Literature DB >> 29743263

Morphology-based differences in the thermal response of freshwater phytoplankton.

Angel M Segura1, Florencia Sarthou2, Carla Kruk3,4.   

Abstract

The thermal response of maximum growth rate in morphology-based functional groups (MBFG) of freshwater phytoplankton is analysed. Contrasting an exponential Boltzmann-Arrhenius with a unimodal model, three main features were evaluated: (i) the activation energy of the rise (Er), (ii) the presence of a break in the thermal response and (iii) the activation energy of the fall (Ef). The whole dataset (N = 563) showed an exponential increase (Er ∼ 0.5), a break around 24°C and no temperature dependence after the breakpoint (Ef = 0). Contrasting thermal responses among MBFG were found. All groups showed positive activation energy (Er > 0), four showed no evidence of decline in growth rate (temperature range = 0-35°C) and two presented a breakpoint followed by a sharp decrease in growth rate. Our results evidenced systematic differences between MBFG in the thermal response and a coherent response significantly related to morphological traits other than size (i.e. within MBFG). These results provide relevant information for water quality modelling and climate change predictions.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Keywords:  functional groups; metabolic ecology; phytoplankton; trait-based approach

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29743263      PMCID: PMC6012694          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  11 in total

1.  Real versus Artificial Variation in the Thermal Sensitivity of Biological Traits.

Authors:  Samraat Pawar; Anthony I Dell; Van M Savage; Jennifer L Knies
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Thermokinetics of Liometopum Apiculatum Mayr.

Authors:  H Shapley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1920-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Scaling the metabolic balance of the oceans.

Authors:  Angel López-Urrutia; Elena San Martin; Roger P Harris; Xabier Irigoien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Estimating regression models with unknown break-points.

Authors:  Vito M R Muggeo
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Systematic variation in the temperature dependence of physiological and ecological traits.

Authors:  Anthony I Dell; Samraat Pawar; Van M Savage
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mixotrophic organisms become more heterotrophic with rising temperature.

Authors:  Susanne Wilken; Jef Huisman; Suzanne Naus-Wiezer; Ellen Van Donk
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Erroneous Arrhenius: modified arrhenius model best explains the temperature dependence of ectotherm fitness.

Authors:  Jennifer L Knies; Joel G Kingsolver
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Temperature-dependent body size effects determine population responses to climate warming.

Authors:  Max Lindmark; Magnus Huss; Jan Ohlberger; Anna Gårdmark
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  The combined effects of reactant kinetics and enzyme stability explain the temperature dependence of metabolic rates.

Authors:  J P DeLong; J P Gibert; T M Luhring; G Bachman; B Reed; A Neyer; K L Montooth
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Rapid evolution of metabolic traits explains thermal adaptation in phytoplankton.

Authors:  Daniel Padfield; Genevieve Yvon-Durocher; Angus Buckling; Simon Jennings; Gabriel Yvon-Durocher
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 9.492

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fluctuation at High Temperature Combined with Nutrients Alters the Thermal Dependence of Phytoplankton.

Authors:  Juan Manuel González-Olalla; Juan Manuel Medina-Sánchez; Presentación Carrillo
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.552

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.