Literature DB >> 12940395

Social relationships and ambulatory blood pressure: structural and qualitative predictors of cardiovascular function during everyday social interactions.

Julianne Holt-Lunstad1, Bert N Uchino, Timothy W Smith, Chrisana Olson-Cerny, Jill B Nealey-Moore.   

Abstract

Healthy normotensive men and women (N = 102) underwent a 3-day ambulatory blood pressure (BP) assessment in which a BP reading was taken 5 min into each social interaction. After each interaction, participants completed a diary that included structural categorization of the relationship and ratings of the quality of the relationship with the interaction partner. Random regression analyses revealed that interactions with family members and spouses were associated with lower ambulatory BP. Interactions with ambivalent network members (characterized by both positive and negative feelings) were associated with the highest ambulatory systolic BP, an effect that was independent of the familial effects on BP. Although there were psychological correlates associated with both structural and functional aspects of relationships, no evidence was found that these mediated the primary findings involving ambulatory BP. These data highlight the influence of both structural and qualitative aspects of relationships on ambulatory BP and possibly health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12940395     DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.4.388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  26 in total

1.  Ambivalent versus problematic social ties: implications for psychological health, functional health, and interpersonal coping.

Authors:  Karen S Rook; Gloria Luong; Dara H Sorkin; Jason T Newsom; Neal Krause
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-07-09

2.  Interpersonal Tensions and Pain Among Older Adults: The Mediating Role of Negative Mood.

Authors:  Jamie L Fuentecilla; Meng Huo; Kira S Birditt; Susan T Charles; Karen L Fingerman
Journal:  Res Aging       Date:  2019-11-10

3.  Spousal relationship quality and cardiovascular risk: dyadic perceptions of relationship ambivalence are associated with coronary-artery calcification.

Authors:  Bert N Uchino; Timothy W Smith; Cynthia A Berg
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-02-05

Review 4.  Social Ambivalence and Disease (SAD): A Theoretical Model Aimed at Understanding the Health Implications of Ambivalent Relationships.

Authors:  Julianne Holt-Lunstad; Bert N Uchino
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18

5.  It's Complicated: Marital Ambivalence on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Daily Interpersonal Functioning.

Authors:  Wendy C Birmingham; Bert N Uchino; Timothy W Smith; Kathleen C Light; Jonathan Butner
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2015-10

Review 6.  Cardiovascular reactivity in real life settings: measurement, mechanisms and meaning.

Authors:  Ydwine Jieldouw Zanstra; Derek William Johnston
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Spouse cancer caregivers' burden and distress at entry to home hospice: The role of relationship quality.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Gary Donaldson; Lee Ellington; Kathi Mooney; Michael Caserta; Dale Lund
Journal:  J Soc Pers Relat       Date:  2015-06-04

8.  Ambivalent relationship qualities between adults and their parents: implications for the well-being of both parties.

Authors:  Karen L Fingerman; Lindsay Pitzer; Eva S Lefkowitz; Kira S Birditt; Daniel Mroczek
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  The quality of social networks predicts age-related changes in cardiovascular reactivity to stress.

Authors:  Bert N Uchino; Robert G Kent de Grey; Sierra Cronan
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-06

10.  Social ties and cardiovascular function: an examination of relationship positivity and negativity during stress.

Authors:  Wendy Birmingham; Bert N Uchino; Timothy W Smith; Kathy C Light; David M Sanbonmatsu
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.