Michael K Essandoh1, George E Mark2, Johan D Aasbo3, Charles A Joyner4, Saumya Sharma5, Beningo F Decena6, Eric D Bolin7, Raul Weiss8, Martin C Burke9, Timothy R McClernon10, Emile G Daoud8, Michael R Gold11. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. 2. Department of Cardiology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA. 3. The Heart Institute of ProMedica Toledo Hospital, Toledo, OH, USA. 4. Department of Cardiology, Levinson Heart Hospital at Chippenham and Johnston Willis Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA. 5. Department of Electrophysiology, McGovern Medical School - University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Department of Cardiology, Tucson Medical Center and Northwest Medical Center, Tucson, AZ, USA. 7. Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 8. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. 9. CorVita Science Foundation, Chicago, IL, USA. 10. People Architects, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 11. Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Worldwide adoption of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) for preventing sudden cardiac death continues to increase, as longer-term evidence demonstrating the safety and efficacy of the S-ICD expands. As a relatively new technology, comprehensive anesthesia guidance for the management of patients undergoing S-ICD placement is lacking. This article presents advantages and disadvantages of different periprocedural sedation and anesthesia options for S-ICD implants including general anesthesia, monitored anesthesia care, regional anesthesia, and nonanesthesia personnel administered sedation and analgesia. METHODS: Guidance, for approaches to anesthesia care during S-ICD implantation, is presented based upon literature review and consensus of a panel of high-volume S-ICD implanters, a regional anesthesiologist, and a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist with significant S-ICD experience. The panel developed suggested actions for perioperative sedation, anesthesia, surgical practices, and a decision algorithm for S-ICD implantation. CONCLUSIONS: While S-ICD implantation currently requires higher sedation than transvenous ICD systems, the panel consensus is that general anesthesia is not required or is obligatory for the majority of patients for the experienced S-ICD implanter. The focus of the implanting physician and the anesthesia services should be to maximize patient comfort and take into consideration patient-specific comorbidities, with a low threshold to consult the anesthesiology team.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Worldwide adoption of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) for preventing sudden cardiac death continues to increase, as longer-term evidence demonstrating the safety and efficacy of the S-ICD expands. As a relatively new technology, comprehensive anesthesia guidance for the management of patients undergoing S-ICD placement is lacking. This article presents advantages and disadvantages of different periprocedural sedation and anesthesia options for S-ICD implants including general anesthesia, monitored anesthesia care, regional anesthesia, and nonanesthesia personnel administered sedation and analgesia. METHODS: Guidance, for approaches to anesthesia care during S-ICD implantation, is presented based upon literature review and consensus of a panel of high-volume S-ICD implanters, a regional anesthesiologist, and a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist with significant S-ICD experience. The panel developed suggested actions for perioperative sedation, anesthesia, surgical practices, and a decision algorithm for S-ICD implantation. CONCLUSIONS: While S-ICD implantation currently requires higher sedation than transvenous ICD systems, the panel consensus is that general anesthesia is not required or is obligatory for the majority of patients for the experienced S-ICD implanter. The focus of the implanting physician and the anesthesia services should be to maximize patient comfort and take into consideration patient-specific comorbidities, with a low threshold to consult the anesthesiology team.
Authors: Toshimasa Okabe; Adrianne Miller; Tanner Koppert; Rafael Cavalcanti; Diego Alcivar-Franco; Jemina Osei; Omar Kahaly; Muhammad R Afzal; Jaret Tyler; Steven J Kalbfleisch; Raul Weiss; Mahmoud Houmsse; Ralph S Augostini; Emile G Daoud; Michael J Andritsos; Sujatha Bhandary; Galina Dimitrova; Kasey Fiorini; Hamdy Elsayed-Awad; Antolin Flores; Leonid Gorelik; Manoj H Iyer; Samiya Saklayen; Erica Stein; Katja Turner; William Perez; John D Hummel; Michael K Essandoh Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2019-12-07 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Raul Weiss; George E Mark; Mikhael F El-Chami; Mauro Biffi; Vincent Probst; Pier D Lambiase; Marc A Miller; Timothy McClernon; Linda K Hansen; Bradley P Knight; Larry M Baddour Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Larry M Baddour; Raul Weiss; George E Mark; Mikhael F El-Chami; Mauro Biffi; Vincent Probst; Pier D Lambiase; Marc A Miller; Timothy McClernon; Linda K Hansen; Bradley P Knight Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 1.976