| Literature DB >> 29751799 |
Stephanie Everaerts1, Elise J Lammertyn2, Dries S Martens3, Laurens J De Sadeleer2, Karen Maes2, Aernoud A van Batenburg4, Roel Goldschmeding5, Coline H M van Moorsel4,6, Lieven J Dupont2,7, Wim A Wuyts2,7, Robin Vos2,7, Ghislaine Gayan-Ramirez2, Naftali Kaminski8, James C Hogg9, Wim Janssens2,7, Geert M Verleden2,7, Tim S Nawrot3,10, Stijn E Verleden2, John E McDonough2, Bart M Vanaudenaerde2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Telomere shortening has been associated with several lung diseases. However, telomere length is generally measured in peripheral blood leucocytes rather than in lung tissue, where disease occurs. Consequently, telomere dynamics have not been established for the normal human lung nor for diseased lung tissue. We hypothesized an age- and disease-dependent shortening of lung tissue telomeres.Entities:
Keywords: BOS; Cellular senescence; Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis; Chronic lung allograft dysfunction; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Cystic fibrosis; RAS; Telomere length
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29751799 PMCID: PMC5948770 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-018-0794-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Demographic and clinical characteristics of lungs
| NORMAL | CF | COPD | cHP | BOS | RAS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects, n | 13 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 14 |
| Lung age, years | 48 (20) | 23 (7)* | 60 (3) | 58 (10) | 27 (24) | 46 (23) |
| Lung age, range | 16-72 | 19-33 | 48-61 | 36-61 | 16-48 | 9-61 |
| Male, n (%) | 10 (77) | 5 (42) | 5 (45) | 4 (44) | 5 (45) | 8 (57) |
| Male donor, n (%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | 5 (45) | 8 (57) |
| Patient height, cm | 175 (15) | 162 (18) | 163 (22) | 166 (19) | 168 (12) | 168 (17) |
| Patient weight, kg | 80 (25) | 46 (14)*** | 60 (17) | 74 (9) | 51 (21)** | 60 (21)* |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25 (4) | 18 (2)*** | 21 (8) | 27 (4) | 18 (5)** | 19 (6)** |
| FEV1, L | NA | 0.8 (0.4) | 0.8 (0.5) | 1.1 (0.8) | 0.6 (0.3) | 0.9 (0.5) |
| FEV1, % predicted | NA | 23 (10) | 31 (11) | 49 (21) | 20 (3) | 26 (12) |
| FVC, L | NA | 1.6 (0.8) | 2.0 (0.4) | 1.3 (0.9) | 1.5 (1) | 1.4 (0.6) |
| FVC, % predicted | NA | 45 (15) | 66 (33) | 38 (20) | 46 (20) | 33 (13) |
| FEV1/FVC | NA | 0.5 (0.1) | 0.4 (0.1) | 0.9 (0.2) | 0.4 (0.1) | 0.7 (0.3) |
| DLco, % predicted | NA | 38 (33)a | 33 (14) | 30 (7) | 40 (18)b | 35 (8)c |
a, b, c respectively 6, 1 and 7 missing values. Results are given as n (%) or median (IQR). % predicted of FEV1 and FVC was based on ECSC equations before 2012 [45] and on GLI equations from 2012 onwards [46]. ATS recommendations were used for equations of DLCO reference [47]. Significant difference with the normal lungs is indicated with *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001
CF cystic fibrosis, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cHP chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, BOS bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, RAS restrictive allograft syndrome, NA not applicable, BMI body mass index, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC forced vital capacity, FEV1/FVC tiffeneau index, DLco diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide
Relation between RTL and lung age in normal and diseased lung tissue
| Group | Estimate | % change | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NORMAL | −0.0039 | −0.90 | −1.26 - -0.54 |
|
| CF | −0.0045 | −1.04 | −2.21 - 0.16 | 0.090 |
| COPD | 0.015 | 3.41 | 1.36 - 5.49 |
|
| cHP | −0.0024 | − 0.55 | −4.98 - 4.10 | 0.81 |
| BOS | −0.0033 | −0.76 | −1.41 - -1.41 |
|
| RAS | −0.0021 | −0.47 | − 0.88 - -0.06 |
|
Mixed linear models were used to measure the association between tissue RTL and lung age, with the lung as random effect, adjusted for sex and BMI. Estimates are presented as percentage change (95% CI) in average RTL for each 1-year increase in lung age
