| Literature DB >> 29748699 |
Mona Salehi Ravesh1, Carsten Rickers2, Finn Jonathan Bannert2, David Hautemann3, Abdullah Al Bulushi2,4, Dominik Daniel Gabbert2, Philip Wegner2, Eva Kis2,5, Jan Hinnerk Hansen2, Michaeal Jerosch-Herold6, H-H Kramer2, Jana Logoteta2.
Abstract
In hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), long-term outcome is closely related to right ventricular function. Echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are routinely used for functional assessment. MRI 2D-tissue feature tracking (2D-FT) allows quantification of myocardial deformation but has not yet been applied to HLHS patients. We sought to investigate the feasibility of this technique and to compare the results to 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). In routine MRI 2D anatomical four chamber view, cine images were recorded in 55 HLHS patients (median age 4.9 years [1.6, 17.0]). Regional and global peak systolic longitudinal strain (LS) and strain rate (LSR) were determined using 2D-FT software. Echocardiographic four chamber view was analyzed with 2D-STE. Visualization of all myocardial segments with MRI was excellent, regional, and global LS and LSR could be assessed in all data sets. In 2D-STE, 28% of apical segments could not be analyzed due to poor image quality. Agreement of 2D-FT MRI and 2D-STE was acceptable for global LS, but poor for global LSR. In MRI, regional LS was lower in the septal segments, while LSR was not different between the segments. GLS and GLSR correlated with ejection fraction (GLS: r = - 0.45 and r < 0.001, GLSR: r = - 0.34 and p = 0.01). With new post-processing options, the assessment of regional and global LS and LSR is feasible in routine MRI of HLHS patients. For LS, results were comparable with 2D-STE. The agreement was poor for LSR, which might relate to differences in temporal resolution between the two imaging modalities.Entities:
Keywords: Dyssynchrony; Feature tracking MRI; Hypoplastic left heart syndrome; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Right ventricular function; Strain and strain rate
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29748699 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-018-1892-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Cardiol ISSN: 0172-0643 Impact factor: 1.655