| Literature DB >> 29755564 |
Sara Shamsabadipour1, Seyed Mohammad Zarei2, Mustafa Ghanadian3, Seyed Abdulmajid Ayatollahi2, Mohammad Reza Rahimnejad1, Hojjatollah Saeedi1, Mahmoud Aghaei4.
Abstract
In this research, aerial parts of Euphorbia denticulata Lam were collected from Sanandaj city in Kurdistan province at the West of Iran. It was extracted by maceration using acetone as solvent. The isolation of compounds were carried out with repeated column chromatography using silica gel and normal preparative HPLC using YMC-Pack-Sil column and hexane: ethyl acetate as mobile phase. The structures of isolated compounds were elucidated by extensive 1 and 2D-NMR as well as HRESI-MS spectra and the cytotoxicity was done against DU-145 human prostate cancer cell line using standard MTT assay. It afforded a new 12-taraxastane derivative and two known cycloartane triterpenes including: taraxast-12-ene-3β,20,21(α)-triol (1), cycloartane-3β,25-diol (2), and cycloartane-3β,24,25-triol (3). They exhibited cytotoxic effects, with IC50 values of 12.2 ± 2.9, 27.5 ± 4.9, and 18.3 ± 1.4 µM, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Cycloartane; Cytotoxicity; Euphorbia denticulate; Prostate Cancer; Taraxastane; Triterpenes
Year: 2018 PMID: 29755564 PMCID: PMC5937103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Figure 1Chemical structures of compounds 1-3 isolated from E. denticulata
1H and 13C NMR Data of Compound 1 at 400 and 100 MHz in CDCl3
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.02 (1H, bdd, | 37.2 (t) |
| 2 | 1.49 (1H, m); 1.54 (1H, m) | 27.7 (t) |
| 3 | 3.18 (1H, dd, | 79.3 (d) |
| 4 | - | 39 (s) |
| 5 | 1.22 (1H, dd, | 50.6 (d) |
| 6 | 1.42 (1H, m); 1.40 (1H, m) | 18.2 (t) |
| 7 | 1.37 (1H, overlapped); 1.73 (1H, m) | 33.9 (t) |
| 8 | - | 43.6 (s) |
| 9 | - | 48.9 (d) |
| 10 | - | 34.9 (s) |
| 11 | 1.86 (1H, m); 2.04 (1H, m) | 23.9 (t) |
| 12 | 5.19 (1H, dd, | 117.8 (d) |
| 13 | - | 145.8 (s) |
| 14 | - | 33.9 (s) |
| 15 | 1.16 (1H, overlapped); 1.61 (1H, m) | 31.8 (t) |
| 16 | 1.21 (1H, m); 1.85 (1H, overlapped) | 28.5 (t) |
| 17 | - | 29.7 (s) |
| 18 | 1.40 (1H, overlapped) | 53.5 (d) |
| 19 | 1.39 (1H, m) | 35.6 (d) |
| 20 | - | 73.2 (s) |
| 21 | 3.29 (1H, dd, | 78.5 (d) |
| 22 | 1.31 (1H, m); 1.29 (1H, m) | 28.7 (t) |
| 23 | 0.9 (3H, s) | 27.6 (q) |
| 24 | 0.79 (3H, s) | 14.7 (q) |
| 25 | 0.67 (3H, s) | 13.1 (q) |
| 26 | 0.76 (3H,s) | 22.1 (q) |
| 27 | 0.91 (3H, s) | 27.3 (q) |
| 28 | 1.10 (3H, s) | 23.2 (q) |
| 29 | 0.78 (3H, d, | 18.5 (q) |
| 30 | 1.15 (3H, s) | 29.6 (q) |
Figure 2COSY (in bold), selected HMBC (H→C), and selected NOESY (H↔C) correlations detected for compound 1