RTL relative telomere length, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, CF cystic fibrosis, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cHP chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, BOS bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, RAS restrictive allograft syndrome
p-value < 0.05 is captured in bold
Fig. 1RTL decrease with age and regional difference in normal lung tissue. a: log10 RTL versus lung age in normal lungs. Log10 RTL per lung is presented as a boxplot with the grey area representing the 95% confidence interval. b and c: Paired t-test of log10 RTL in normal lungs based on spatial distribution. Every dot shows the mean log10 RTL of cores originating from the respective region per lung. b: difference in log10 RTL between cores originating from the apical (n = 26) and basal (n = 26) lung regions (p = 0.0002). c: difference in log10 RTL between upper (n = 37) and lower lobe (n = 15) cores (p = 0.0015)
Coefficients of variation (%) for RTL between and within lungs
| NORMAL | CF | COPD | cHP | BOS | RAS | Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV between lungs for each group, % | 18.3 | 12.5 | 17.6 | 30 | 22.4 | 18.0 | 19.8 |
| Mean CV within lung, % | 16.3 | 11.2 | 17.3 | 15.2 | 11.9 | 12.4 | 14.1 |
Results are presented as percentages. Coefficients of variation were calculated per disease group (based on mean lung RTL values) and per lung (based on core RTL values)
RTL relative telomere length, CV coefficient of variation, CF cystic fibrosis, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cHP chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, BOS bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, RAS restrictive allograft syndrome
Fig. 2Association of age and telomere length in AT2 cells of normal lung tissue by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Telomere length determination by FISH on normal lung tissue of (a) a 19-year old and (b) an 83-year old donor showed (c) significantly higher telomere length in AT2 cells of the youngest subject (p = 0.009). The fluorecent labelling in the a and b panel stands for green: proSPC (AT2 cells), red: telomere probe, blue: DAPI. Data are presented as boxplots and every dot represents one cell
Comparison between RTL in diseased and normal lungs, adjusted for lung age, BMI and sex
| Comparison | Estimate | % change | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF vs normal | 0.0090 | 2.09 | −9.20 - 14.77 | 0.73 |
| COPD vs normal | 0.032 | 7.67 | −2.93 – 19.44 | 0.16 |
| cHP vs normal | −0.14 | −27.97 | −34.63 - -20.64 |
|
| BOS vs normal | −0.069 | −14.62 | −23.53 - -4.69 |
|
| RAS vs normal | −0.048 | −10.43 | −18.91 - -1.06 |
|
Multivariate mixed linear model comparing diseased lungs with normal lungs with lung as random effect, adjusted for lung age, BMI and sex. Estimates are presented as percentage change (95% CI) in average RTL per group compared to normal lungs
RTL relative telomere length, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, CF cystic fibrosis, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cHP chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, BOS bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, RAS restrictive allograft syndrome, vs versus
p-value < 0.05 is captured in bold
Fig. 3Relation between RTL and age in lung disease. Log10 RTL per lung is presented as a boxplot. The grey area in each graph represents the 95% confidence interval of log10 RTL in normal lungs. a: log10 RTL versus lung age in CF lungs. b: log10 RTL versus lung age in COPD lungs. c: log10 RTL versus lung age in cHP lungs. d: log10 RTL versus lung age in BOS lungs. e: log10 RTL versus lung age in RAS lungs
Fig. 4Lack of association between RTL and local disease severity. Every dot represents an individual core log10 RTL. Horizontal lines represent means. a: RTL in normal versus abnormal CF lung tissue (both n = 24), stratified based on HRCT of the lung (p = 0.96). b: RTL in mildly versus severely affected cHP lung tissue (both n = 18), stratified based on surface density of core micro CT (p = 0.22). c: RTL in mildly versus severely affected RAS lung tissue (both n = 28), stratified based on surface density of core micro CT (p = 0.084)