-pregnant (p = 0.559) or pregnant women (p = 0.352).
  3 in total

1.  Normal limits in relation to age, body size and gender of two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in persons ≥15 years of age.

Authors:  Richard B Devereux; Giovanni de Simone; Donna K Arnett; Lyle G Best; Eric Boerwinkle; Barbara V Howard; Dalane Kitzman; Elisa T Lee; Thomas H Mosley; Alan Weder; Mary J Roman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults.

Authors:  M J Roman; R B Devereux; R Kramer-Fox; J O'Loughlin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Sex, pregnancy and aortic disease in Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Marjolijn Renard; Laura Muiño-Mosquera; Elise C Manalo; Sara Tufa; Eric J Carlson; Douglas R Keene; Julie De Backer; Lynn Y Sakai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.