Literature DB >> 18983602

Influence of landscape elements in riparian buffers on the conservation of semiaquatic amphibians.

Gentile Francesco Ficetola1, Emilio Padoa-Schioppa, Fiorenza De Bernardi.   

Abstract

Studies on riparian buffers have usually focused on the amount of land needed as habitat for the terrestrial life stages of semiaquatic species. Nevertheless, the landscape surrounding wetlands is also important for other key processes, such as dispersal and the dynamics of metapopulations. Multiple elements that influence these processes should therefore be considered in the delineation of buffers. We analyzed landscape elements (forest cover, density of roads, and hydrographic network) in concentric buffers to evaluate the scale at which they influence stream amphibians in 77 distinct landscapes. To evaluate whether our results could be generalized to other contexts, we determined whether they were consistent across the study areas. Amphibians required buffers of 100-400 m of suitable terrestrial habitat, but interspecific differences in the amount of habitat were large. The presence of amphibians was related to roads and the hydrographic network at larger spatial scales (300-1500 m), which suggests that wider buffers are needed with these elements. This pattern probably arose because these elements influence dispersal and metapopulation persistence, processes that occur at large spatial scales. Furthermore, in some cases, analyses performed on different sets of landscapes provided different results, which suggests caution should be used when conservation recommendations are applied to disparate areas. Establishment of riparian buffers should not be focused only on riparian habitat, but should take a landscape perspective because semiaquatic species use multiple elements for different functions. This approach can be complex because different landscape elements require different spatial extents. Nevertheless, a shift of attention toward the management of different elements at multiple spatial scales is necessary for the long-term persistence of populations.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18983602     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01081.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  7 in total

1.  Importance of riparian remnants for frog species diversity in a highly fragmented rainforest.

Authors:  Clara Rodríguez-Mendoza; Eduardo Pineda
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Environmental determinants of the old oaks in wood-pastures from a changing traditional social-ecological system of Romania.

Authors:  Cosmin Ioan Moga; Ciprian Samoilă; Kinga Öllerer; Raluca I Băncilă; Kinga-Olga Réti; Cristina Craioveanu; Szilárd Poszet; László Rákosy; Tibor Hartel
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  What are the Conditions of Riparian Ecosystems? Identifying Impaired Floodplain Ecosystems across the Western U.S. Using the Riparian Condition Assessment (RCA) Tool.

Authors:  William W Macfarlane; Jordan T Gilbert; Joshua D Gilbert; William C Saunders; Nate Hough-Snee; Chalese Hafen; Joseph M Wheaton; Stephen N Bennett
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Local-scale Seasonality Shapes Anuran Community Abundance in a Cloud Forest of the Tropical Andes.

Authors:  Pedro M Villa; Antonio J Pérez-Sánchez; Francisco Nava; Aldemar Acevedo; Diego A Cadenas
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Similar local and landscape processes affect both a common and a rare newt species.

Authors:  Mathieu Denoël; Amélie Perez; Yves Cornet; Gentile Francesco Ficetola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Human traffic and habitat complexity are strong predictors for the distribution of a declining amphibian.

Authors:  Rachel B Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Despite Buffers, Experimental Forest Clearcuts Impact Amphibian Body Size and Biomass.

Authors:  Jessica S Veysey Powell; Kimberly J Babbitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.