Marlene Tahedl1,2,3, Rangariroyashe H Chipika1, Jasmin Lope1, Stacey Li Hi Shing1, Orla Hardiman1, Peter Bede4. 1. Computational Neuroimaging Group, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, 152-160 Pearse Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. 3. Institute for Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. 4. Computational Neuroimaging Group, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, 152-160 Pearse Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. bedep@tcd.ie.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The majority of imaging studies in ALS infer group-level imaging signatures from group comparisons, as opposed to estimating disease burden in individual patients. In a condition with considerable clinical heterogeneity, the characterisation of individual patterns of pathology is hugely relevant. In this study, we evaluate a strategy to track progressive cortical involvement in single patients by using subject-specific reference cohorts. METHODS: We have interrogated a multi-timepoint longitudinal dataset of 61 ALS patients to demonstrate the utility of estimating cortical disease burden and the expansion of cerebral atrophy over time. We contrast our strategy to the gold-standard approach to gauge the advantages and drawbacks of our method. We modelled the evolution of cortical integrity in a conditional growth model, in which we accounted for age, gender, disability, symptom duration, education and handedness. We hypothesised that the variance associated with demographic variables will be successfully eliminated in our approach. RESULTS: In our model, the only covariate which modulated the expansion of atrophy was motor disability as measured by the ALSFRS-r (t(153) = - 2.533, p = 0.0123). Using the standard approach, age also significantly influenced progression of CT change (t(153) = - 2.151, p = 0.033) demonstrating the validity and potential clinical utility of our approach. CONCLUSION: Our strategy of estimating the extent of cortical atrophy in individual patients with ALS successfully corrects for demographic factors and captures relevant cortical changes associated with clinical disability. Our approach provides a framework to interpret single T1-weighted images in ALS and offers an opportunity to track cortical propagation patterns both at individual subject level and at cohort level.
INTRODUCTION: The majority of imaging studies in ALS infer group-level imaging signatures from group comparisons, as opposed to estimating disease burden in individual patients. In a condition with considerable clinical heterogeneity, the characterisation of individual patterns of pathology is hugely relevant. In this study, we evaluate a strategy to track progressive cortical involvement in single patients by using subject-specific reference cohorts. METHODS: We have interrogated a multi-timepoint longitudinal dataset of 61 ALS patients to demonstrate the utility of estimating cortical disease burden and the expansion of cerebral atrophy over time. We contrast our strategy to the gold-standard approach to gauge the advantages and drawbacks of our method. We modelled the evolution of cortical integrity in a conditional growth model, in which we accounted for age, gender, disability, symptom duration, education and handedness. We hypothesised that the variance associated with demographic variables will be successfully eliminated in our approach. RESULTS: In our model, the only covariate which modulated the expansion of atrophy was motor disability as measured by the ALSFRS-r (t(153) = - 2.533, p = 0.0123). Using the standard approach, age also significantly influenced progression of CT change (t(153) = - 2.151, p = 0.033) demonstrating the validity and potential clinical utility of our approach. CONCLUSION: Our strategy of estimating the extent of cortical atrophy in individual patients with ALS successfully corrects for demographic factors and captures relevant cortical changes associated with clinical disability. Our approach provides a framework to interpret single T1-weighted images in ALS and offers an opportunity to track cortical propagation patterns both at individual subject level and at cohort level.
Authors: Hélène Blasco; Franck Patin; Amandine Descat; Guillaume Garçon; Philippe Corcia; Patrick Gelé; Timothée Lenglet; Peter Bede; Vincent Meininger; David Devos; Jean François Gossens; Pierre-François Pradat Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: David Devos; Caroline Moreau; Maeva Kyheng; Guillaume Garçon; Anne Sophie Rolland; Hélène Blasco; Patrick Gelé; T Timothée Lenglet; C Veyrat-Durebex; Philippe Corcia; Mary Dutheil; Peter Bede; Andreas Jeromin; Patrick Oeckl; Markus Otto; Vincent Meininger; Véronique Danel-Brunaud; Jean-Christophe Devedjian; James A Duce; Pierre François Pradat Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Timothy Miller; Merit Cudkowicz; Pamela J Shaw; Peter M Andersen; Nazem Atassi; Robert C Bucelli; Angela Genge; Jonathan Glass; Shafeeq Ladha; Albert L Ludolph; Nicholas J Maragakis; Christopher J McDermott; Alan Pestronk; John Ravits; François Salachas; Randall Trudell; Philip Van Damme; Lorne Zinman; C Frank Bennett; Roger Lane; Alfred Sandrock; Heiko Runz; Danielle Graham; Hani Houshyar; Alexander McCampbell; Ivan Nestorov; Ih Chang; Manjit McNeill; Laura Fanning; Stephanie Fradette; Toby A Ferguson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mary Clare McKenna; Rangariroyashe H Chipika; Stacey Li Hi Shing; Foteini Christidi; Jasmin Lope; Mark A Doherty; Jennifer C Hengeveld; Alice Vajda; Russell L McLaughlin; Orla Hardiman; Siobhan Hutchinson; Peter Bede Journal: J Neurol Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 6.682
Authors: Mary Clare McKenna; Marlene Tahedl; Jasmin Lope; Rangariroyashe H Chipika; Stacey Li Hi Shing; Mark A Doherty; Jennifer C Hengeveld; Alice Vajda; Russell L McLaughlin; Orla Hardiman; Siobhan Hutchinson; Peter Bede Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-12-09 Impact factor: 3.224
Authors: Hans-Peter Müller; Anna Behler; G Bernhard Landwehrmeyer; Hans-Jürgen Huppertz; Jan Kassubek Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 4.677