| Literature DB >> 29753325 |
Wei Xia1,2, Duo Zhang1,2, Jing Ouyang1,2, Yan Liang1,2, Huiyu Zhang1,2, Zhen Huang1,2, Guiling Liang1,2, Qian Zhu1,2, Xiaoming Guan3, Jian Zhang4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pelvic endometriosis (EM) and adenomyosis (AM) have different effects on the fallopian tube. This study aimed to assess the transport capability of the fallopian tube in women with pelvic EM or AM.Entities:
Keywords: Adenomyosis; Ciliary beat frequency (CBF); Endometriosis; Muscular contraction; Percentage of ciliated cells
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29753325 PMCID: PMC5948789 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-018-0361-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Characteristics of the recruited patients
| Variables | Control group ( | AM group ( | EM group ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agea (year) | 47.2 ± 4.8 | 44.4 ± 5.2 | 43.4 ± 5.1 |
| BMIa (kg/m2) | 23.8 ± 2.2 | 21.0 ± 1.9 | 21.8 ± 2.3 |
| Gravidity(n) | 1.9 ± 1.4 | 1.8 ± 1.5 | 1.25 ± 0.9 |
| Parity (n) | 1.1 ± 0.9 | 0.9 ± 0.7 | 1.0 ± 0.5 |
| Baseline of dysmenorrhea VAS scorea | 1.7 ± 1.6c | 5.9 ± 2.7 | 5.7 ± 2.6 |
| Baseline of MVJ scoreb | 4.8 ± 0.9 | 4.7 ± 0.9 | 4.2 ± 1.0 |
Data are mean ± standard deviation (SD)
AM adenomyosis, EM endometriosis
aThe degree of baseline pain was evaluated by the pre-surgical visual analogue scale (VAS) score (0–10 indicates no pain to severe pain)
bBaseline menstrual blood loss was assessed using the pre-surgical Mansfield-Voda-Jorgensen (MVJ) score, ranging from 1 (spotting) to 6 (gushing)
cSignificant difference compared with the AM and EM groups (both p < 0.001)
Fig. 1Ciliary beat frequency (CBF). Data are mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 2Percentage of ciliated cells. Data are mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 3Histological analysis of human fallopian tubes. Light microscopy images showing that the non-tubal EM (tubal endometriosis) and tubal EM subgroups had less ciliated cells. Arrows indicate ciliated cells
Fig. 4Amplitude/Weight ratio of the tubal smooth muscle spontaneous contraction. Data are mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 5Frequency of the tubal smooth muscle spontaneous contraction. Data are mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001