Literature DB >> 29746629

Romantic Relationship Satisfaction and Ambulatory Blood Pressure During Social Interactions: Specificity or Spillover Effects?

Talea Cornelius1, Jeffrey L Birk1, Donald Edmondson1, Joseph E Schwartz1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People in high-quality romantic relationships tend to have lower blood pressure (BP). People may experience lower BP specifically when interacting with romantic partners.
PURPOSE: This study parsed the effects of different types of social interactions on ambulatory BP (ABP) and tested whether romantic relationship satisfaction moderated these effects during interactions with partners in particular (specificity) or with others (spillover; e.g., friends, co-workers).
METHODS: Partnered participants (N = 594) were drawn from a larger study on BP and cardiovascular health (age = 46.5 ± 9.3; 57.4% female). Participants reported on romantic relationship satisfaction and completed 24-hr ABP monitoring. At each reading, participants reported whether they had a social interaction and with whom. Multilevel models accounted for nesting of data over time.
RESULTS: Romantic relationship satisfaction significantly modified the effects of some social interactions on systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP). Participants with high (+1 SD) relationship satisfaction had significantly lower SBP (-0.77 mmHg, p = .02) during partner interactions compared with no social interaction; low-satisfaction (-1 SD) participants had a nonsignificant 0.59 mmHg increase (p = .14). A similar pattern emerged for DBP. Relationship satisfaction also modified SBP response during friend interactions (elevated SBP for low-satisfaction participants) and DBP response during "other" interactions (elevated DBP for high-satisfaction participants).
CONCLUSION: Participants with high levels of romantic relationship satisfaction experienced significantly lower BP during social interactions with their partner compared with situations without social interaction. Although there was some evidence for spillover to other types of relationships, effects were largely restricted to partner interactions. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2018. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory blood pressure; Blood pressure; Couples; Ecological momentary assessment; Relationship satisfaction; Social interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29746629      PMCID: PMC6374713          DOI: 10.1093/abm/kay030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  19 in total

1.  Is there something unique about marriage? The relative impact of marital status, relationship quality, and network social support on ambulatory blood pressure and mental health.

Authors:  Julianne Holt-Lunstad; Wendy Birmingham; Brandon Q Jones
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2008-03-18

Review 2.  Personality, emotional adjustment, and cardiovascular risk: marriage as a mechanism.

Authors:  Timothy W Smith; Carolynne E Baron; Jeremy L Grove
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2013-11-11

3.  Is marital discord taxonic and can taxonic status be assessed reliably? Results from a national, representative sample of married couples.

Authors:  Mark A Whisman; Steven R H Beach; Douglas K Snyder
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2008-10

4.  Positive and negative evaluation of relationships: Development and validation of the Positive-Negative Relationship Quality (PN-RQ) scale.

Authors:  Ronald D Rogge; Frank D Fincham; Dev Crasta; Michael R Maniaci
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2016-10-13

Review 5.  Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Theodore F Robles; Richard B Slatcher; Joseph M Trombello; Meghan M McGinn
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Clinic Blood Pressure Underestimates Ambulatory Blood Pressure in an Untreated Employer-Based US Population: Results From the Masked Hypertension Study.

Authors:  Joseph E Schwartz; Matthew M Burg; Daichi Shimbo; Joan E Broderick; Arthur A Stone; Joji Ishikawa; Richard Sloan; Tyla Yurgel; Steven Grossman; Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  It's Complicated: Marital Ambivalence on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Daily Interpersonal Functioning.

Authors:  Wendy C Birmingham; Bert N Uchino; Timothy W Smith; Kathleen C Light; Jonathan Butner
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2015-10

8.  Social relationships and ambulatory blood pressure: structural and qualitative predictors of cardiovascular function during everyday social interactions.

Authors:  Julianne Holt-Lunstad; Bert N Uchino; Timothy W Smith; Chrisana Olson-Cerny; Jill B Nealey-Moore
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Daily marital interaction quality and carotid artery intima-medial thickness in healthy middle-aged adults.

Authors:  Nataria Tennille Joseph; Thomas W Kamarck; Matthew F Muldoon; Stephen B Manuck
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.312

10.  The stress-buffering effects of functional social support on ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Kimberly S Bowen; Bert N Uchino; Wendy Birmingham; McKenzie Carlisle; Timothy W Smith; Kathleen C Light
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response to Romantic Partner Interactions and Long-Term Cardiovascular Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Talea Cornelius; Jeffrey L Birk; Donald Edmondson; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.864

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.