| Literature DB >> 29750656 |
Michelle Heacock1, Brittany Trottier1, Sharad Adhikary2, Kwadwo Ansong Asante3, Nil Basu4, Marie-Noel Brune5, Jack Caravanos6, David Carpenter7, Danielle Cazabon8, Paromita Chakraborty9, Aimin Chen10, Fernando Diaz Barriga11, Bret Ericson12, Julius Fobil13, Budi Haryanto14, Xia Huo15, T K Joshi16, Philip Landrigan17, Adeline Lopez18, Frederico Magalini19, Panida Navasumrit20, Antonio Pascale21, Sankar Sambandam22, Upik Sitti Aslia Kamil23, Leith Sly24, Peter Sly24, Ann Suk25, Inoka Suraweera26, Ridwan Tamin27, Elena Vicario28, William Suk1.
Abstract
As one of the largest waste streams, electronic waste (e-waste) production continues to grow in response to global demand for consumer electronics. This waste is often shipped to developing countries where it is disassembled and recycled. In many cases, e-waste recycling activities are conducted in informal settings with very few controls or protections in place for workers. These activities involve exposure to hazardous substances such as cadmium, lead, and brominated flame retardants and are frequently performed by women and children. Although recycling practices and exposures vary by scale and geographic region, we present case studies of e-waste recycling scenarios and intervention approaches to reduce or prevent exposures to the hazardous substances in e-waste that may be broadly applicable to diverse situations. Drawing on parallels identified in these cases, we discuss the future prevention and intervention strategies that recognize the difficult economic realities of informal e-waste recycling.Entities:
Keywords: electronic recycling; electronic waste (e-waste); environmental health; global health; intervention; prevention
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29750656 DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2018-0014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Environ Health ISSN: 0048-7554 Impact factor: 3.458