Literature DB >> 29757618

Does Size Matter? An Experimental Evaluation of the Relative Abundance and Decay Rates of Aquatic Environmental DNA.

Jonas Bylemans, Elise M Furlan, Dianne M Gleeson, Christopher M Hardy1, Richard P Duncan.   

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is increasingly used to monitor aquatic macrofauna. Typically, short mitochondrial DNA fragments are targeted because these should be relatively more abundant in the environment as longer fragments will break into smaller fragments over time. However, longer fragments may permit more flexible primer design and increase taxonomic resolution for eDNA metabarcoding analyses, and recent studies have shown that long mitochondrial eDNA fragments can be extracted from environmental water samples. Nuclear eDNA fragments have also been proposed as targets, but little is known about their persistence in the aquatic environment. Here we measure the abundance of mitochondrial eDNA fragments of different lengths and of short nuclear eDNA fragments, originating from captive fish in experimental tanks, and we test whether longer mitochondrial and short nuclear fragments decay faster than short mitochondrial fragments following fish removal. We show that when fish are present, shorter mitochondrial fragments are more abundant in water samples than both longer mitochondrial fragments and short nuclear eDNA fragments. However, the rate of decay following fish removal was similar for all fragment types, suggesting that the differences in abundance resulted from differences in the rates at which different fragment types were produced rather than differences in their decay rates.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29757618     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  18 in total

1.  Environmental DNA for improved detection and environmental surveillance of schistosomiasis.

Authors:  Mita E Sengupta; Micaela Hellström; Henry C Kariuki; Annette Olsen; Philip F Thomsen; Helena Mejer; Eske Willerslev; Mariam T Mwanje; Henry Madsen; Thomas K Kristensen; Anna-Sofie Stensgaard; Birgitte J Vennervald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity.

Authors:  Jori B Harrison; Jennifer M Sunday; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Can nuclear aquatic environmental DNA be a genetic marker for the accurate estimation of species abundance?

Authors:  Toshiaki S Jo; Kenji Tsuri; Hiroki Yamanaka
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2022-07-21

4.  Shotgun Metagenomics Reveals Taxonomic and Functional Shifts in Hot Water Microbiome Due to Temperature Setting and Stagnation.

Authors:  Dongjuan Dai; William J Rhoads; Marc A Edwards; Amy Pruden
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  An improved environmental DNA assay for bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) based on the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer I.

Authors:  Joseph C Dysthe; Thomas W Franklin; Kevin S McKelvey; Michael K Young; Michael K Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Toward an ecoregion scale evaluation of eDNA metabarcoding primers: A case study for the freshwater fish biodiversity of the Murray-Darling Basin (Australia).

Authors:  Jonas Bylemans; Dianne M Gleeson; Christopher M Hardy; Elise Furlan
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 7.  Beyond Biodiversity: Can Environmental DNA (eDNA) Cut It as a Population Genetics Tool?

Authors:  Clare I M Adams; Michael Knapp; Neil J Gemmell; Gert-Jan Jeunen; Michael Bunce; Miles D Lamare; Helen R Taylor
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Parasite detection in the ornamental fish trade using environmental DNA.

Authors:  A Trujillo-González; R C Edmunds; J A Becker; K S Hutson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Validation of COI metabarcoding primers for terrestrial arthropods.

Authors:  Vasco Elbrecht; Thomas W A Braukmann; Natalia V Ivanova; Sean W J Prosser; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Michael Wright; Evgeny V Zakharov; Paul D N Hebert; Dirk Steinke
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Environmental (e)RNA advances the reliability of eDNA by predicting its age.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Marshall; Henry A Vanderploeg; Subba Rao Chaganti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.