Peter Bede1,2,3, Giorgia Querin3, Pierre-François Pradat2,3. 1. Computational Neuroimaging Group, Academic Unit of Neurology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. 2. Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital. 3. Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne University, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neuroimaging in motor neuron disease (MND) has traditionally been seen as an academic tool with limited direct relevance to individualized patient care. This has changed radically in recent years as computational imaging has emerged as a viable clinical tool with true biomarker potential. This transition is not only fuelled by technological advances but also by important conceptual developments. RECENT FINDINGS: The natural history of MND is now evaluated by presymptomatic, postmortem and multi-timepoint longitudinal imaging studies. The anatomical spectrum of MND imaging has also been expanded from an overwhelmingly cerebral focus to innovative spinal and muscle applications. In contrast to the group-comparisons of previous studies, machine-learning and deep-learning approaches are increasingly utilized to model real-life diagnostic dilemmas and aid prognostic classification. The focus from evaluating focal structural changes has shifted to the appraisal of network integrity by connectivity-based approaches. The armamentarium of MND imaging has also been complemented by novel PET-ligands, spinal toolboxes and the availability of magnetoencephalography and high-field magnetic resonance (MR) imaging platforms. SUMMARY: In addition to the technological and conceptual advances, collaborative multicentre research efforts have also gained considerable momentum. This opinion-piece reviews emerging trends in MND imaging and their implications to clinical care and drug development.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neuroimaging in motor neuron disease (MND) has traditionally been seen as an academic tool with limited direct relevance to individualized patient care. This has changed radically in recent years as computational imaging has emerged as a viable clinical tool with true biomarker potential. This transition is not only fuelled by technological advances but also by important conceptual developments. RECENT FINDINGS: The natural history of MND is now evaluated by presymptomatic, postmortem and multi-timepoint longitudinal imaging studies. The anatomical spectrum of MND imaging has also been expanded from an overwhelmingly cerebral focus to innovative spinal and muscle applications. In contrast to the group-comparisons of previous studies, machine-learning and deep-learning approaches are increasingly utilized to model real-life diagnostic dilemmas and aid prognostic classification. The focus from evaluating focal structural changes has shifted to the appraisal of network integrity by connectivity-based approaches. The armamentarium of MND imaging has also been complemented by novel PET-ligands, spinal toolboxes and the availability of magnetoencephalography and high-field magnetic resonance (MR) imaging platforms. SUMMARY: In addition to the technological and conceptual advances, collaborative multicentre research efforts have also gained considerable momentum. This opinion-piece reviews emerging trends in MND imaging and their implications to clinical care and drug development.
Authors: Stacey Li Hi Shing; Mary Clare McKenna; We Fong Siah; Rangariroyashe H Chipika; Orla Hardiman; Peter Bede Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Eoin Finegan; Stacey Li Hi Shing; Rangariroyashe H Chipika; Kai Ming Chang; Mary Clare McKenna; Mark A Doherty; Jennifer C Hengeveld; Alice Vajda; Niall Pender; Colette Donaghy; Siobhan Hutchinson; Russell L McLaughlin; Orla Hardiman; Peter Bede Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Rangariroyashe H Chipika; We Fong Siah; Mary Clare McKenna; Stacey Li Hi Shing; Orla Hardiman; Peter Bede Journal: J Neurol Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 6.682
Authors: Elena Ratti; Kimiko Domoto-Reilly; Christina Caso; Alyssa Murphy; Michael Brickhouse; Daisy Hochberg; Nikos Makris; Merit E Cudkowicz; Bradford C Dickerson Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 3.224
Authors: Eoin Finegan; Rangariroyashe H Chipika; Stacey Li Hi Shing; Mark A Doherty; Jennifer C Hengeveld; Alice Vajda; Colette Donaghy; Russell L McLaughlin; Niall Pender; Orla Hardiman; Peter Bede Journal: J Neurol Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 4.849