| Literature DB >> 29747589 |
Vivien Kurucz1, Thomas Krüger2, Károly Antal3, Anna-Maria Dietl4, Hubertus Haas4, István Pócsi1, Olaf Kniemeyer5, Tamás Emri6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aspergillus fumigatus has to cope with a combination of several stress types while colonizing the human body. A functional interplay between these different stress responses can increase the chances of survival for this opportunistic human pathogen during the invasion of its host. In this study, we shed light on how the H2O2-induced oxidative stress response depends on the iron available to this filamentous fungus, using transcriptomic analysis, proteomic profiles, and growth assays.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus fumigatus; Combinatorial stress; Iron deprivation; Oxidative stress; Proteomics; Stress response; Transcriptomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29747589 PMCID: PMC5946477 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4730-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Principal component analysis of the transcriptome data. Symbols represent +Fe/-H2O2 (○), +Fe/+H2O2 (●), -Fe/-H2O2 (□) and -Fe/+H2O2 (■) cultures
Basic statistics of the transcriptome data
| Sample | Total reads (106) | Mapped reads (106) | Mapped ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| +Fe/-H2O2 1 | 19.0 | 18.3 | 96.0 |
| +Fe/-H2O2 2 | 15.3 | 14.7 | 95.5 |
| +Fe/-H2O2 3 | 14.8 | 14.2 | 96.0 |
| Sum: | 49.2 | 47.2 | 95.9 |
| + Fe/+H2O2 1 | 18.8 | 17.9 | 95.5 |
| + Fe/+H2O2 2 | 17.1 | 16.3 | 95.7 |
| + Fe/+H2O2 3 | 14.6 | 14.0 | 95.8 |
| Sum: | 50.5 | 48.3 | 95.7 |
| -Fe/-H2O2 1 | 15.0 | 14.4 | 95.9 |
| -Fe/-H2O2 2 | 16.3 | 15.6 | 95.5 |
| -Fe/-H2O2 3 | 17.6 | 16.8 | 95.6 |
| Sum: | 48.9 | 46.8 | 95.7 |
| -Fe/+H2O2 1 | 16.4 | 15.8 | 95.8 |
| -Fe/+H2O2 2 | 18.3 | 17.6 | 96.0 |
| -Fe/+H2O2 3 | 16.1 | 15.5 | 96.1 |
| Sum: | 50.9 | 48.9 | 96.0 |
| Total sum: | 199.5 | 191.1 | 95.8 |
Fig. 2Venn-diagrams of the detected changes in the transcriptome and proteome. Graphs indicating the number of up-regulated/down-regulated (a) genes and (b) proteins
Results of the gene enrichment analysis
| Comparison | Up- | Down- | Significant enriched FunCat termsa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| regulated genes | for up regulated genes | for down regulated genes | ||
| -Fe/-H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2 | 1107 | 1383 | secondary metabolism, drug/toxin transport, homeostasis of metal ions, siderophore-iron transport, degradation of aspartate | translation, Fe/S binding, ribosome biogenesis, secondary metabolism, aerobic respiration, detoxification involving cytochrome P450, heme binding, TCA pathway, metabolism of melanins, catalase reaction |
| +Fe/+H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2 | 347 | 339 | secondary metabolism | secondary metabolism, siderophore-iron transport, extracellular polysaccharide degradation, homeostasis of metal ions |
| -Fe/+H2O2 vs. -Fe/-H2O2 | 2125 | 2028 | proteasomal degradation, heat shock response, vacuolar/lysosomal transport, oxidative stress response, DNA repair | ribosome biogenesis, translation, allantoin and allantoate transport, secondary metabolism, vitamin/cofactor transport, fatty acid metabolism, virulence and disease factors, degradation of glutamine |
| -Fe/+H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2 | 2420 | 2344 | vacuolar/lysosomal transport, heat shock response, proteasomal degradation, transcription initiation, vacuole or lysosome, DNA repair | ribosome biogenesis, translation, Fe/S binding, TCA pathway, secondary metabolism, aerobic respiration, detoxification involving cytochrome P450, allantoin and allantoate transport, disease-virulence-defense, heme binding |
aSelected significant (p < 0.05) shared FunCat terms are presented. The full data sets, which also contain the significant shared GO and KEGG pathway terms are available in Additional file 2
Results of the protein enrichment analysis
| Comparison | Up | Down | Significant enriched FunCat termsa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| regulated proteins | for up-regulated proteins | for down-regulated proteins | ||
| -Fe/-H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2 | 122 | 95 | siderophore-iron transport, oxygen and radical detoxification | Fe/S binding, aerobic respiration, translation, ribosome biogenesis, sulfate assimilation, biosynthesis of leucine, unfolded protein response, biosynthesis of homocysteine, TCA pathway |
| +Fe/+H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2 | 17 | 0 | No significant term was found. | No proteins were related to this gene group. |
| -Fe/+H2O2 vs. -Fe/-H2O2 | 3 | 0 | heat shock response, oxidative stress response | No proteins were related to this gene group. |
| -Fe/+H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2 | 108 | 105 | siderophore-iron transport | Fe/S binding, aerobic respiration, translation, ribosome biogenesis, TCA pathway, biosynthesis of glutamate, heme binding, biosynthesis of leucine, biosynthesis of homocysteine |
aSelected significant (p < 0.05) shared FunCat terms are presented. The full data sets, which also contain the significant shared GO and KEGG pathway terms are available in Additional file 2
