Literature DB >> 11578284

Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults.

A Arroyo1, P García, F Pérez, J Andreu, F Candela, R Calpena.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic repair has become the standard method for inguinal hernia and has excellent results. The question remains of whether the mesh technique could also improve results for umbilical defects.
METHODS: The study was a randomized clinical trial comparing herniorrhaphy (primary suture) with hernioplasty (polypropylene mesh or plug) in 200 adult patients with a primary umbilical hernia. Patients at high anaesthetic risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade IV) or those who needed emergency surgery were excluded. The mean postoperative follow-up was 64 months. The population studied included 118 women and 82 men with a mean age at presentation of 57 years. Some 173 patients were ASA grade I-II and 27 were ASA III. The anaesthetic technique of choice was local anaesthetic infiltration plus sedation (98 per cent).
RESULTS: There were no significant anaesthetic complications or surgical deaths. The mean duration of surgery was greater for mesh than for suture repair (45 versus 38 min). Rates of early complications such as seroma, haematoma or wound infection were similar in the two groups. The hernia recurrence rate was higher after suture repair (11 per cent) than after mesh repair (1 per cent) (P = 0.0015).
CONCLUSION: Prosthetic repair could become the standard treatment for primary umbilical hernia in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11578284     DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01893.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  95 in total

1.  Risk factors for chronic pain after open ventral hernia repair by underlay mesh placement.

Authors:  Caroline Gronnier; Jean-Michel Wattier; Hugo Favre; Guillaume Piessen; Christophe Mariette
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Umbilical hernia in adults.

Authors:  H Lau; N G Patil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of postoperative complications after tension-free hernioplasty.

Authors:  Jian-Fang Li; Dan-Dan Lai; Xiao-Dong Zhang; Ai-Min Zhang; Kuan-Xue Sun; Heng-Gui Luo; Zhen Yu
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  A retrospective audit comparing outcomes of open versus laparoscopic repair of umbilical/paraumbilical herniae.

Authors:  T A Solomon; Padma Wignesvaran; Mohammed A Chaudry; Matthew G Tutton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Current options in umbilical hernia repair in adult patients.

Authors:  Hakan Kulaçoğlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-09-01

6.  Comparative investigation of alloplastic materials for hernia repair with improved methodology.

Authors:  M Kapischke; K Prinz; J Tepel; J Tensfeldt; T Schulz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic cure of small ventral hernias with composite mesh.

Authors:  H Johanet; A Dabrowski; P Hauters
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy: a review of 208 cases.

Authors:  C T Frantzides; M A Carlson; J G Zografakis; A K Madan; R E Moore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Assessing the impact of short-term surgical education on practice: a retrospective study of the introduction of mesh for inguinal hernia repair in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Y T Wang; M M Meheš; H-R Naseem; M Ibrahim; M A Butt; N Ahmed; M A Wahab Bin Adam; A-W Issah; I Mohammed; S D Goldstein; K Cartwright; F Abdullah
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.