| Literature DB >> 29745863 |
Eli Goz1,2, Yael Tsalenchuck2, Rony Oren Benaroya2, Zohar Zafrir1,2, Shimshi Atar1, Tahel Altman2, Justin Julander3, Tamir Tuller4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Synthetic virology is an important multidisciplinary scientific field, with emerging applications in biotechnology and medicine, aiming at developing methods to generate and engineer synthetic viruses. In particular, many of the RNA viruses, including among others the Dengue and Zika, are widespread pathogens of significant importance to human health. The ability to design and synthesize such viruses may contribute to exploring novel approaches for developing vaccines and virus based therapies.Entities:
Keywords: Flavivirus; RNA viruses; Silent and non-synonymous mutations; Synthetic virology; Viral comparative genomics; Viral evolution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29745863 PMCID: PMC5998877 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2132-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Bioinformatics ISSN: 1471-2105 Impact factor: 3.169
Fig. 1Flow diagram of this study showing the full comparative genomics pipeline developed for synthetic biology of RNA viruses (see details in the main text)
Fig. 2Results of NGS study. a Positions of variants (SNVs and inserts) and read coverage along the genome of the wildtype virus (WT) and its synthetic constructs (assembly and in-cellulo). Genomic coordinates and annotations are specified in the “genome” panel. Positions of variants are marked by vertical bars (blue and red) in the “variants” panel; summary of variants for all samples (first row in the “variants” panel), and sample-specific variants (three different rows for in-cellulo, assembly, and WT) are shown. Eight Positions (1 indel and 7 SNVs) with VAF at least 0.15 that also passed Position Bias and Strand Bias filters were marked by red bars; 6 of them are found in the WT strain only. b Analysis of 32 CDS SNVs. The nucleotide variability at SNV positions is based on a set of 618 aligned DENV2 genomes, represented by the corresponding sequence logo in the “variability” panel. The coordinates of SNVs are specified in the x-axis; corresponding genes are specified in the bottom row. The variability at each position is represented by a stack of letters. The relative sizes of the letters indicate their frequency in the alignment at specific position, where the total height of the letters depicts the information content of the position in bits. The SNVs at each position are depicted in the “SNVs” panel in the following format: reference codon (reference AA) → variant codon (variant AA). The altered nucleotides are marked in red. The variant allele frequencies (VAF) at each position were specified in the “VAF” panel. Non-synonymous SNVs (18%) were marked by “N”. Positions that overlap with regions that undergo a conserved selection for strong or weak mRNA folding (based on [16]) were marked by “s” or “w” respectively. Seven CDS SNVs with VAF of at least 0.15 that also passed Position Bias and Strand Bias filters were marked by red asterisks
Fig. 5CpG dinucleotides are significantly suppressed in regions of 100 codons around SNVs as compared to genomic regions of the same size that do not contain any SNV
Fig. 3Sequence conservation and the surroundings of the SNVs in the multiple aligned genomes of the DENV serotypes and ZIKV. The nucleotide probability distribution for each SNV (marked in dashed line) and 4 upstream/downstream nucleotides is shown. The nucleotide representation is based on their amino acid sequences; see Methods. a Multiple alignments of SNVs 1–16. b Multiple alignments of SNVs 17–32
Fig. 4SNV variability analysis. a Sequence logo presentation of the SNVs variability in each of the 4 DENV serotype and ZIKV. b Variability distributions of the SNV and Non-SNV positions. The Non-SNV values were randomly selected from the 1st/2nd/3rd positions in their codons (relatively to their frequencies), such that the subsets of the Non-SNV has the same position distribution as the SNVs. The results show significantly higher values in the SNV case among the genomes of all DENV serotypes and ZIKV (empirical p < 0.02; see details in the Methods)
Fig. 6Results of AG129 mouse model study. a. Percentage of survival of AG129 mice infected with wild-type and synthetic DENV-2 (p-value < 0.001 for 12 dpi and furhter, as compared with sham controls). b. Mean weight change (%) of AG129 mice infected with different DENV-2 variants. c Virus titers from serum collected 3 dpi from infected AG129 mice (**p-value < 0.01, *p-value < 0.05, as compared with sham controls). d 50% plaque reduction neutralization titers (PRNT50) from serum taken 14 dpi (***p-value < 0.001, as compared with sham controls). Note that there were not sufficient quantities of serum for 5 samples: 2 from group 1(infected with WT variant), 1 from group 2 (infected with synthetic variant) and 2 from control group for quantification of neutralizing Ab
Morbidity and mortality of AG129 mice infected with wild type and synthetic DENV-2 New Guinea C strain
| Animals: Male and female AG129 mice | Duration of experiment: 28 days | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virus route: Intraperitoneal injection | Volume: 0.2 ml | ||||
| Toxicity controls | Infected, treated | ||||
| Treatment | Virus titer (ge/μg RNA)a | PRNT50 titer (GM ± SD)b | Alive / total | Virus titer (ge/μg RNA) | PRNT50 titer (GM ± SD)b |
| DENV-2 WT | – | – | 4/8 | 1.3 ± 1.4* | 1.5 ± 0.7 |
| DENV-2 synth | – | – | 2/8 | 2.1 ± 0.3** | 2.8 ± 0.2*** |
| Vehicle control | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | – | – | – |
GM geometric mean, SD standard deviation
aVirus titer expressed as virus titer equivalents (estimated by CCID50/ml stock) per μg total RNA
bmean day to death of mice dying prior to 31 dpi. PRNT50–50% plaque reduction neutralization titers
***p-value < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, as compared with sham-infected [vehicle] controls