Literature DB >> 29744895

Leaf anatomy does not explain apparent short-term responses of mesophyll conductance to light and CO2 in tobacco.

Marc Carriquí1, Cyril Douthe1, Arántzazu Molins2, Jaume Flexas1.   

Abstract

Mesophyll conductance to CO2 (gm ), a key photosynthetic trait, is strongly constrained by leaf anatomy. Leaf anatomical parameters such as cell wall thickness and chloroplast area exposed to the mesophyll intercellular airspace have been demonstrated to determine gm in species with diverging phylogeny, leaf structure and ontogeny. However, the potential implication of leaf anatomy, especially chloroplast movement, on the short-term response of gm to rapid changes (i.e. seconds to minutes) under different environmental conditions (CO2 , light or temperature) has not been examined. The aim of this study was to determine whether the observed rapid variations of gm in response to variations of light and CO2 could be explained by changes in any leaf anatomical arrangements. When compared to high light and ambient CO2 , the values of gm estimated by chlorophyll fluorescence decreased under high CO2 and increased at low CO2 , while it decreased with decreasing light. Nevertheless, no changes in anatomical parameters, including chloroplast distribution, were found. Hence, the gm estimated by analytical models based on anatomical parameters was constant under varying light and CO2 . Considering this discrepancy between anatomy and chlorophyll fluorescence estimates, it is concluded that apparent fast gm variations should be due to artefacts in its estimation and/or to changes in the biochemical components acting on diffusional properties of the leaf (e.g. aquaporins and carbonic anhydrase).
© 2018 Scandinavian Plant Physiology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29744895     DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Plant        ISSN: 0031-9317            Impact factor:   4.500


  7 in total

1.  Stomatal, mesophyll conductance, and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis during induction.

Authors:  Kazuma Sakoda; Wataru Yamori; Michael Groszmann; John R Evans
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Thermal Benefits From White Variegation of Silybum marianum Leaves.

Authors:  Oren Shelef; Liron Summerfield; Simcha Lev-Yadun; Santiago Villamarin-Cortez; Roy Sadeh; Ittai Herrmann; Shimon Rachmilevitch
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Fast photosynthesis measurements for phenotyping photosynthetic capacity of rice.

Authors:  Tingting Du; Ping Meng; Jianliang Huang; Shaobing Peng; Dongliang Xiong
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.993

4.  Desiccation tolerance in bryophytes relates to elasticity but is independent of cell wall thickness and photosynthesis.

Authors:  Alicia V Perera-Castro; Jaume Flexas
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  The α subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein regulates mesophyll CO2 conductance and drought tolerance in rice.

Authors:  Yotam Zait; Ángel Ferrero-Serrano; Sarah M Assmann
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 10.323

Review 6.  Biotechnological strategies for improved photosynthesis in a future of elevated atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  Stacy D Singer; Raju Y Soolanayakanahally; Nora A Foroud; Roland Kroebel
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Using photorespiratory oxygen response to analyse leaf mesophyll resistance.

Authors:  Xinyou Yin; Peter E L van der Putten; Daniel Belay; Paul C Struik
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.573

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.