| Literature DB >> 29754440 |
C Prakash Gyawali1, Nicola de Bortoli2, John Clarke3, Carla Marinelli4, Salvatore Tolone5, Sabine Roman6,7,8, Edoardo Savarino4.
Abstract
Esophageal symptoms are common, and can arise from mucosal, motor, functional, and neoplastic processes, among others. Judicious use of diagnostic testing can help define the etiology of symptoms and can direct management. Endoscopy, esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM), ambulatory pH or pH-impedance manometry, and barium radiography are commonly used for esophageal function testing; functional lumen imaging probe is an emerging option. Recent consensus guidelines have provided direction in using test findings toward defining mechanisms of esophageal symptoms. The Chicago Classification describes hierarchical steps in diagnosing esophageal motility disorders. The Lyon Consensus characterizes conclusive evidence on esophageal testing for a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and establishes a motor classification of GERD. Taking these recent advances into consideration, our discussion focuses primarily on the indications, technique, equipment, and interpretation of esophageal HRM and ambulatory reflux monitoring in the evaluation of esophageal symptoms, and describes indications for alternative esophageal tests.Entities:
Keywords: ambulatory pH monitoring; barium radiography; functional lumen imaging probe; high-resolution manometry; pH-impedance monitoring
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29754440 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci ISSN: 0077-8923 Impact factor: 5.691