OBJECTIVE: Umbilical hernia and paraumbilical hernia are ventral herniae that occur in infants and adults. According to current evidence, mesh repair is the treatment of choice to avoid recurrence. The aim of this study is to analyze the surgical methods, the types of meshes used, and their benefits. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with umbilical hernia and paraumbilical hernia was performed. The patients' consent was obtained retrospectively. The various surgical techniques and different meshes used were analyzed. Forty-three patients were selected for the study. Of these, 23 patients underwent open mesh repair, 12 patients underwent laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair repair, and eight patients underwent open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair repair. The duration of the surgery, mesh used, number of days of hospital stay, type of anesthesia, and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients, the patients who underwent open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair had shorter postoperative hospital stays compared to other methods (median=1 day; range=1 to 2 days). The duration of surgery was longer for laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair and open mesh repair compared to the open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair technique (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair technique had advantages over the other methods for small-defect umbilical hernia and paraumbilical hernia. The duration of surgery was long for laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair compared to open mesh repair and the open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair technique. Postoperative complications were insignificant for all three methods. Another advantage of the open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair technique was a shorter postoperative hospital stay.
OBJECTIVE: Umbilical hernia and paraumbilical hernia are ventral herniae that occur in infants and adults. According to current evidence, mesh repair is the treatment of choice to avoid recurrence. The aim of this study is to analyze the surgical methods, the types of meshes used, and their benefits. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with umbilical hernia and paraumbilical hernia was performed. The patients' consent was obtained retrospectively. The various surgical techniques and different meshes used were analyzed. Forty-three patients were selected for the study. Of these, 23 patients underwent open mesh repair, 12 patients underwent laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair repair, and eight patients underwent open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair repair. The duration of the surgery, mesh used, number of days of hospital stay, type of anesthesia, and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients, the patients who underwent open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair had shorter postoperative hospital stays compared to other methods (median=1 day; range=1 to 2 days). The duration of surgery was longer for laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair and open mesh repair compared to the open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair technique (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair technique had advantages over the other methods for small-defect umbilical hernia and paraumbilical hernia. The duration of surgery was long for laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair compared to open mesh repair and the open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair technique. Postoperative complications were insignificant for all three methods. Another advantage of the open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair technique was a shorter postoperative hospital stay.
Entities:
Keywords:
IPOM; Open mesh repair; laparoscopy; open IPOM technique
Authors: Frederik Berrevoet; Frederik D'Hont; Xavier Rogiers; Roberto Troisi; Bernard de Hemptinne Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: A Arroyo Sebastián; F Pérez; P Serrano; D Costa; I Oliver; R Ferrer; J Lacueva; R Calpena Journal: Hernia Date: 2002-10-19 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Buckminster Farrow; Samir Awad; David H Berger; Daniel Albo; Liz Lee; Anu Subramanian; Charles F Bellows Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Lucía Lago-Méndez; Márcio Diniz-Freitas; Carmen Senra-Rivera; Francisco Gude-Sampedro; José Manuel Gándara Rey; Abel García-García Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 1.895