Fig. 3Correlation between proteome and transcriptome data. Data pairs containing the log2 ratio (log2FC) of the mean FPKM values (in case of the up- or down regulated genes only) and the log2 ratio (log2FC) of the appropriate mean protein abundance values are presented. A - -Fe/-H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2 B - + Fe/+H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2. C - -Fe/+H2O2 vs. -Fe/-H2O2. D - -Fe/+H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2. E - Pairwise Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients calculated from the log2FC values (transcriptome vs. proteome). a - all available transcriptome vs. proteome data pairs. b - transcriptome data of up- or down-regulated genes only vs. proteome data. c - proteome data of up- or down-regulated proteins only vs. transcriptome data. n.c. - We found only three up- or down-regulated proteins, therefore a correlation coefficient was not calculated in this case
Fig. 4DCF production of the –Fe/+H2O2 A. fumigatus cultures. Redox imbalance caused by stress treatment was quantified with the 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate assay. DCF productions were given as produced pmol DCF / mg dry cell mass (DCM). Mean ± S.D. calculated from three independent experiments are presented. The label “vs. a”, “vs. b”, and “vs. c” represent significantly increased DCF production compared to iron-repleted (+Fe), iron-depleted (-Fe), and H2O2-treated iron-replete (+Fe/+H2O2) cultures, respectively, according to Student’s t-test (p < 0.05)
Regulation of selected secondary metabolism biosynthetic gene clusters
| Cluster | Cluster sizea | Related genes (up-regulated/down-regulated) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -Fe/-H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2 | +Fe/+H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2 | -Fe/+H2O2 vs. -Fe/-H2O2 | -Fe/+H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2 | ||
| DHN-melanin cluster | 10 | 1/8b | 1/0 | 3/0 | 2/7b |
| Endocrocin cluster | 9 | 2/4b | 5b/1 | 1/4 | 1/5b |
| Fumagillin cluster | 15 | 8b/0 | 11b/0 | 0/15b | 1/2 |
| Fumigaclavine C (fga) cluster | 11 | 0/5b | 4b/0 | 0/1 | 0/6b |
| Fumipyrrole cluster | 7 | 0/7b | 0/0 | 2/1 | 1/7b |
| Fumiquinazoline cluster | 5 | 0/5b | 1/0 | 1/0 | 0/4b |
| Fumitremorgin B (ftm) cluster | 9 | 0/4b | 0/0 | 0/7b | 0/8b |
| Siderophore cluster | 18 | 10b/5 | 0/10b | 9b/3 | 11b/3 |
| Gliotoxin (gli) cluster | 12 | 0/12b | 2/0 | 4/1 | 0/12b |
| Hexadehydro-astechrome cluster | 8 | 7b/0 | 5b/0 | 1/4 | 3/0 |
| Pseurotin A cluster | 4 | 3b/0 | 4b/0 | 0/4b | 0/1 |
| Afu1g01010 cluster | 4 | 2/0 | 1/0 | 0/4b | 0/1 |
| Afu3g01410 cluster | 9 | 2/0 | 2b/0 | 3/4 | 2/3 |
| Afu3g02570 and Afu3g02530 clusters | 15 | 4/3 | 0/2 | 7b/0 | 6/2 |
| Afu3g02670 cluster | 7 | 3b/0 | 0/1 | 1/2 | 3/0 |
| Afu3g13730 cluster | 9 | 0/5b | 0/4b | 0/1 | 0/5b |
| Afu5g10120 cluster | 10 | 3/0 | 1/0 | 2/0 | 6b/0 |
| Afu6g13930 cluster | 9 | 0/9b | 0/2b | 1/5b | 0/9b |
| Afu7g00170 cluster | 7 | 1/1 | 4b/0 | 1/0 | 1/0 |
| No PKS or NRPS backbone 6 cluster | 13 | 1/5b | 0/2 | 3/1 | 3/5 |
| Number of up-regulated clusters | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | |
| Number of down-regulated clusters | 10 | 3 | 5 | 9 | |
aNumber of genes belonging to the cluster. The full data sets are available in Additional file 4
bSignificantly enriched gene group according to the Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.05)
Fig. 5Comparison of oxidative stress response in iron-replete (+Fe/+H2O2 vs. +Fe/-H2O2) and iron-depleted cultures (-Fe/+H2O2 vs. -Fe/-H2O2). Percentages of stress responsive genes (differentially expressed genes with at least two-fold transcriptional difference) detected only in iron-depleted cultures (yellow), only in iron-replete cultures (blue), in both cultures with unidirectional transcriptional changes (pink), and in both cultures with opposite transcriptional changes (red) are presented
Fig. 6The impact of iron supply on oxidative stress resistance of A. fumigatus. A. fumigatus wild type and ΔsidA strains were point-inoculated on minimal medium plates reflecting different iron supply with and without stressors leading to oxidative stress (H2O2 and the redox cyclers paraquat and menadione) or BPS, a ferrous iron-specific chelator, which inactivates reductive iron assimilation [30]. Growth was scored after incubation for 48 h at 37 °C. The effect of H2O2 in the presence of BPS is not shown because H2O2 interferes with BPS function. The A. fumigatus ΔsidA mutant [30] lacks siderophore biosynthesis, which results in decreased iron uptake and decreased resistance to iron starvation. As BPS blocks the growth of ΔsidA [30], this mutant was not analyzed in the presence of BPS. Compared to iron sufficiency (+Fe), iron deprivation (-Fe/BPS) increased the oxidative stress accessibility of the wild type strain (marked by yellow dots); compared to the wild-type strain, SidA-deficiency increased oxidative stress accessibility on +Fe medium (marked by green dots) and -Fe medium (marked by blue dots).
Fig. 7Simplified model of adaptation mechanism to H2O2 stress under iron starvation in A. fumigatus based on the obtained proteomics and transcriptomics data