Literature DB >> 29753413

Development of a step-down method for altering male C57BL/6 mouse housing density and hierarchical structure: Preparations for spaceflight studies.

David C Scofield1, Jeffrey D Rytlewski1, Paul Childress1, Kishan Shah1, Aamir Tucker1, Faisal Khan1, Jessica Peveler2, Ding Li3, Todd O McKinley1, Tien-Min G Chu3, Debra L Hickman2, Melissa A Kacena4.   

Abstract

This study was initiated as a component of a larger undertaking designed to study bone healing in microgravity aboard the International Space Station (ISS). Spaceflight experimentation introduces multiple challenges not seen in ground studies, especially with regard to physical space, limited resources, and inability to easily reproduce results. Together, these can lead to diminished statistical power and increased risk of failure. It is because of the limited space, and need for improved statistical power by increasing sample size over historical numbers, NASA studies involving mice require housing mice at densities higher than recommended in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council, 2011). All previous NASA missions in which mice were co-housed, involved female mice; however, in our spaceflight studies examining bone healing, male mice are required for optimal experimentation. Additionally, the logistics associated with spaceflight hardware and our study design necessitated variation of density and cohort make up during the experiment. This required the development of a new method to successfully co-house male mice while varying mouse density and hierarchical structure. For this experiment, male mice in an experimental housing schematic of variable density (Spaceflight Correlate) analogous to previously established NASA spaceflight studies was compared to a standard ground based housing schematic (Normal Density Controls) throughout the experimental timeline. We hypothesized that mice in the Spaceflight Correlate group would show no significant difference in activity, aggression, or stress when compared to Normal Density Controls. Activity and aggression were assessed using a novel activity scoring system (based on prior literature, validated in-house) and stress was assessed via body weights, organ weights, and veterinary assessment. No significant differences were detected between the Spaceflight Correlate group and the Normal Density Controls in activity, aggression, body weight, or organ weight, which was confirmed by veterinary assessments. Completion of this study allowed for clearance by NASA of our bone healing experiments aboard the ISS, and our experiment was successfully launched February 19, 2017 on SpaceX CRS-10.
Copyright © 2018 The Committee on Space Research (COSPAR). Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aggression; Behavior; Mouse housing density; Spaceflight; Stress

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29753413      PMCID: PMC6196723          DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2018.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)        ISSN: 2214-5524


  20 in total

1.  Floor space needs for laboratory mice: BALB/cJ males or females in solid-bottom cages with bedding.

Authors:  J J McGlone; D L Anderson; R L Norman
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2001-05

2.  Body weight gain and diurnal differences of corticosterone changes in response to acute and chronic stress in rats.

Authors:  S Retana-Márquez; H Bonilla-Jaime; G Vázquez-Palacios; E Domínguez-Salazar; R Martínez-García; J Velázquez-Moctezuma
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.905

3.  The response of C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice to increased housing density.

Authors:  Charmaine Foltz; David DeLong
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Time-course of the murine lymphoid tissue involution during and following stressor exposure.

Authors:  L Domínguez-Gerpe; M Rey-Méndez
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.037

5.  Floor Space Needs for Laboratory Mice: C56BL/6 Males in Solid-bottom Cages with Bedding.

Authors:  Steven Fullwood; Tiffanie A. Hicks; Jack C. Brown; Reid L. Norman; John J. McGlone
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  1998-12

6.  Corticosterone, adrenal and spleen weight in mice after tail bleeding, and its effect on nearby animals.

Authors:  J S Tuli; J A Smith; D B Morton
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Effects of spaceflight on trabecular bone in rats.

Authors:  W S Jee; T J Wronski; E R Morey; D B Kimmel
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1983-03

8.  Lack of effect of spaceflight on bone mass and bone formation in group-housed rats.

Authors:  T J Wronski; M Li; Y Shen; S C Miller; B M Bowman; P Kostenuik; B P Halloran
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1998-07

9.  Forces associated with launch into space do not impact bone fracture healing.

Authors:  Paul Childress; Alexander Brinker; Cynthia-May S Gong; Jonathan Harris; David J Olivos; Jeffrey D Rytlewski; David C Scofield; Sungshin Y Choi; Yasaman Shirazi-Fard; Todd O McKinley; Tien-Min G Chu; Carolynn L Conley; Nabarun Chakraborty; Rasha Hammamieh; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2017-11-11

10.  Effects of housing density in five inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Judith L Morgan; Karen L Svenson; Jeffrey P Lake; Weidong Zhang; Timothy M Stearns; Michael A Marion; Luanne L Peters; Beverly Paigen; Leah Rae Donahue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive review of mouse diaphyseal femur fracture models.

Authors:  Zachary J Gunderson; Zachery R Campbell; Todd O McKinley; Roman M Natoli; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Improving Post-Operative Outcomes in Aged and Diabetic Obese Mice.

Authors:  Keely Szilagyi; Michael A Zieger; Jiliang Li; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Lab Animal Sci Prof       Date:  2018-09

3.  Analysis of the effects of spaceflight and local administration of thrombopoietin to a femoral defect injury on distal skeletal sites.

Authors:  Ariane Zamarioli; Zachery R Campbell; Kevin A Maupin; Paul J Childress; Joao P B Ximenez; Gremah Adam; Nabarun Chakraborty; Aarti Gautam; Rasha Hammamieh; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.415

4.  Reciprocal Homer1a and Homer2 Isoform Expression Is a Key Mechanism for Muscle Soleus Atrophy in Spaceflown Mice.

Authors:  Dieter Blottner; Gabor Trautmann; Sandra Furlan; Guido Gambara; Katharina Block; Martina Gutsmann; Lian-Wen Sun; Paul F Worley; Luisa Gorza; Martina Scano; Paola Lorenzon; Imre Vida; Pompeo Volpe; Michele Salanova
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Systemic effects of BMP2 treatment of fractures on non-injured skeletal sites during spaceflight.

Authors:  Ariane Zamarioli; Gremah Adam; Kevin A Maupin; Paul J Childress; Alexander Brinker; Joao P B Ximenez; Nabarun Chakraborty; Aarti Gautam; Rasha Hammamieh; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.055

6.  Skeletal adaptations in young male mice after 4 weeks aboard the International Space Station.

Authors:  Kevin A Maupin; Paul Childress; Alexander Brinker; Faisal Khan; Irushi Abeysekera; Izath Nizeet Aguilar; David J Olivos; Gremah Adam; Michael K Savaglio; Venkateswaran Ganesh; Riley Gorden; Rachel Mannfeld; Elliott Beckner; Daniel J Horan; Alexander G Robling; Nabarun Chakraborty; Aarti Gautam; Rasha Hammamieh; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.415

7.  The effects of spaceflight and fracture healing on distant skeletal sites.

Authors:  Ushashi C Dadwal; Kevin A Maupin; Ariane Zamarioli; Aamir Tucker; Jonathan S Harris; James P Fischer; Jeffery D Rytlewski; David C Scofield; Austin E Wininger; Fazal Ur Rehman Bhatti; Marta Alvarez; Paul J Childress; Nabarun Chakraborty; Aarti Gautam; Rasha Hammamieh; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.