Literature DB >> 29752496

What are the Conditions of Riparian Ecosystems? Identifying Impaired Floodplain Ecosystems across the Western U.S. Using the Riparian Condition Assessment (RCA) Tool.

William W Macfarlane1, Jordan T Gilbert2, Joshua D Gilbert2, William C Saunders2,3, Nate Hough-Snee4, Chalese Hafen2, Joseph M Wheaton2,5, Stephen N Bennett2,3,5.   

Abstract

Environmental stressors associated with human land and water-use activities have degraded many riparian ecosystems across the western United States. These stressors include (i) the widespread expansion of invasive plant species that displace native vegetation and exacerbate streamflow and sediment regime alteration; (ii) agricultural and urban development in valley bottoms that decouple streams and rivers from their floodplains and reduce instream wood recruitment and retention; and (iii) flow modification that reduces water quantity and quality, degrading aquatic habitats. Here we apply a novel drainage network model to assess the impacts of multiple stressors on reach-scale riparian condition across two large U.S. regions. In this application, we performed a riparian condition assessment evaluating three dominant stressors: (1) riparian vegetation departure from historical condition; (2) land-use intensity within valley bottoms; and (3) floodplain fragmentation caused by infrastructure within valley bottoms, combining these stressors in a fuzzy inference system. We used freely available, geospatial data to estimate reach-scale (500 m) riparian condition for 52,800 km of perennial streams and rivers, 25,600 km in Utah, and 27,200 km in 12 watersheds of the interior Columbia River Basin (CRB). Model outputs showed that riparian condition has been at least moderately impaired across ≈70% of the streams and rivers in Utah and ≈49% in the CRB. We found 84% agreement (Cohen's ĸ = 0.79) between modeled reaches and field plots, indicating that modeled riparian condition reasonably approximates on-the-ground conditions. Our approach to assessing riparian condition can be used to prioritize watershed-scale floodplain conservation and restoration by providing network-scale data on the extent and severity of riparian degradation. The approach that we applied here is flexible and can be expanded to run with additional riparian stressor data and/or finer resolution input data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Columbia River Basin; Conservation planning; Floodplain ecology; Riparian degradation; Riparian restoration; Utah; Watershed condition assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29752496     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1061-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  11 in total

Review 1.  Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management.

Authors:  Veronique Adriaenssens; Bernard De Baets; Peter L M Goethals; Niels De Pauw
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Impacts of livestock grazing and tree clearing on birds of woodland and riparian habitats.

Authors:  Tara G Martin; S McIntyre
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Influence of landscape elements in riparian buffers on the conservation of semiaquatic amphibians.

Authors:  Gentile Francesco Ficetola; Emilio Padoa-Schioppa; Fiorenza De Bernardi
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Land use. Sustainable floodplains through large-scale reconnection to rivers.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Opperman; Gerald E Galloway; Joseph Fargione; Jeffrey F Mount; Brian D Richter; Silvia Secchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Building spectral libraries for wetlands land cover classification and hyperspectral remote sensing.

Authors:  R J Zomer; A Trabucco; S L Ustin
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 6.  Global consequences of land use.

Authors:  Jonathan A Foley; Ruth Defries; Gregory P Asner; Carol Barford; Gordon Bonan; Stephen R Carpenter; F Stuart Chapin; Michael T Coe; Gretchen C Daily; Holly K Gibbs; Joseph H Helkowski; Tracey Holloway; Erica A Howard; Christopher J Kucharik; Chad Monfreda; Jonathan A Patz; I Colin Prentice; Navin Ramankutty; Peter K Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Water Quality Functions of Riparian Forest Buffers in Chesapeake Bay Watersheds

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 9.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.

Authors:  David Dudgeon; Angela H Arthington; Mark O Gessner; Zen-Ichiro Kawabata; Duncan J Knowler; Christian Lévêque; Robert J Naiman; Anne-Hélène Prieur-Richard; Doris Soto; Melanie L J Stiassny; Caroline A Sullivan
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-12-12

10.  The Blurred Line between Form and Process: A Comparison of Stream Channel Classification Frameworks.

Authors:  Alan Kasprak; Nate Hough-Snee; Tim Beechie; Nicolaas Bouwes; Gary Brierley; Reid Camp; Kirstie Fryirs; Hiroo Imaki; Martha Jensen; Gary O'Brien; David Rosgen; Joseph Wheaton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and rivers, Part 1: Geoclimatic controls and anthropogenic alteration.

Authors:  Philip R Kaufmann; Robert M Hughes; Steven G Paulsen; David V Peck; Curt W Seeliger; Marc H Weber; Richard M Mitchell
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.263

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.