Literature DB >> 29753053

Health warnings promote healthier dietary decision making: Effects of positive versus negative message framing and graphic versus text-based warnings.

Daniel H Rosenblatt1, Stefan Bode2, Helen Dixon3, Carsten Murawski4, Patrick Summerell5, Alyssa Ng6, Melanie Wakefield7.   

Abstract

Food product health warnings have been proposed as a potential obesity prevention strategy. This study examined the effects of text-only and text-and-graphic, negatively and positively framed health warnings on dietary choice behavior. In a 2 × 5 mixed experimental design, 96 participants completed a dietary self-control task. After providing health and taste ratings of snack foods, participants completed a baseline measure of dietary self-control, operationalized as participants' frequency of choosing healthy but not tasty items and rejecting unhealthy yet tasty items to consume at the end of the experiment. Participants were then randomly assigned to one of five health warning groups and presented with 10 health warnings of a given form: text-based, negative framing; graphic, negative framing; text, positive framing; graphic, positive framing; or a no warning control. Participants then completed a second dietary decision making session to determine whether health warnings influenced dietary self-control. Linear mixed effects modeling revealed a significant interaction between health warning group and decision stage (pre- and post-health warning presentation) on dietary self-control. Negatively framed graphic health warnings promoted greater dietary self-control than other health warnings. Negatively framed text health warnings and positively framed graphic health warnings promoted greater dietary self-control than positively framed text health warnings and control images, which did not increase dietary self-control. Overall, HWs primed healthier dietary decision making behavior, with negatively framed graphic HWs being most effective. Health warnings have potential to become an important element of obesity prevention.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dietary decision making; Health warnings; Message framing; Priming; Self-control

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29753053     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  13 in total

1.  Food product health warnings promote dietary self-control through reductions in neural signals indexing food cue reactivity.

Authors:  Daniel H Rosenblatt; Patrick Summerell; Alyssa Ng; Helen Dixon; Carsten Murawski; Melanie Wakefield; Stefan Bode
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.881

2.  Dorsolateral and medial prefrontal cortex mediate the influence of incidental priming on economic decision making in obesity.

Authors:  Filip Morys; Stefan Bode; Annette Horstmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Are Australians ready for warning labels, marketing bans and sugary drink taxes? Two cross-sectional surveys measuring support for policy responses to sugar-sweetened beverages.

Authors:  Caroline L Miller; Joanne Dono; Melanie A Wakefield; Simone Pettigrew; John Coveney; David Roder; Sarah J Durkin; Gary Wittert; Jane Martin; Kerry A Ettridge
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Potential unintended consequences of graphic warning labels on sugary drinks: do they promote obesity stigma?

Authors:  L E Hayward; L R Vartanian
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2019-08-02

5.  Awareness of product-related information, health messages and warnings on alcohol packaging among adolescents: a cross-sectional survey in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Nathan Critchlow; Daniel Jones; Crawford Moodie; Anne Marie MacKintosh; Niamh Fitzgerald; Lucie Hooper; Christopher Thomas; Jyotsna Vohra
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.341

6.  Impact of health warning labels on snack selection: An online experimental study.

Authors:  Natasha Clarke; Emily Pechey; Eleni Mantzari; Anna K M Blackwell; Katie De-Loyde; Richard W Morris; Marcus R Munafò; Theresa M Marteau; Gareth J Hollands
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Signs of Warning: Do Health Warning Messages on Sweets Affect the Neural Prefrontal Cortex Activity?

Authors:  Clara Mehlhose; Antje Risius
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Effects of pairing health warning labels with energy-dense snack foods on food choice and attitudes: Online experimental study.

Authors:  Stephanie C M Asbridge; Emily Pechey; Theresa M Marteau; Gareth J Hollands
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 9.  Internet Search Results for Older Adult Physical Activity Guidelines: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Samantha M Harden; Anna Murphy; Kathryn Ratliff; Laura E Balis
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-01-13

10.  Incidental exposure to hedonic and healthy food features affects food preferences one day later.

Authors:  Léo Dutriaux; Esther K Papies; Jennifer Fallon; Leonel Garcia-Marques; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.